UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

 

 

 

Filed by the Registrantx Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

¨ Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

 

 

Corning Incorporated

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

 

 

  

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

  

 

 (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 (5) Total fee paid:

  

 

 

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1) Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 (3) Filing Party:

  

 

 (4) Date Filed:

 

  


LOGO

Notice of 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Corning IncorporatedThursday, April 26, 2012

One Riverfront Plaza11 a.m. Eastern Time

The Corning Museum of Glass Auditorium, Corning, New York 14831

Notice of 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

To Shareholders of Corning Incorporated:

You are cordially invited to attend the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Corning Incorporated which will be held inThe Corning Museum of Glass Auditorium, Corning, New York on Thursday, April 28, 201126, 2012 at 11:0011 a.m. Eastern Time.Time. The Annual Meeting is open to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 24, 2011,23, 2012, the record date for the meeting.

The principal business of the meeting will be:

 

 1.

To elect six10 directors for a one-year term;

 2.

To hold an advisory vote onapprove the Company’s executive compensation;

 3.To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation;

4.To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011;2012;

4.

To approve the adoption of the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan;

 5.

To considerapprove the non-binding shareholder proposal described on page 66 inamendment and restatement of the accompanying proxy statement, if presented atCompany’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the meeting;provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders; and

 6.

Any other matter, if any, as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

Our Board recommends that you votefor Items 1, 2, 3, 4 andagainst 5.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the shareholder proposal.annual meeting, please promptly submit your proxy or voting instructions by internet, telephone or mail in order to ensure the presence of a quorum.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY SUBMIT YOUR PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM.

Registered shareholders may vote:

 

By Internet at www.investorvote.com/glw. This will require your 6-digit control number.

 

By telephone (from the United States and Canada only) at (800) 652-VOTE (8683).

 

By mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided (see instructions on proxy card).

Beneficial owners:owners: If your shares are held in the account of or name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, follow the instructions you receive from the holder of record to vote your shares held in that account.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Denise A. Hauselt

Vice President, Secretary and Assistant General Counsel

March 14, 201113, 2012

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder

Meeting to Be Held on April 28, 201126, 2012

Our 2012 Proxy Statement and 20102011 Annual Report to Shareholders

are available at www.corning.com/2011_proxy2012_proxy


About2012 Proxy Summary

To assist you in reviewing the Company’s proxy statement in advance of the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we would like to call your attention to its key elements. The following description is only a summary. For additional information about these topics, please review the complete proxy statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) on February 13, 2012. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

•     Date and Time

Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 11 a.m. Eastern Time

•     Place

The Corning Museum of Glass Auditorium

Corning, New York

•     Record Date

February 23, 2012

•     Voting

Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please promptly submit your proxy or voting instructions by internet, telephone or mail in order to ensure the presence of a quorum.

Meeting Agenda

At the Annual Meeting, you will be voting on the following matters:

To elect ten directors for a one-year term (Proposal 1);

To approve the Company’s executive compensation (Proposal 2);

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (Proposal 3);

To approve the adoption of the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Proposal 4);

To approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders (Proposal 5); and

Any other matter, if any, as may properly come before the meeting.

i


Board Recommendations on Voting

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares as follows:

Proposal

 

Matter

 

Board Voting Recommendation

 Page Reference
       

1

 Election of Directors FOR each Nominee 7

2

 Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation FOR 62

3

 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm FOR 64

4

 Approval of Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan FOR 64

5

 Approval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders FOR 69

PROPOSAL 1: Election of Directors

The following 10 directors are being nominated for election to a one year term: Messrs. Brown; Canning; Clark; Flaws; Gund; Landgraf; Ruding and Wrighton; and Drs. Burns and Rieman.

Each of Messrs. Brown, Canning, Gund, Landgraf, and Ruding were elected by Corning’s shareholders on April 28, 2011, and their terms expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Each of Messrs. Flaws and Wrighton, and Dr. Rieman were elected by Corning’s shareholders on April 30, 2009, and their terms expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Mr. Clark was appointed by Corning’s Board of Directors on December 6, 2011. Dr. Burns was appointed by Corning’s Board of Directors on January 31, 2012. Mr. Clark and Dr. Burns are standing for election by shareholders for the first time. Each of Messrs. Cummings, Tookes and Weeks were elected by Corning’s shareholders on April 29, 2010 and their terms expire at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Mr. Smithburg, whose term expires this year, has met the Board’s mandatory retirement age and will not be standing for re-election. Mr. Tilton’s term also expires this year and he is not standing for re-election. Beginning with our 2013 Annual Meeting, all directors will stand for election for terms expiring at the next Annual Meeting.

On February 1, 2012, our Board of Directors approved and adopted an amendment to our By-Laws to provide that the vote required for the election of a director at our annual meeting will, except in a contested election, be the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in favor of or against such nominee. See “Majority Voting Standard” on page 7. In April 2010, the Company’s shareholders approved the Board of Directors’ proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors by the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and provide for the annual election of all directors upon the expiration of their current terms.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

See page 7 – “PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors” for more information.

ii


PROPOSAL 2: Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

In 2011, our shareholders supported an annual vote on executive compensation that we have implemented. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is requesting that shareholders approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), as disclosed, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, in the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, beginning on page 41. This includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the supporting tabular and narrative disclosure on executive compensation.

Most Recent Say on Pay Vote Result

Last year, Corning received 96% shareholder support from the non-binding Say on Pay vote. We view this as an affirmation of our current pay practices and, as a result, no significant changes were made to our executive compensation pay practices in 2011.

Company Performance and Pay Alignment

While fiscal year 2011 proved to be a challenging year, Corning’s executive pay program aligned with financial and stock performance by paying out amounts significantly below target.

In 2011, our reported results were as follows:

Revenue of $7.9 billion compared to $6.6 billion for 2010; a 19% increase and a record year;

Net profit after tax (“NPAT”) of $2,805 million compared to $3,558 million for 2010, a 21% decrease;

Earnings per share of $1.77 compared to $2.25 per share for 2010, a 21% decrease; and

Operating cash flow of $3,189 million compared to $3,835 million for 2010, a 17% decrease.

In 2011 our financial results fell significantly below target. Since we set rigorous performance goals for 2011, our incentive payouts were sharply reduced. As a result:

2011 annual bonus earned at 10% of target for NEOs;

2011 GoalSharing earned at 5.05% of base salary;

2011 Cash Performance Units earned at 60% of target;

2011 Stock Option grants are underwater; and

Value of 2011 time-based restricted stock units declined approximately 30% during the year.

Compensation Program

Corning has been in existence for over 160 years; with patient investment over many years, management continuity, and a collaborative culture of teamwork across varied businesses being critical to our long-term success. This means that our management must balance near-term results with long-term success while continuing to build long-term value through innovation. To fulfill this mission, Corning’s “pay-for-performance” philosophy forms the foundation for all decisions regarding executive compensation made by the Committee.

Highlights of our executive compensation program include:

On average, 82% of the target total direct compensation of our ongoing Named Executive Officers, excluding benefits and perquisites, is delivered in annual and long-term incentives that vary based on achievement of our annual financial targets or the price of our stock.

Annual incentives awarded to our Named Executive Officers under our Performance Incentive Plan depend solely on Corning’s consolidated financial performance.

Our long-term incentive program is composed of a balanced portfolio of cash performance units, stock options, and time-based restricted stock units. These components comprise 50%, 25% and 25% of the target long-term incentive value, respectively, and vest over 3 years.

Annual dilution associated with grants of stock options and restricted stock totaled significantly less than 1% in 2011.

In addition, our executive compensation program has evolved over time to reflect changing governance standards; details can be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

iii


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

See page 41 – “Executive Compensation” and page 62 – “PROPOSAL 2 – Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation” for more information.

PROPOSAL 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

At the meeting of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors held on February 1, 2011, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year. Although shareholder approval for this appointment is not required, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors are submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for ratification to obtain the views of shareholders. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the shareholders’ views in the future selection of Corning’s auditors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012.

See page 64 – “PROPOSAL 3 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” for more information.

PROPOSAL 4: Approval of the Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan

In 2012, Corning proposes adopting the Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which is a continuation of similar long-term incentive plans first adopted in 1974. The 2012 Plan is designed to provide a flexible mechanism to permit employees to obtain equity ownership in Corning, thereby increasing their proprietary interest in Corning’s growth and success. The Board of Directors believes that the long-term incentives are a critical element in Corning’s plans for future growth and Corning’s total compensation program and should be continued.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan will enable Corning to continue to offer long-term performance-based and time-based compensation through the grant of a variety of awards. Awards available under the 2012 Plan include stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance stock, performance units or other awards granted by the Compensation Committee.

Approval of the 2012 Plan will coincide with the termination of the 2005 Program, allowing for the retirement of approximately 40 million unused shares under the 2005 Program.

After factoring in the 85 million share reserve under the 2012 Plan and the retirement of remaining shares under the 2005 Program, Corning’s overhang from equity plans and outstanding stock options is less than 10 % on a diluted basis.

The 2012 Plan prohibits repricing options and stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval.

The 2012 Plan includes a recoupment policy where gains may be subject to clawback if appropriate or required.

The 2012 Plan includes minimum vesting of three years on time-based awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units and minimum vesting of one year on performance-based awards.

The 2012 Plan does not allow for the cancellation of options in exchange for cash or other property.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE CORNING INCORPORATED 2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

iv


See page 64 – “PROPOSAL 4 – Approval of Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan” for more information.

PROPOSAL 5: Approval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders

The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate”) currently requires the affirmative vote of 80% of the total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote to amend, alter or repeal Section 5 of the Certificate, which deals with the Board of Directors of the Company, including the general powers of the Board, the number of directors, their term of office, their removal and the Board’s authority to fill vacancies on the Board (unless such amendment, alteration or repeal has been approved by two-thirds of the entire Board). In addition, the Company’s Certificate provides that the affirmative vote of 80% of the total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote is required for certain business combination transactions with interested shareholders and to amend, alter or repeal those provisions (unless such business combination transactions or amendment, alteration or repeal has been approved by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire Board and a majority of the continuing directors). On February 1, 2012, the Board voted to approve, and recommended that the Company’s shareholders approve at the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders, an amendment to the Company’s Certificate to delete the provisions in the Certificate that currently require a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders.

The Board recognizes that supermajority voting requirements provide several advantages. However, the Board also recognizes that many investors and commentators believe that supermajority voting requirements limit a board’s accountability to shareholders and the ability of shareholders to participate in corporate governance. In this regard, the Board acknowledges the growing sentiment among shareholders in favor of eliminating such requirements. If the proposed amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate is approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s shareholders, Sections 5(f) and 6 will be eliminated in their entirety and subsequent paragraphs will be renumbered for continuity.

This description is qualified in its entirety by the actual text set forth in Appendix B, which contains the proposed amendments to the Certificate.

If the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate is approved by the requisite vote of the shareholders, it will become effective upon the filing of an appropriate restated certificate of incorporation with the New York Department of State. The Company would make such filing promptly after the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REMOVE THE PROVISIONS CURRENTLY REQUIRING A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMPANY’S SHAREHOLDERS.

See page 69 – “PROPOSAL 5 – To Approve Amendment and Restatement of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Remove the Provisions Currently Requiring a Supermajority Vote of the Company’s Shareholders” for more information.

Conduct of Other Business at 2012 Annual Meeting

We have not received notice of, and are not aware of, any other business to be transacted at the meeting other than indicated above. If any other item or proposal properly comes before the meeting, the proxies received will be voted on those matters in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.

v


CORNING INCORPORATED

One Riverfront Plaza

Corning, New York 14831

Corning is providing these proxy materials in connection with its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and Corning’s 2011 Annual Report were first mailed to shareholders on or about March 13, 2012. As used in this proxy statement, “Corning,” the “Company” and “we” may refer to Corning Incorporated itself, one or more of its subsidiaries, or Corning Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 26, 2012:

This proxy statement and Corning’s Annual Report to shareholders are available at

www.corning.com/2012_proxy

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Why Did You Send Me This Proxy Statement?

We sent this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card to you because our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This proxy statement summarizes information concerning the matters to be presented at the meeting and related information that will help you make an informed vote. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 14, 2011.13, 2012.

When and Where Is The Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 28, 2011,26, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at The Corning Museum of Glass Auditorium, Corning, New York.

Who May Attend The Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting is open to all holders of our common shares. To attend the meeting, you will need to register upon arrival. We may check for your name on our shareholders’ list and ask you to produce valid photo ID. If your shares are held in street name by your broker or bank, you should bring your most recent brokerage account statement or other evidence of your share ownership. If we cannot verify that you own Corning shares, it is possible that you will not be admitted to the meeting.

What Am I Voting On?

At the Annual Meeting, you will be voting:

To elect six10 directors for a one-year term (Proposal 1);term;

To hold an advisory vote onapprove the Company’s executive compensation (Proposal 2);compensation;

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3);

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 (Proposal 4);2012;

To considerapprove the non-binding shareholder proposal described on page 66, if presented atadoption of the meeting (Proposal 5);2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan;

To approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders; and

Any other matter, if any, as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

1


How Do You Recommend That I Vote On These Items?

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares:

FOR each of the director nominees (Proposal 1);

FOR the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers,Named Executive Officers, as such information is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying disclosure beginning on page 6624 (commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”) (Proposal 2);

FOR the approval of an annual advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3);

1


FOR ratification of the Board’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20112012 (Proposal 3);

FOR the adoption of the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Proposal 4); and

AGAINSTFOR the shareholder proposalapproval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders (Proposal 5).

Who Is Entitled To Vote?

You may vote if you owned our common shares as of the close of business on February 24, 2011,23, 2012, the record date for the Annual Meeting.

How Many Votes Do I Have?

You are entitled to one vote for each common share you own. As of the close of business on February 2, 2011,1, 2012, we had 1,565,794,8811,521,874,563 common shares outstanding. The shares held in our treasury are not considered outstanding and will not be voted or considered present at the meeting.

How Do I Vote By Proxy Before The Annual Meeting?

Before the meeting, registered shareholders may vote shares in one of the following three ways:

 

By Internet at www.investorvote.com/glw;

Ÿ

By Internet at www.investorvote.com/glw;

 

By telephone (from the United States and Canada only) at 1(800) 652-VOTE (8683); and

Ÿ

By telephone (from the United States and Canada only) at 1(800) 652-VOTE (8683); and

 

By mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided (see instructions on proxy card).

Ÿ

By mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided (see instructions on proxy card).

Please refer to the proxy card for further instructions on voting by Internet or telephone.

Please use onlyone of the three ways to vote.

If you hold shares in the account of or name of a broker, your ability to vote those shares by Internet and telephone depends on the voting procedures used by your broker, as explained below under“How Do I Vote If My Broker Holds My Shares In “Street Name”?”

May I Vote My Shares In Person At The Annual Meeting?

Yes. You may vote your shares at the meeting if you attend in person, even if you previously submitted a proxy card or voted by Internet or telephone. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, however, we strongly encourage you to vote your shares by proxy before the meeting.

May I Change My Mind After I Vote?

Yes. You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the polls close at the meeting. You may change your vote by:

 

signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to Corning’s Corporate Secretary at One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, NY 14831, prior to the meeting;

Ÿ

signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to Corning’s Corporate Secretary at One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, NY 14831, prior to the meeting;

 

voting again by Internet or telephone prior to the meeting; or

Ÿ

voting again by Internet or telephone prior to the meeting; or

 

Ÿ

voting again at the meeting.

voting again at the meeting.

2


You also may revoke your proxy prior to the meeting without submitting any new vote by sending a written notice that you are withdrawing your vote to our Corporate Secretary at the address listed above.

2


What Shares Are Included On My Proxy Card?

Your proxy card includes shares held in your own name and shares held in any Corning plan. You may vote these shares by Internet, telephone or mail, as described on the enclosed proxy card. Your proxy card does not include any shares held in a brokerage account in the name of your bank or broker (such shares are said to be held in “street name”).

How Do I Vote If I Participate In The Corning Investment Plan?

If you hold shares in the Corning Investment Plan, which includes shares held in the Corning Stock Fund in the 401(k) plan, these shares have been added to your other holdings on your proxy card. Your completed proxy card serves as voting instructions to the trustee of the plan. You may direct the trustee how to vote your plan shares by submitting your proxy vote for those shares, along with the rest of your shares, by Internet, telephone or mail, all as described on the enclosed proxy card. If you do not instruct the trustee how to vote, your plan shares will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion that it votes shares in other plan accounts for which it did receive timely voting instructions.

How Do I Vote If My Broker Holds My Shares In “Street Name”?

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in the name of your bank or broker (this is called “street name”), those shares are not included in the total number of shares listed as owned by you on the enclosed proxy card. Instead, your bank or broker will send you directions on how to vote those shares.

What Is A “Broker Non-Vote”?

If you own shares through a bank or broker in street name, you may instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares. A “broker non-vote” occurs when you fail to provide your bank or broker with voting instructions and the bank or broker does not have the discretionary authority to vote your shares on a particular proposal because the proposal is not a routine matter under the New York Stock Exchange rules. As explained under the question Will“Will My Shares Held In Street Name Be Voted If I Do NotProvide My Proxy?,” Proposals 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 are not considered routine matters under the current New York Stock Exchange rules, so your bank or broker will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares held in street name on those items. Abstentions and broker non-votes count for quorum purposes, but not for the voting of these proposals. A broker non-vote may also occur if your broker fails to vote your shares for any reason. Proposal 43 (ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm) is considered a routine matter under the New York Stock Exchange rules, so your bank or broker will have discretionary authority to vote your shares held in street name on that item.

Will My Shares Held In Street Name Be Voted If I Do Not Provide My Proxy?

Under the New York Stock Exchange rules, if you own shares in “street name” through a broker and do not vote, your broker may not vote your shares on proposals determined to be “non-routine.” In such cases, the absence of voting instructions results in a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-voted shares count toward achieving a quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting, but they do not affect the determination of whether the non-routine matter is approved or rejected. The proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is the only matter in this proxy statement considered to be a routine matter for which brokers will be permitted to vote on behalf of their clients, if no voting instructions are furnished. Since Proposals 1, 2, 34 and 5 are non-routine matters, broker non-voted shares will not count as votes cast to affect the determination of whether those proposals are approved or rejected.Therefore, it is important that you provide voting instructions to your broker.

 

3


What If I Return My Proxy Card Or Vote By Internet Or Telephone But Do Not Specify How I Want To Vote?

If you sign and return your proxy card or complete the Internet or telephone voting procedures, but do not specify how you want to vote your shares, we will vote them as follows:

 

FOR each of the director nominees (Proposal 1);

FOR the approval on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officersthe Company’s Named Executive Officers, as such information is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying disclosure beginning on page 24 (commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”) (Proposal 2);

FORthe approval, on an advisory basis, of an annual advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3);

FOR ratification of the Board’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20112012 (Proposal 3);

FOR the adoption of the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Proposal 4); and

AGAINSTFOR the non-binding shareholder proposalapproval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders. (Proposal 5).

If you participate in the Corning Investment Plan and do not submit timely voting instructions, the trustee of the plan will vote the shares in your plan account in the same proportion that it votes shares in other plan accounts for which it did receive timely voting instructions, as explained above under the question “How Do I Vote If I Participate In The Corning Investment Plan?

What Does It Mean If I Receive More Than One Proxy Card?

If you received more than one proxy card, you have multiple accounts with your brokers or our transfer agent. Please vote all of these shares. We recommend that you contact your broker or our transfer agent to consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. You may contact our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at 1-800-255-0461.

May Shareholders Ask Questions At The Annual Meeting?

Yes. Our representatives will answer your questions of general interest to shareholders at the end of the meeting. In order to give a greater number of shareholders the opportunity to ask questions, we may impose certain procedural requirements, such as limiting repetitive or follow-up questions, or those of a personal nature.

How Many Shares Must Be Present To Hold The Meeting?

In order for us to conduct our meeting, a majority of our outstanding common shares as of February 24, 2011,23, 2012, the record date for the meeting, must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting. This is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if you attend the meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail.

 

4


What Is The Vote Required For Each Proposal?

 

Proposal

  

Affirmative Vote Required

 Broker
Discretionary
Voting Allowed
Proposal 1—Election of six10 directors Plurality of votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy, subject to our majority vote policy described belowNo
Proposal 2—Advisory vote on executive compensation  Majority of votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy No
Proposal 32Advisory vote on frequencyApproval of advisory vote onthe Company’s executive compensation  Majority of votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy No
Proposal 43—Ratification of auditors for Fiscal Year 2011fiscal year 2012  Majority of votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy Yes
Proposal 54—Adoption of the non-binding shareholder proposal2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan  Majority of votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy. Shareholder approvalproxyNo
Proposal 5— Approval of this non-binding shareholder proposal would not automatically allow holdersthe amendment and restatement of 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting. Under New York law, to change these meeting requirements would first require the Board to authorize amendments to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholdersMajority of the total shares outstanding and By-Laws.entitled to vote No

With respect to Proposals 1, 2, 4 and 5,each Proposal, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. If you “ABSTAIN” from voting on any of these Proposals, the abstention will not constitute a vote cast. With respect to Proposal 3, you may vote to hold a say-on-pay vote once every “ONE”, “TWO” or “THREE” years, or you may “ABSTAIN.”

We have a majority-vote policy for the election of directors in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The policy provides that in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” (i.e., “ABSTAIN”) from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election is required to tender his or her resignation following certification of the shareholder vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept such a letter of resignation. The Board will determine whether to accept or reject the letter of resignation and disclose its decision-making process. Details of the majority-vote policy are set out in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and under “Proposal 1—Election of Directors” in this proxy statement.

How Will Broker Non-Votes Be Treated?

Except for Proposal 4,3, broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes, but not entitled to vote, so they will have no effect on the outcome of any election or proposal.

How Will Voting On “Any Other Business” Be Conducted?

We have not received proper notice of, and are not aware of, any business to be transacted at the meeting other than as indicated in this proxy statement. If any other item or proposal properly comes before the meeting, the proxies received will be voted on those matters in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.

5


Who Pays For The Solicitation Of Proxies?

Our Board of Directors is making this solicitation of proxies on our behalf. We will pay the costs of the solicitation, including the costs for preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement. We have hired Georgeson Inc. to assist us in soliciting proxies. It may do so by telephone, in person or by other electronic communications. We anticipate paying Georgeson a fee of $15,000$15,500 plus expenses for these services. We also will reimburse brokers, nominees and fiduciaries for their costs in sending proxies and proxy materials to our shareholders so that you may vote your shares. Our directors, officers and regular employees may supplement Georgeson’s proxy solicitation efforts by contacting you by telephone or electronic communication or in person. We will not pay directors, officers or other regular employees any additional compensation for their proxy solicitation efforts.

How Can I Find The Voting Results Of The Annual Meeting?

Following the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, we will include the voting results in a Form 8-K, which we expect to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or before May 4, 2011.2, 2012.

5


How Do I Submit A Shareholder Proposal For, Or Nominate A Director For Election At Next Year’s Annual Meeting?

If you wish to submit a proposal to be included in our proxy statement for our 20122013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we must receive it at our principal office on or before November 15, 2011.13, 2012. Please address your proposal to: Corporate Secretary, Corning Incorporated, One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, New York 14831.

We will not be required to include in our proxy statement a shareholder proposal that is received after that date or that otherwise does not meet the requirements for shareholder proposals established by the SEC or as set forth in our By-Laws.

If you miss the deadline for including a proposal in our printed proxy statement, or would like to nominate a director or bring other business before the 20122013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, under our current By-Laws (which are subject to amendment at any time), you must notify our Corporate Secretary in writing not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting. For our 20122013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we must receive notice on or after December 30, 2011,27, 2012, and on or before January 30, 2012.26, 2013.

Can I Receive Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials And Annual Reports?

Yes. This proxy statement and Corning’s 20102011 Annual Report are available on Corning’s website at www.corning.com. www.corning.com. Instead of receiving paper copies of next year’s proxy statement and Annual Report in the mail, shareholders can elect to receive an e-mail message that will provide a link to these documents on the website. By opting to access your proxy materials online, you will save us the cost of producing and mailing documents to you, reduce the amount of mail you receive, and help preserve environmental resources. Corning’s shareholders who have enrolled in the electronic proxy delivery service previously will receive their materials online this year. Shareholders of record may enroll in the electronic proxy statement and Annual Report access service for future Annual Meetings by registering online at www.computershare.com. www.computershare.com. Beneficial or “street name” shareholders who wish to enroll in electronic access service may do so at www.icsdelivery.com. www.icsdelivery.com. We may, at some point, use the SEC’s “Notice and Access” method of proxy distribution. If we were to utilize the “Notice and Access” method, you would receive a notice in the mail about how to access electronic copies of the proxy materials or how to have paper copies mailed to you.

Are You “Householding” For Shareholders Sharing The Same Address?

Yes. The SEC’s rules regarding the delivery to shareholders of proxy statements, annual reports, prospectuses and information statements permit us to deliver a single copy of these documents to an address

6


shared by two or more of our shareholders. This method of delivery is referred to as “householding,” and can significantly reduce our printing and mailing costs. It also reduces the volume of mail you receive. This year, we are delivering only one proxy statement and 20102011 Annual Report to multiple registered shareholders sharing an address, unless we receive instructions to the contrary from one or more of the shareholders. We will still be required, however, to send you and each other shareholder at your address an individual proxy voting card. If you would like to receive more than one copy of this proxy statement and our 20102011 Annual Report, we will promptly send you additional copies upon written or oral request directed to our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., toll free at 1-800-255-0461. The same phone number may be used to notify us that you wish to receive a separate proxy statement or Annual Report in the future, or to request delivery of a single copy of a proxy statement ofor Annual Report if you are receiving multiple copies.

6


PROPOSAL 1

PROPOSAL 1—Election of Directors

In April 2010, the Company’s shareholders approved the Board of Directors’ proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors by the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and provide for the annual election of allThe following ten directors upon the expiration of their current terms. The Board of Directors presently has six directors whose terms expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and are being nominated for election to a one-year term to serve until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.one year term: Messrs. Brown, Canning, Clark, Flaws, Gund, Landgraf, Ruding, and Wrighton and Drs. Burns and Rieman.

Each of Messrs. Brown, Canning, Gund, Landgraf, and Ruding were elected by Corning’s shareholders on April 24, 2008,28, 2011, and their terms expire at the 20112012 Annual Meeting. Each of Messrs. Flaws and Drs. Rieman and Wrighton were elected by Corning’s shareholders on April 30, 2009, and their terms expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Mr. CanningClark was appointed by Corning’s Board of Directors on JuneDecember 6, 2010. Mr. Tilton2011. Dr. Burns was appointed by Corning’s Board of Directors on November 30, 2010. Messrs. CanningJanuary 31, 2012. Mr. Clark and TiltonDr. Burns are standing for election by shareholders for the first time. Each of Messrs. Cummings, Tookes and Weeks were elected by Corning’s shareholders on April 29, 2010 and their terms expire at the 2013 Annual Meeting. Mr. O’ConnorSmithburg, whose term expires this year, has met the Board’s mandatory retirement age and will not be standing for re-election.

Each of Messrs. Brown, Canning, Gund, Landgraf, Ruding, Mr. Tilton’s term also expires this year and Tiltonhe is not standing for re-election. Beginning with our 2013 Annual Meeting, all directors will stand for election for a one-year term.terms expiring at the next Annual Meeting.

Majority-Vote Policy.Majority Voting Standard.A plurality On February 1, 2012, our Board of votes cast is requiredDirectors approved and adopted an amendment to our By-Laws to provide that at each meeting of the shareholders for the election of directors. However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any nomineedirectors, the vote required for election of a director who does not receivewill, except in a contested election, be the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in anyfavor of or against such nominee. In a contested election, a nominee receiving a plurality of the votes cast at such election shall be elected. An election is considered to be contested if there are more nominees for election than positions on the Board of Directors to be filled by election at the meeting. The amendment took effect on February 1, 2012.

The By-Laws also provide that in an uncontested election, will promptly, following certification ofonce the election results are certified, an incumbent director nominee who does not receive the required votes for re-election will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board. A director nominee will have failed to receive the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast if the number of “withhold” votes in respect of such nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes “for” such director nominee’s election (excluding abstentions). An election will be deemed to be “uncontested” if the number of director candidates does not exceed the number of directors to be elected.

The Board, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will decide whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that it considers relevant. Within 90 days of the certification of the election results, the Board will decide whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Board will promptly disclose its decision in a press release or SEC filing. If the Board rejects the tendered resignation, such press release or SEC filing will include an explanation of the Board’s reasons for its rejection of the resignation.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this policy will recuse himself or herself from the deliberations, recommendation, or decision, as applicable, of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board regarding whether to accept such resignation. However, if a majority of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or Board, as applicable, are required to tender resignations in accordance with the director resignation policy, then the independent directors who are not required to tender resignations will appoint a committee from amongst themselves to consider the resignations and, in the event there are fewer than three such independent directors, the entire Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or Board, as applicable, may participate in the deliberations, recommendation, or decision, as applicable. The foregoing description of the amendment to our By-Laws is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the amendment, a copy of which was filed with the SEC on a Form 8-K on February 2, 2012.

7


Declassification of the Board.At our 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders voted to declassify our Board by the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and provide for the annual election of all directors upon the expiration of their current terms. The Boardstatus of Directors presently has six directors whose terms expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and who are being nominated for election to one-year terms to serve until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.declassification is as follows:

 

The continuing directors whose current terms will expire at the 2012 or 2013 Annual Meetings of Shareholders, respectively, will serve the remainder of their terms, and the term of office for director nominees elected at the 2012 or 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will expire at the following Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Ÿ

The Board of Directors presently has eight continuing directors whose terms expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, all of whom are being nominated for election to one-year terms.

 

Any director appointed to the Board because of an increase in the size of the Board, or to fill a vacancy, will hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at which the director will be eligible to stand for re-election for a term expiring at the following Annual Meeting of Shareholders.7


Ÿ

Two newly appointed directors are standing for election for the first time and are being nominated for election to one-year terms.

Ÿ

The three continuing directors whose current terms will expire at the 2013 Annual Meetings of Shareholders, will serve the remainder of their terms.

Ÿ

Beginning with the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, all directors will stand for election for terms expiring at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Ÿ

Any director appointed to the Board because of an increase in the size of the Board, or to fill a vacancy, will hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at which the director will be eligible to stand for re-election for a term expiring at the following Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Each of the nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. If a nominee is not able to serve, proxy holders will vote your shares for the substitute nominee, unless you have withheld authority. No nominee now owns beneficially any of the securities (other than directors’ qualifying shares) of any of Corning’s subsidiary companies. We have included below certain information about the nominees for election as directors and the directors who will continue in office after the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has concluded that the skills, qualifications and experience of each of the director nominees and continuing directors supports such nominee or director’s continued membership on the Company’s Board of Directors.

Nominees for Election as Directors

Nominees for Election for Terms Expiring in 20122013

LOGO

John Seely Brown

Retired Chief Scientist

LOGO

John Seely Brown
Retired Chief Scientist
Xerox Corporation

Dr. Brown served Xerox Corporation in various scientific research positions from 1978, until his retirement in 2002. In 1986, he was elected vice president in charge of advanced research and was director of the Palo Alto Research Center from 1990 to 2000. Dr. Brown was named chief scientist of Xerox in 1992, retiring in 2002. He is a visiting scholar and advisor to the Provost at the University of Southern California. He is also the independent co-chairman of Deloitte’s Center for the Edge. Dr. Brown is a director of Amazon.com, Inc. and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. He is a former director of Polycom, Inc. Corning director since 1996. Age 70.

Formerly the chief scientist of a large scale technology-based company (Xerox), Dr. Brown brings significant experience in the areas of research and development, technology and innovation to our Board. His additional areas of specialized knowledge include organizational learning, complex adaptive systems, micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) and nanotechnology. Dr. Brown also has significant expertise in business strategies in Asia. His current work includes advising on international corporate strategies in the digital age.

Xerox Corporation

Dr. Brown served Xerox Corporation in various scientific research positions from 1978, until his retirement in 2002. In 1986, he was elected vice president in charge of advanced research and was director of the Palo Alto Research Center from 1990 to 2000. Dr. Brown was named chief scientist of Xerox in 1992, retiring in 2002. He is a visiting scholar and advisor to the Provost at the University of Southern California. He is also the independent co-chairman of Deloitte’s Center for the Edge. Dr. Brown is a director of Amazon.com, Inc. and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. He is a former director of Polycom, Inc. Corning director since 1996. Age 71.

Formerly the chief scientist of a large scale technology-based company (Xerox), Dr. Brown brings significant experience in the areas of research and development, technology and innovation to our Board. His additional areas of specialized knowledge include organizational learning, complex adaptive systems, micro electrical mechanical system (MEMS) and nanotechnology. Dr. Brown also has significant expertise in business strategies in Asia and cloud computing. His current work includes advising on international corporate strategies in the digital age.

LOGO

Stephanie A. Burns

Retired Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

Dow Corning Corporation

Dr. Burns has nearly 30 years of global innovation and business leadership experience. Dr. Burns joined Dow Corning in 1983 as a researcher and specialist in organosilicon chemistry. In 1994, she became the company’s first director of women’s health. She was elected to the Dow Corning Board of Directors in 2001 and elected as president in 2003. She served as Dow Corning’s chief executive officer from 2004 until May 2011 and served as chairman from 2006 through 2011. Currently, she is an honorary president of the Society of Chemical Industry and was appointed by President Obama to the President’s Export Council. Dr. Burns is a former chairman of the American Chemistry Council. She is a director of GlaxoSmithKline plc. Corning director since 2012. Age 57.

Dr. Burns brings significant expertise in scientific research, issues management, science and technology leadership and business management to the Board, as well as skills related to her Ph.D. in organic chemistry.

 

8


LOGO

John A. Canning, Jr.
Co-founder and Chairman
Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC

Mr. Canning co-founded Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC in 1992, serving as its chief executive officer until he became chairman in 2007. He previously spent 24 years with First Chicago Corporation, most recently as executive vice president of The First National Bank of Chicago and president of First Chicago Venture Capital. Mr. Canning is trustee and chairman of several Chicago-area non-profit organizations. He is a commissioner of the Irish Reserve Fund and a former director and chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Mr. Canning is a director of Exelon Corporation. He is a former director of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc. Corning director since 2010. Age 66.

Mr. Canning brings thirty years’ of experience in private equity investing, including reviewing financial statements and audit results and making investment and acquisition decisions. As a former director and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, he has insight into economic trends important to our business. In addition to his business experience, he also has a law degree and is a recognized leader in the Chicago business community. Mr. Canning’s business experience and service on the boards of other companies and organizations enable him to contribute to Corning’s board. Mr. Canning’s experience in banking and managing investments, and his experience on the audit committees of other organizations, make him a valued member of our audit and finance committees.

LOGO

Gordon Gund
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Gund Investment Corporation

Besides being the chairman and CEO of Gund Investment Corporation, which was founded in 1968, Mr. Gund is co-founder and chairman of The Foundation Fighting Blindness. The Foundation Fighting Blindness is a national, non-profit organization dedicated to finding the causes, treatments and/or cures for retinitis pigmentosa, age-related macular degeneration, and allied retinal degenerative diseases. He is a director of the Kellogg Company. Corning director since 1990. Age 71.

Mr. Gund brings to the Board his many years of experience as an entrepreneur, chief executive officer, investment professional and public company director. His business ventures covered finance and investment banking, sports, consumer products, philanthropy and medical research. Mr. Gund has significant experience as a public company lead director and has provided leadership to the Corning Board for over 21 years, from which he has developed additional expertise in the areas of compensation and corporate governance.

LOGO

John A. Canning, Jr.

Co-founder and Chairman

Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC

Mr. Canning co-founded Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC in 1992, serving as its chief executive officer until he became chairman in 2007. He previously spent 24 years with First Chicago Corporation, most recently as executive vice president of The First National Bank of Chicago and president of First Chicago Venture Capital. Mr. Canning is trustee and chairman of several Chicago-area non-profit organizations. He is a commissioner of the Irish Reserve Fund and a former director and chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Mr. Canning is a director of Exelon Corporation and TransUnion Corp. He is a former director of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc. Corning director since 2010. Age 67.

Mr. Canning brings 31 years of experience in private equity investing, including reviewing financial statements and audit results and making investment and acquisition decisions. As a former director and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, he has insight into economic trends important to our business. In addition to his business experience, he also has a law degree and is a recognized leader in the Chicago business community. Mr. Canning’s business experience and service on the boards of other companies and organizations enable him to contribute to Corning’s board. Mr. Canning’s experience in banking and managing investments, and his experience on the audit committees of other organizations, make him a valued member of our finance committee.

LOGO

Richard T. Clark

Retired Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Merck & Co., Inc.

Mr. Clark joined Merck in 1972, and held a broad range of senior management positions. He became president and chief executive officer of Merck in May 2005, and chairman of the board in April 2007. He transitioned from the chief executive officer role in January 2011, and served as Merck board chairman through November 2011. He was president of the Merck Manufacturing Division (June 2003 to May 2005) of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (formerly known as Merck & Co., Inc.) He is a director of Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and serves on the advisory board of American Securities. He is chairman of the board of Project Hope and a trustee of several charitable non-profit organizations. Corning director since 2011. Age 66.

As the former chairman, president and chief executive officer of a Fortune 100 company, Mr. Clark brings to Corning broad managerial expertise, operational expertise and deep business knowledge, as well as a track record of achievement.

LOGO

James B. Flaws

Vice Chairman and

Chief Financial Officer

Corning Incorporated

Mr. Flaws joined Corning in 1973 and served in a variety of controller and business management positions. He was elected assistant treasurer of Corning in 1993; vice president and controller in 1997 and vice president of finance and treasurer in May 1997; senior vice president and chief financial officer in December 1997; executive vice president and chief financial officer in 1999; and to his current position in 2002. Mr. Flaws is a director of Dow Corning Corporation. He has been a member of Corning’s Board of Directors since 2000. Age 63.

Since joining Corning in 1973, Mr. Flaws has held a wide range of management positions across its control, financial, treasury, and business development functions in specific line business units, as well as at corporate-wide levels. As a result of his diverse responsibilities over more than 30 years, he has very broad experience in many financial, investor relations, and supervisory roles within the company, including leading the spinoff of Corning’s health care businesses into two separate publicly-traded companies in 1996, and overseeing many mergers and acquisitions by the company, as well as the sale of numerous business units and restructuring efforts.

LOGO

Gordon Gund

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

Gund Investment Corporation

Besides being the chairman and CEO of Gund Investment Corporation, which was founded in 1968, Mr. Gund is co-founder and chairman of The Foundation Fighting Blindness. The Foundation Fighting Blindness is a national, non-profit organization dedicated to finding the causes, treatments and/or cures for retinitis pigmentosa, age-related macular degeneration, and allied retinal degenerative diseases. He is a director of the Kellogg Company. Corning director since 1990. Age 72.

Mr. Gund brings to the Board his many years of experience as an entrepreneur, chief executive officer, investment professional and public company director. His business ventures covered finance and investment banking, sports, consumer products, philanthropy and medical research. Mr. Gund has significant experience as a public company lead director and has provided leadership to the Corning Board for over 22 years, from which he has developed additional expertise in the areas of compensation and corporate governance.

 

9


LOGO

Kurt M. Landgraf
President and Chief Executive Officer
Educational Testing Service

Mr. Landgraf is president and chief executive officer of Educational Testing Service, a private non-profit educational testing and measurement organization, and joined ETS in that position in 2000. Prior to that, he was executive vice president and chief operating officer of E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, where he previously held a number of senior leadership positions, including chief financial officer. He is a director of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Mr. Landgraf is a former director of IKON Office Solutions Inc. Corning director since 2007. Age 64.

Mr. Landgraf was selected for his wealth of executive management experience in public companies, non-profit entities, higher education, and government. He brings to the Board his financial expertise and operations skills and experience, represented by his positions as the chief financial officer and chief operating officer of E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company. Mr. Landgraf’s other areas of specialized knowledge include technology, transportation, education, pharmaceuticals, health care, energy, materials, and mergers and acquisitions.

 

LOGO

H. Onno Ruding
Retired Vice Chairman
Citicorp and Citibank, N.A.

Dr. Ruding has served private firms and the public (serving as Minister of Finance of The Netherlands from 1982-1989) in various financial positions, serving as a director of Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. from 1990 and 1998, respectively, to September 30, 2003 and vice chairman of Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. from 1992 to September 30, 2003. He retired from active employment from Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. on September 30, 2003. He was a member of the international advisory committee of Citigroup until February 2010. Dr. Ruding is also a director of BNG (Bank for the Netherlands Municipalities) and RTL Group, and a member of UNIAPAC, the Committee for European Monetary Union, the Pontifical Council Justice and Peace, the European Advisory Board of the American-European Community Association, the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation and the Trilateral Commission. Dr. Ruding is the chairman of the Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS), the chairman of the Netherlands National Museum Palace Het Loo and the chairman of the Advisory Council of the Amsterdam Institute of Finance. Dr. Ruding is a former director of Alcan Inc. and Holcim Ltd. Corning director since 1995. Age 71.

Dr. Ruding is a finance expert and economist. As a former Minister of Finance in The Netherlands, executive board member of the International Monetary Fund, vice chairman and director of Citibank in New York, and chairman of the board of the CEPS in Brussels, he provides a wealth of knowledge in international finance and investment, markets, trade and development, and risk analysis.

LOGO

Kurt M. Landgraf

President and

Chief Executive Officer

Educational Testing Service

Mr. Landgraf is president and chief executive officer of Educational Testing Service, a private non-profit educational testing and measurement organization, and joined ETS in that position in 2000. Prior to that, he was executive vice president and chief operating officer of E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, where he previously held a number of senior leadership positions, including chief financial officer. He is a director of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Mr. Landgraf is a former director of IKON Office Solutions Inc. Corning director since 2007. Age 65.

Mr. Landgraf was selected for his wealth of executive management experience in public companies, non-profit entities, higher education, and government. He brings to the Board his financial expertise and operations skills and experience, represented by his positions as the chief financial officer and chief operating officer of E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company. Mr. Landgraf’s other areas of specialized knowledge include technology, transportation, education, pharmaceuticals, health care, energy, materials, and mergers and acquisitions.

LOGO

Deborah D. Rieman

Managing Director

Equus Management Company

Dr. Rieman has more than 25 years of experience in the software industry. Currently, she is Managing Director of Equus Management Company, a private investment fund. From 1995 to 1999, she served as president and chief executive officer of Check Point Software Technologies, Incorporated. She is a director of Keynote Systems. Dr. Rieman is a former director of Tumbleweed Communications Corp and Kintera Inc. Corning director since 1999. Age 62.

Dr. Rieman brings significant expertise in information technology, innovation and entrepreneurial endeavors to the Board, and skills related to her Ph.D. in mathematics. She is also the former president and chief executive officer of a publicly listed software company specializing in security, and has experience in technology development, marketing, business development and support, investor relations, and investing.

 

10


LOGO

Glenn F. Tilton
Chairman of the Board
United Continental Holdings, Inc.

Mr. Tilton is Chairman of the Board of Directors of United Continental Holdings, Inc. and immediate past chairman, president, and chief executive officer of UAL Corporation, the parent company of United Airlines where Mr. Tilton served as chairman and chief executive officer. He previously spent more than 30 years with Texaco, Inc. progressing through leadership roles in marketing, corporate planning and operations. Mr. Tilton is chairman of the Air Transport Association, the industry trade organization representing the leading U.S. airlines. Mr. Tilton was named by President Obama to the Presidential Export Council and by U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to the Future of Aviation Advisory Committee. He is also a director of United Continental Holdings, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. Corning director since 2010. Age 62.

Mr. Tilton brings a deep understanding of strategic planning and operational management from his many years of business, management, and financial experience. At Texaco, Inc., Mr. Tilton spent 30 years building business expertise in a variety of roles such as marketing and corporate planning. He later gained significant leadership and management experience as a key executive at Texaco, Inc., UAL Corporation and United Air Lines, Inc., as well as international business operations experience. Through his various professional roles, Mr. Tilton also has experience in a number of industries including aviation, energy, and pharmaceuticals.

LOGO

H. Onno Ruding

Retired Vice Chairman

Citicorp and Citibank, N.A.

Dr. Ruding has served private firms and the public (serving as Minister of Finance of The Netherlands from 1982-1989) in various financial positions, serving as a director of Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. from 1990 and 1998, respectively, to September 30, 2003 and vice chairman of Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. from 1992 to September 30, 2003. He retired from active employment from Citicorp and Citibank, N.A. on September 30, 2003. He was a member of the international advisory committee of Citigroup until February 2010. Dr. Ruding is also Chairman of BNG (Bank for the Netherlands Municipalities) and a member of UNIAPAC, the Committee for European Monetary Union, the Pontifical Council Justice and Peace, the European Advisory Board of the American-European Community Association, the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation and the Trilateral Commission. Dr. Ruding is the chairman of the Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS), the chairman of the Netherlands National Museum Palace Het Loo and the chairman of the Advisory Council of the Amsterdam Institute of Finance. Dr. Ruding is a former director of Alcan Inc., RTL Group and Holcim Ltd. Corning director since 1995. Age 72.

Dr. Ruding is a finance expert and economist. As a former Minister of Finance in The Netherlands, executive board member of the International Monetary Fund, vice chairman and director of Citibank in New York, and chairman of the board of the CEPS in Brussels, he provides a wealth of knowledge in international finance and investment, markets, trade and development, and risk analysis.

LOGO

Mark S. Wrighton

Chancellor and Professor of

Chemistry

Washington University in St. Louis

Since 1995, Dr. Wrighton has been Chancellor and Professor of Chemistry at Washington University in St. Louis, a major research university. Before joining Washington University, he was a researcher and professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he was Head of the Department of Chemistry from 1987 to 1990, and then Provost from 1990 to 1995. Dr. Wrighton served as a Presidential appointee to the National Science Board from 2000 to 2006, and chaired that Board’s audit and oversight committee during that time. He also is a past chair of the Association of American Universities, The Business Higher Education Forum, and the Consortium on Financing Higher Education, and continues as a member of these organizations. He was elected to membership in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Philosophical Society and he is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He also serves as a director of Cabot Corporation and Brooks Automation, Inc. Dr. Wrighton is a former director of A.G. Edwards, Inc. Corning director since 2009. Age 62.

Dr. Wrighton is a professor, chemist and research scientist with expertise in materials and research interests in the areas of transition metal catalysis, photochemistry, surface chemistry, molecular electronics, and in photoprocesses at electrodes. Under Chancellor Wrighton’s leadership, Washington University has grown significantly in academic stature, research enterprise, infrastructure, student quality, curriculum and international reputation. In addition to his executive leadership, Dr. Wrighton brings to the Board his vast scientific knowledge and understanding of complex research and development issues.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF

EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

11


Directors Continuing in Office

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 20122013

LOGO

James B. Flaws
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Corning Incorporated

Mr. Flaws joined Corning in 1973 and served in a variety of controller and business management positions. He was elected assistant treasurer of Corning in 1993; vice president and controller in 1997 and vice president of finance and treasurer in May 1997; senior vice president and chief financial officer in December 1997; executive vice president and chief financial officer in 1999; and to his current position in 2002. Mr. Flaws is a director of Dow Corning Corporation. He has been a member of Corning’s Board of Directors since 2000. Age 62.

Since joining Corning in 1973, Mr. Flaws has held a wide range of management positions across its control, financial, treasury, and business development functions in specific line business units, as well as at corporate-wide levels. As a result of his diverse responsibilities over more than 30 years, he has very broad experience in many financial, investor relations, and supervisory roles within the company, including leading the spinoff of Corning’s health care businesses into two separate publicly-traded companies in 1996, and overseeing many mergers and acquisitions by the company, as well as the sale of numerous business units and restructuring efforts.

 

11LOGO


LOGO

Deborah D. Rieman
Managing Director
Equus Management Company

Dr. Rieman has more than 25 years of experience in the software industry. Currently, she is Managing Director of Equus Management Company, a private investment fund. From 1995 to 1999, she served as president and chief executive officer of Check Point Software Technologies, Incorporated. She is a director of Keynote Systems. Dr. Rieman is a former director of Tumbleweed Communications Corp, Kintera Inc., and Arbinet Corp. Corning director since 1999. Age 61.

Dr. Rieman brings significant expertise in information technology, innovation and entrepreneurial endeavors to the Board, and skills related to her Ph.D. in mathematics. She is also the former president and chief executive officer of a publicly listed software company specializing in security, and has experience in technology development, marketing, business development and support, investor relations, and investing.

LOGO

Mark S. Wrighton
Chancellor and Professor of Chemistry
Washington University in St. Louis

Since 1995, Dr, Wrighton has been Chancellor and Professor of Chemistry at Washington University in St. Louis, and serves as its chief executive officer. Before joining Washington University, he was a researcher and professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he was Head of the Department of Chemistry from 1987 to 1990, and then Provost from 1990 to 1995. Dr. Wrighton served as a Presidential appointee to the National Science Board from 2000 to 2006, and chaired that Board’s audit and oversight committee during that time. He also is a past chair of the Association of American Universities, The Business Higher Education Forum, and the Consortium on Financing Higher Education, and continues as a member of these organizations. He also serves as a director of Cabot Corporation and Brooks Automation, Inc. Dr. Wrighton is a former director of A.G. Edwards, Inc. Corning director since 2009. Age 61.

Dr. Wrighton is a professor, chemist and research scientist with expertise in materials, with research interests including photochemistry and metal catalysts. He is also the chief executive officer of a major research university, which since his appointment in 1995, has grown significantly in academic stature, research, infrastructure, and fiscal management. Dr. Wrighton brings to the Board his vast scientific knowledge and understanding of complex research and development issues, and executive leadership.

Robert F. Cummings, Jr.

Vice Chairman of Investment Banking

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Mr. Cummings was appointed Vice Chairman of Investment Banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in December 2010, where he advises on client opportunities across sectors and industry groups. From 2002 to 2009, he served as a senior managing director at GSC Group, Inc., a privately held money management firm. Mr. Cummings began his business career in the investment banking division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. in 1973, and was a partner of the firm from 1986 until his retirement in 1998. He served as an advisory director at Goldman Sachs until 2002. Mr. Cummings is a director of Viasystems Group, Inc., and a former director of RR Donnelley & Sons Co. and GSC Investment Corp. Corning director since 2006. Age 62.

Mr. Cummings’ Board qualifications include over 27 years of investment banking experience at Goldman Sachs, where he advised corporate clients on financings, business development, mergers and acquisitions and other strategic financial issues. Additionally, he brings knowledge in the areas of technology, telecommunications, private equity, and real estate to the Board.

LOGO

Hansel E. Tookes II

Retired Chairman and Chief

Executive Officer

Raytheon Aircraft Company

Mr. Tookes retired from Raytheon Company in December 2002. He joined Raytheon in 1999 and served as president of Raytheon International, chairman and chief executive officer of Raytheon Aircraft and executive vice president of Raytheon Company. From 1980 to 1999, Mr. Tookes served United Technologies Corporation as president of Pratt and Whitney’s Large Military Engines Group and in a variety of other leadership positions. He is a director of Ryder Systems Inc., NextEra Energy, Inc. and Harris Corporation. Corning director since 2001. Age 64.

Mr. Tookes provides extensive experience in operations, manufacturing, performance excellence, business development, technology-driven business environments, and military and government contracting. He also brings his science and engineering education, training and knowledge to the Board. Mr. Tookes’ industry expertise includes aviation, aerospace and defense, transportation, and technology.

LOGO

Wendell P. Weeks

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and

President

Corning Incorporated

Mr. Weeks joined Corning in 1983 and was named a vice president and deputy general manager of the Telecommunications Products division in 1995; vice president and general manager in 1996; senior vice president in 1997; senior vice president of Opto-Electronics in 1998; executive vice president in 1999; president, Corning Optical Communications in 2001; president and chief operating officer of Corning in 2002; and president and chief executive officer in 2005. Mr. Weeks became chairman and chief executive officer on April 26, 2007, and president on December 31, 2010. He is a director of Merck & Co. Inc. Mr. Weeks has been a member of Corning’s Board of Directors since 2000. Age 52.

Mr. Weeks brings deep and broad knowledge of the company based on his long career across a wide range of Corning’s staff groups and major businesses. Mr. Weeks has 29 years of Corning experience including financial management, business development, commercial leadership, and general management. His experiences in many of Corning’s businesses and technologies, and more than six years as chief executive officer, have given him a unique understanding of Corning’s diverse business operations and innovations.

 

12


Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2013

LOGO

Robert F. Cummings, Jr.
Vice Chairman of Investment Banking
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Mr. Cummings was appointed Vice Chairman of Investment Banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co. on December 2, 2010, where he advises on client opportunities across sectors and industry groups. From 2002 to 2009, he served as a senior managing director at GSC Group, Inc., a privately held money management firm. Mr. Cummings began his business career in the investment banking division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. in 1973, and was a partner of the firm from 1986 until his retirement in 1998. He served as an advisory director at Goldman Sachs until 2002. Mr. Cummings is a director of Viasystems Group, Inc., and a former director of RR Donnelley & Sons Co. and GSC Investment Corp. Corning director since 2006. Age 61.

Mr. Cummings’ Board qualifications include over 27 years of investment banking experience at Goldman Sachs, where he advised corporate clients on financings, business development, mergers and acquisitions and other strategic financial issues. Additionally, he brings knowledge in the areas of technology, telecommunications, private equity, and real estate to the Board.

LOGO

William D. Smithburg
Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
The Quaker Oats Company

Mr. Smithburg joined Quaker Oats in 1966, being elected president in 1979, chief executive officer in 1981 and chairman in 1983. He also served as president from November 1990 to January 1993 and from November 1995 to November 1997 when he retired. Mr. Smithburg is a director of Abbott Laboratories and Northern Trust Corporation. He is a former director of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation. Corning director since 1987. Age 72.

Mr. Smithburg brings significant executive experience in corporate governance, operations, corporate strategy, acquisitions and divestitures, advertising, and supply chain management. He is the former chairman and chief executive officer of a $6 billion public company and has long served on several public company boards. Mr. Smithburg’s industry expertise includes consumer products, transportation, pharmaceuticals, finance and banking, and education.

LOGO

Hansel E. Tookes II
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Raytheon Aircraft Company

Mr. Tookes retired from Raytheon Company in December 2002. He joined Raytheon in 1999 and served as president of Raytheon International, chairman and chief executive officer of Raytheon Aircraft and executive vice president of Raytheon Company. From 1980 to 1999, Mr. Tookes served United Technologies Corporation as president of Pratt and Whitney’s Large Military Engines Group and in a variety of other leadership positions. He is a director of Ryder Systems Inc., BBA Aviation plc, FPL Group, Inc. and Harris Corporation. Corning director since 2001. Age 63.

Mr. Tookes provides extensive experience in operations, manufacturing, performance excellence, business development, technology-driven business environments, and military and government contracting. He also brings his science and engineering education, training and knowledge to the Board. Mr. Tookes’ industry expertise includes aviation, aerospace and defense, transportation, and technology.

13


LOGO

Wendell P. Weeks
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Corning Incorporated

Mr. Weeks joined Corning in 1983 and was named a vice president and deputy general manager of the Telecommunications Products division in 1995; vice president and general manager in 1996; senior vice president in 1997; senior vice president of Opto-Electronics in 1998; executive vice president in 1999; president, Corning Optical Communications in 2001; president and chief operating officer of Corning in 2002; and president and chief executive officer in 2005. Mr. Weeks became chairman and chief executive officer on April 26, 2007, and president on December 31, 2010. He is a director of Merck & Co. Inc. Mr. Weeks has been a member of Corning’s Board of Directors since 2000. Age 51.

Mr. Weeks brings deep and broad knowledge of the company based on his long career across a wide range of Corning’s staff groups and major businesses. Mr. Weeks has 28 years of Corning experience including financial management, business development, commercial leadership, and general management. His experiences in many of Corning’s businesses and technologies, and more than five years as chief executive officer, have given him a unique understanding of Corning’s diverse business operations and innovations.

14


Meetings and Committees of Thethe Board

Board Meetings

Board Meetings

The Board of Directors held 1618 regularly scheduled meetings and one special meeting during 2010.2011. All directors attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the Committees on which they serve, with the exception of Mr. Smithburg, who attended 57% of the Executive Committee meetings. Mr. Smithburg attended 100% of the meetings of the Compensation Committee, as well as of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and 94% of the Board Meetings. He missed 3 of 7 Executive Committee meetings due to previous commitments for which he was out of the country in remote locations where suitable, secure telephone service at the time of the Executive Committee meeting was not available. Such commitments will not affect Mr. Smithburg’s ability to attend Executive Committee meetings in the future.serve.

Board Committees

In addition to an Executive Committee, which is specified in the By-Laws and acts by delegation, Corning has five standing Board committees: Audit, Compensation, Corporate Relations, Finance, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Each committee’s written charter, as reviewed annually and adopted by the Board of Directors, is available on Corning’s website at www.corning.com/investor_relations/corporate_governance/board_download_library.aspx. Copies of each of the charters are also attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A, B, C, D, E, F, and E,G, respectively.

Audit

The Audit Committee met eight10 times during 2010.2011. The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Landgraf (Chair), Canning,Clark, Cummings, Ruding, Tilton and Wrighton and Ms.Dr. Rieman. The Audit Committee:

 

Assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of (i) the integrity of Corning’s financial statements, (ii) the internal auditors’ performance, and (iii) Corning’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

Ÿ

Assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of (i) the integrity of Corning’s financial statements, (ii) the internal auditors’ performance, and (iii) Corning’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

 

Meets in executive sessions with the independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors and management;

Ÿ

Meets in executive sessions with the independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors and management;

 

Approves the appointment of Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm;

Ÿ

Approves the appointment of Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Reviews and discusses with the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors the effectiveness of Corning’s internal control over financial reporting, including disclosure controls;

Ÿ

Reviews and discusses with the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors the effectiveness of Corning’s internal control over financial reporting, including disclosure controls;

 

Reviews and discusses with management, the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors the scope of the annual audit;

Ÿ

Reviews and discusses with management, the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors, the scope of the annual audit;

 

Reviews the quarterly and annual financial statements and other reports provided to shareholders with management and the independent registered public accounting firm;

Ÿ

Reviews the quarterly and annual financial statements and other reports provided to shareholders with management and the independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Discusses company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, and reviews contingent liabilities and risks that may be material to Corning, as well as major legislative and regulatory developments which could materially impact Corning’s contingent liabilities and risks;

Ÿ

Discusses company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, and reviews contingent liabilities and risks that may be material to Corning, as well as major legislative and regulatory developments that could materially impact Corning’s contingent liabilities and risks;

 

Oversees the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;

Ÿ

Oversees the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;

 

Reviews transactions between Corning and related persons that are required to be disclosed in our filings with the SEC; and

Ÿ

Reviews transactions between Corning and related persons that are required to be disclosed in our filings with the SEC; and

 

Ÿ

Determines the appropriateness of and approves the fees for audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Determines the appropriateness of and approves the fees for audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

1513


Compensation

The Compensation Committee met seveneight times during 2010.2011. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Smithburg (Chair), Brown, Clark and Gund, and O’Connor.Dr. Rieman. The Compensation Committee:

 

Reviews Corning’s goals and objectives with respect to executive compensation;

Ÿ

Reviews Corning’s goals and objectives with respect to executive compensation;

 

Evaluates the CEO’s performance in light of Corning’s goals and objectives;

Ÿ

Evaluates the CEO’s performance in light of Corning’s goals and objectives;

 

Determines and approves compensation for the CEO and other officers of Corning;

Ÿ

Determines and approves compensation for the CEO and other officers of Corning;

 

Reviews and approves employment, severance and change in control agreements for the CEO and other officers of Corning;

Ÿ

Reviews and approves employment, severance and change in control agreements for the CEO and other officers of Corning;

 

Recommends to the Board the compensation arrangements with independent directors;

Ÿ

Recommends to the Board the compensation arrangements with non-employee directors;

 

Oversees Corning’s equity compensation plans; and

Ÿ

Oversees Corning’s equity compensation plans; and

 

Makes recommendations to the Board regarding non-equity incentive and equity incentive plans.

Ÿ

Makes recommendations to the Board regarding non-equity incentive and equity incentive plans.

Compensation decisions for executives, including the “Named Executive Officers,” the fivesix executive officers of the Company listed in this proxy statement, and the directors are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has administrative and/or oversight responsibility to compensate key executives effectively and in a manner consistent with our stated compensation strategy. The Compensation Committee has engaged an independent executive compensation expert from Aon Hewitt, an outside global human resources consulting firm, to conduct an annual review of its total compensation program for executives. The independent expert supports the Committee by providing data regarding market practices and makes recommendations for changes to plan designs and policies that are consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy.

The agenda for meetings of the Compensation Committee is determined by its Chairman, with the assistance of the Chief Administrative OfficerSenior Vice President Human Resources and also the Senior Vice President Global Compensation and Benefits. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer are invited to attend the Compensation Committee meetings, though they leave the room during discussions and deliberations of individual compensation actions affecting them personally. The Compensation Committee Chairman reports the Committee’s recommendations on executive compensation to the Board. The Company’s Global Compensation and Benefits department supports the Compensation Committee in its duties and, along with the Chief ExecutiveAdministrative Officer, may be delegated authority to fulfill certain administrative duties regarding the compensation programs. The Compensation Committee has authority under its charter to retain, approve fees for and terminate advisors, consultants and agents as it deems necessary to assist in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee reviews the total fees paid to Aon Hewitt by the Company to ensure that the independent compensation expert maintains his objectivity and independence when rendering advice to the Committee. For more information on the Compensation Committee, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26..

Corporate Relations

The Corporate Relations Committee met five times during 2010.2011. The current members of the Corporate Relations Committee are Ms. RiemanMessrs. Wrighton (Chair), Landgraf and Messrs. Landgraf, Tilton and Wrighton.Dr. Burns. The Corporate Relations Committee focuses on the areas of employment policy, public policy and community relations in the context of the business strategy of Corning.

14


Executive

The Executive Committee met seveneight times during 2010.2011. The current members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Weeks (Chair), Cummings, Flaws, Gund, O’Connor and Smithburg. All other directors are alternate members of the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee serves primarily as a means of taking action requiring Board approval between regularly scheduled meetings of the Board. The Executive Committee is authorized to act for the full Board on matters other than those specifically reserved by New York law to the Board. In practice, the Executive Committee’s actions are generally limited to matters such as the authorization of corporate credit facilities, borrowings and pricing of Corning’s public offering of securities, and specific transactions for which the Board delegates its authority.

 

16


Finance

The Finance Committee met seven times during 2010.2011. The current members of the Finance Committee are Messrs. Ruding (Chair), Canning, Cummings, Flaws and Tookes. The Finance Committee:

 

Ÿ

Monitors present and future capital requirements of Corning;

Ÿ

Reviews all material transactions prior to execution;

Ÿ

Reviews potentials mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and investments in third parties;

Ÿ

Reviews Corning’s exposure to financial, economic and hazard risks;

Ÿ

Monitors Corning’s cash management plans and activities;

Ÿ

Reviews Corning’s tax position and strategy;

Ÿ

Reviews and monitors Corning’s credit rating;

Ÿ

Reviews funding actions for Corning’s pension programs; and

Ÿ

Reviews Corning’s financial plans and other financial information that Corning uses in its analysis of internal decisions.

Nominating and future capital requirements of Corning;Corporate Governance

Reviews all material transactions prior to execution;

Reviews potentials mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and investments in third parties;

Reviews Corning’s exposure to financial, economic and hazard risks;

Monitors Corning’s cash management plans and activities;

Reviews Corning’s tax position and strategy;

Reviews and monitors Corning’s credit rating;

Reviews funding actions for Corning’s pension programs; and

Reviews Corning’s financial plans and other financial information that Corning uses in its analysis of internal decisions.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times during 2010.2011. The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. O’ConnorGund (Chair), Brown, Gund,Canning, Smithburg and Tookes. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:

 

Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members;

Ÿ

Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members;

 

Reviews candidates recommended by shareholders;

Ÿ

Reviews candidates recommended by shareholders;

 

Determines the criteria for selecting director nominees;

Ÿ

Determines the criteria for selecting director nominees;

 

Conducts inquiries into the background of director nominees;

Ÿ

Conducts inquiries into the background of director nominees;

 

Recommends to the Board, director nominees to be proposed for election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

Ÿ

Recommends to the Board, director nominees to be proposed for election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

 

Reviews and recommends to the Board, whether to accept or reject the resignation of an incumbent director who failed to receive a majority of the votes cast in an election that is not a result of a contested election pursuant to the Company’s Majority Voting Policy;

Ÿ

Reviews and recommends to the Board, whether to accept or reject the resignation of an incumbent director who failed to receive a majority of the votes cast in an election that is not a result of a contested election pursuant to the Company’s Majority Voting Policy;

 

Monitors significant developments in the regulation and practice of corporate governance;

Ÿ

Monitors significant developments in the regulation and practice of corporate governance;

 

Develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance guidelines;

Ÿ

Develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance guidelines;

 

Ÿ

Assists the Board in assessing the independence of Board members;

 

Identifies Board members to be assigned to the various committees;15


Ÿ

Identifies Board members to be assigned to the various committees;

 

Oversees and assists the Board in the review of the Board’s performance;

Ÿ

Oversees and assists the Board in the review of the Board’s performance;

 

Establishes director retirement policies;

Ÿ

Establishes director retirement policies;

 

Reviews, approves and ratifies transactions between Corning and related persons; and

Ÿ

Reviews, approves and ratifies transactions between Corning and related persons; and

 

Reviews activities of Board members and senior executives for potential conflict of interest.

Ÿ

Reviews activities of Board members and senior executives for potential conflict of interest.

The process for electing director nominees entails making a preliminary assessment of each candidate based upon his/her résumé and other biographical and background information, as well as his/her willingness to serve. This information is then evaluated against the criteria set forth below, as well as the specific needs of Corning at that time. Based upon this preliminary assessment, candidates who appear to be the best fit are invited to participate in a series of interviews. At the conclusion of the process, if it is determined that the candidate will be a good fit, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends the candidate to the Board for election at the next Annual Meeting. If the director nominee is a current Board member, the Nominating and

17


Corporate Governance Committee also considers prior Corning Board performance and contributions. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses the same process for evaluating all candidates regardless of the source of the nomination.

The minimum qualifications and attributes that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes must be possessed by a director nominee may include:

 

Character and the ability to apply good business judgment;

Ÿ

Character and the ability to apply good business judgment;

 

The ability to exercise his/her duties of loyalty and care;

Ÿ

The ability to exercise his/her duties of loyalty and care;

 

Proven leadership skills;

Ÿ

Proven leadership skills;

 

Diversity of experience;

Ÿ

Diversity of experience;

 

High integrity and ethics;

Ÿ

High integrity and ethics;

 

The ability to understand complex principles of business and finance;

Ÿ

The ability to understand complex principles of business and finance;

 

Scientific expertise; and

Ÿ

Scientific expertise; and

 

Familiarity with national and international issues affecting businesses.

Ÿ

Familiarity with national and international issues affecting businesses.

Our Board is comprised of accomplished professionals who represent diverse and key areas of expertise including, national and international business, operations, manufacturing, finance and investing, energy, management, entrepreneurship, government, higher education and science, research and technology. While Corning does not have a formal diversity policy with respect to director nominations, we believe that the diversity of skills, knowledge, opinions and fields of expertise represented on our Board is one of its core strengths. When identifying and selecting director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the impact a nominee would have in terms of increasing the diversity of the Board with respect to professional experience, background, viewpoints, skills and areas of expertise. We believe that the resulting diversity of directors allows the Board to engage in honest and challenging discussions, in service of the best decisions for the Company and its shareholders. The diversity of our directors’ skills allows each director an opportunity to provide specific leadership in his or her respective areas of expertise. In the context of the Board’s needs, the appropriate mix of director competencies and experiences evolves for Corning over time. In an effort to increase diversity, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in working with the Board also considers diversity of race, gender and national origin of potential director candidates. We believe our directors’ wide range of professional experiences and backgrounds, education and skills has proven invaluable to the Company and we intend to continue leveraging this strength.

All of the director nominees are elected members of the Board of Directors, except for Messrs. CanningDr. Burns and TiltonMr. Clark who were identified by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and appointed by the Board of

16


Directors in 2010.January 2012 and December 2011, respectively. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains the assistance of a third-party recruiting firm to assist in identifying and evaluating potential director nominees, as it deems appropriate.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders. If you wish to nominate a candidate, please forward the candidate’s name and a detailed description of the candidate’s qualifications, skills and experience, a document indicating the candidate’s willingness to serve and evidence of the nominating shareholder’s ownership of Corning’s shares to: Corporate Secretary, Corning Incorporated, One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, New York 14831. A shareholder wishing to nominate a candidate must also comply with the notice requirements described above under the question How“How Do I Submit A Shareholder Proposal For, Or Nominate A Director For Election At Next Year’s Annual Meeting?

Corporate Governance Matters

18


Corporate Governance MattersGuidelines

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our business, property and affairs are managed by or, are under the direction of, the Board of Directors pursuant to New York Business Corporation Law and our By-Laws. Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of Corning’s business through discussions with the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, the Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer and other key members of management, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.

The Board has adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines that address the make-up and functioning of the Board. A copy of these guidelines is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix FH and can also be found on our website atwww.corning.com/investor_relations/corporate_governance/board_download_library.aspx.board_download_library.aspx.

Board Leadership Structure

Corning has a board leadership structure under which our Chief Executive Officer also serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors. As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we believe that having one person serve as both Chief Executive Officer and Chairman demonstrates to our employees, suppliers, customers and other stakeholders that the Company is under strong leadership, with a single person setting the tone and having primary responsibility for managing our operations. This unity of leadership eliminates the potential for confusion or duplication of efforts, and provides clear leadership for the Company. We believe that the Company has been well-served by this structure.

Our Board of Directors is comprised of 12 directors who are independent directors,under the New York Stock Exchange listing requirements, one non-independent director, plus two management directors. All of our independent directors are highly accomplished and experienced business people in their respectivethe fields of business, technology or academics, who have demonstrated leadership in significant enterprises and are familiar with board processes. For additional information about the backgrounds and qualifications of our directors, see “Nominees for Election as Directors” and “Directors Continuing in Office” in this proxy statement.

Our Board has six standing committees—Audit, Compensation, Corporate Relations, Executive, Finance, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. Three of the committees are comprised solely of independent directors, five of the committees have a separate, independent chair, and the Executive Committee has three independent plus two employeemanagement directors as members. The chair of each of these committees is responsible for directing the work of the committee in fulfilling its responsibilities, see “Meetings and Committees of the Board” in this proxy statement.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board designates and utilizes a Lead Director, currently James J. O’Connor.Mr. William Smithburg. The Lead Director plays an important role in our corporate governance structure. The

17


Lead Director’s responsibilities include: presiding at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors; serving as liaison between the Chairman and the independentnon-employee directors; convening meetings of the independentnon-employee directors; consulting with the Chairman on matters relating to Board performance and corporate governance; and, if requested by major shareholders, ensuring that he is available for consultation and direct communication. The Chairman consults with the Lead Director in advance of each Board meeting to obtain his comments, suggestions, and approval for the meeting schedule and timing, for each agenda, and for the types of information to be sent to the Board.

We believe that, in addition to fulfilling our Lead Director responsibilities, Mr. James J. O’Connor, has made valuable contributions to the Company through his abilities to build Board consensus, effectively coordinate Board agendas and activities with the Chairman, and by his judgment and decision-making for the Company. Mr. O’Connor,Smithburg, whose term as director expires at the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, has reached the Board’s mandatory retirement age and will no longer serve as Lead Director. At the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Board will designate a new Lead Director.

19


In February 2011,2012, as part of our review of corporate governance and succession planning, the Board (led by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) re-evaluated our Board leadership structure, to ensure that it remains optimal for the Company and its shareholders. The Board determined that the current Board leadership structure continues to serve the Companyis working well, provides strong leadership and facilitates effective communication, oversight and governance of the Company, while allowing for independent decision making as required. We recognize that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies with different histories and cultures, as well as companies with varying sizes and performance characteristics. We believe our current leadership structure—under which our Chief Executive Officer serves as Chairman of the Board, five of the six Board committees are chaired by independent directors and our Lead Director assumes specified responsibilities on behalf of the independentother directors—remains the optimal board leadership structure for our Company and our shareholders.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

Independent

Non-management Board members meet without management present at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Independent Board members also meet separately at least once a year. Additional meetings may be called by the Lead Director in his discretion or at the request of the Board. The Lead Director, Mr. Smithburg, presides over meetings of the independent directors.these meetings.

Board Risk Oversight

Corning has a comprehensive risk management program that engages the Company’s management/leadership and Board. Since 2005,2004, the Company has employed an Enterprise Risk Management program (“ERM”) that was modeled on the COSO II framework. “COSO” is the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, a voluntary private-sector organization, established in the United States, dedicated to providing guidance to executive management and governance entities on critical aspects of organizational governance, business ethics, internal control, enterprise risk management, fraud, and financial reporting. Corning’s ERM is a company-wide effort that involves the Board, management and Corning staff in an integrated effort to identify, assess and manage risks that may potentially affect the Company. A “Risk Council,” chaired by our Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Flaws, and composed of Corning management and staff, is a core governance element of the ERM.

The Risk Council’s activities include aggregating, prioritizing and assessing risks including, financial, operational, business, reputational, governance and managerial risks. The Risk Council assignsassists each of our businesses in identifying its applicable risks, and determines whether such risks are material at the management ofCompany level. While each business is responsible for managing its identified risks – as we believe the local business teams are in the best position to a local team that can bestidentify and manage their risks – the risks, and then evaluates the specific riskRisk Council works with each business on its mitigation plans created by the local team. Corning believesfor any material risks. We believe this central oversight of and assistance of these localto the business teams is the most effective way to manage the Company’s risks. The Risk Council reports directly to the management committee of the Company.

18


Additionally, our Compliance Council, chaired by the Senior Vice President and General Counsel, provides the Risk Council with the results of its review of the Company’s compliance with laws and regulations of the countries in which we conduct business. The Compliance Council reports directly to each of the Audit Committee and Corporate Relations Committee.

We also perform a comprehensive risk assessment related to our internal controls. This assessment includes interviews with senior management, and financial leaders as well as evaluation of Risk Council findings, audit results, current business priorities and the economic environment. The assessment results are used to establish our internal audit plan, conduct internal audits and perform any resulting remedial actions. The assessment and internal audit results are a key part of our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance program for internal controls. The Audit Committee reviews the results of thisthe risk assessment are shared annually withand the Audit Committee.results of our internal audits quarterly.

The Audit Committee annually reviews a comprehensive report on the Company’s ERM processes. In accordance with NYSE requirements, our Audit Committee is responsible for company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, and to review contingent liabilities and risks that may be material to Corning, as well as major legislative and regulatory developments that could materially impact Corning’s

20


contingent liabilities and risks. Regularly, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses risks facing the Company, including legal issues, employee matters, information technology security and governmental regulation and legislation, among other things. Our Finance Committee, pursuant to its charter, reviews regularly the top risks identified by the ERM process and strategies for managing exposure to specific financial, economic, and hazard risks. Each of the Audit and Finance Committee’s chairman reports to the entire Board of Directors regarding their risk management review and any significant items identified. In addition, each of our Board committees considers the risk exposures within its areas of responsibility. For example, our Corporate Relations Committee reviews potential risk exposures in the environmental, health, safety, employment, and product liability areas.

The full Board provides additional risk oversight in numerous ways, including the following:

 

Annually, prior to its approval of the annual budget and long-term plan, the Board reviews the potential risks which could negatively impact the proposed budget and plan. This review includes the types of risks, as well as pessimistic and worst case scenarios should the identified risks be realized.

Ÿ

Annually, prior to its approval of the annual budget and long-term plan, the Board reviews the potential risks which could negatively impact the proposed budget and plan. This review includes the types of risks, as well as pessimistic and worst case scenarios should the identified risks be realized.

 

The Board frequently reviews the Company’s Strategic Framework and any risks which might negatively impact it.

Ÿ

The Board frequently reviews the Company’s Strategic Framework and any risks which might negatively impact it.

 

Prior to approving any significant investment or divestiture actions by the Company, the Board reviews a detailed proposal identifying the rationale and risks involved in such action.

Ÿ

Prior to approving any significant investment or divestiture actions by the Company, the Board reviews a detailed proposal identifying the rationale and risks involved in such action.

 

The Board regularly receives written reports covering environmental, safety and health, and human resources matters.

Ÿ

The Board regularly receives written reports covering environmental, safety and health, and human resources matters.

 

At least four times each year, the Board attends “Technology with the Board” sessions, which allow the directors to review and discuss current research and development projects and thereby assess risks related to the Company’s technology and intellectual property developments.

Ÿ

At least four times each year, the Board attends “Technology with the Board” sessions, which allow the directors to review and discuss current research and development projects and thereby assess risks related to the Company’s technology and intellectual property developments.

 

The full Board also engages in periodic discussions regarding risks with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other company officers, as it deems appropriate.

Ÿ

The full Board also engages in periodic discussions regarding risks with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other company officers, as it deems appropriate.

We endeavor to keep the Board fully apprised of risks facing the Company and believe that our directors provide effective oversight of the risk management function. We believe the Board’s risk oversight function allows our directors to make well-informed decisions and increases the effectiveness of the Company’s leadership structure.

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the Board of Directors make an annual determination regarding the independence of each of Corning’s directors. The Board made these determinations on February 2, 2011,1,

19


2012, based on an annual evaluation performed by and recommendations made by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Brown, Canning, Clark, Cummings, Gund, Landgraf, O’Connor, Ruding, Smithburg, Tilton, Tookes and Wrighton, and Ms.Dr. Rieman are “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, based on its application of the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Specifically, the Board determined that theythese 12 Directors were independent because no relationship was identified that would automatically bar them from being characterized as independent, and any relationships identified were not so material as to impair their independence.

In making this determination, the Board considered, among other things, the following relationships, each of which it determined were not material:

 

Mr.
Ÿ

Dr. Brown is a director of Varian Medical Systems, Inc., which in the last three fiscal years has purchased and sold less than $1,000 with Corning.

 

21


Mr. Cummings became an employee of JPMorgan Chase & Co (“JPM”) as of December 2010. JPM and its affiliates provide various investment banking services including underwriting, commercial lending and banking and other financial advisory services, including provision of credit facilities to Corning and its affiliates. Corning’s fees to JPM were approximately $4,200,000, $1,600,000 and $780,000 for each 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Mr. Cummings is not a JPM executive officer under SEC rules, and will have no personal involvement in any JPM services provided to Corning.

Ÿ

Mr. Cummings became an employee of JPMorgan Chase & Co (“JPM”) in December 2010. Mr. Tilton became an employee of JPM in June 2011. JPM and its affiliates provide various investment banking services including underwriting, commercial lending and banking and other financial advisory services, including provision of credit facilities to Corning and its affiliates. Corning’s fees to JPM were approximately $2,600,000, $4,200,000 and $1,600,000 and for each 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Neither Mr. Cummings nor Mr. Tilton are JPM section 16 executive officers under SEC or NYSE rules, and neither has any personal involvement in JPM services provided to or fees paid by Corning.

 

Mr. Smithburg is a director of Abbott Laboratories, to which Corning has sold products in an aggregate amount of approximately $6,000 in the last three fiscal years.

Ÿ

Mr. Tookes is a director of BBA Aviation plc, the parent company of Signature Flight Support (“SFS”), a company that provides aviation support services to Corning. In the last three fiscal years, SFS has provided services to Corning in an aggregate amount of approximately $88,000.

 

Mr. Tookes is a director of BBA Aviation plc, the parent company of Signature Flight Support (“SFS”), a company that provides aviation support services to Corning. In the last three fiscal years, SFS has provided services in an aggregate amount of approximately $230,000. Mr. Tookes is also a director of Harris Corporation and Ryder Systems, each of which have transacted less than $15,000 of business with Corning in the each of the last three fiscal years.

Mr. Wrighton is a director of Cabot Corporation, a company which sold products to Corning in an aggregate amount of approximately $676,000 in 2008, 2009 and 2010; and Brooks Automation, a company which sold an aggregate of approximately $90,000 in products to Corning in the last three fiscal years. Both Cabot Corporation’s sales to and purchases from Dow Corning Corporation (“DCC”) were below $61,000,000 for each of the last three fiscal years. DCC, which is 50% owned by each of Corning and The Dow Chemical Company, is not controlled by Corning, and has a separate board of directors.

Ÿ

Dr. Wrighton is a director of Cabot Corporation, a company which sold products to Corning in an aggregate amount of approximately $650,000 in 2009, 2010 and 2011; and Brooks Automation, a company which sold an aggregate of approximately $123,000 in products to Corning in the last three fiscal years. Both Cabot Corporation’s sales to and purchases from Dow Corning Corporation (“DCC”) were below $61,000,000 for each of the last three fiscal years. DCC, which is 50% owned by each of Corning and The Dow Chemical Company, is not controlled by Corning, and has a separate board of directors.

In determining that each of the above relationships were not material, the Board considered the fact that each of Messrs. Brown, Cummings, Smithburg,Tilton, Tookes and Wrighton’s above relationships are not material, the Board considered: the fact that such relationships arise only from their positionsposition as aan employee or director of the respective companies,companies; that such director has no direct or indirect material interest in any of the transactions between Corning or DCC,its affiliate, as the case may be, and the respective company,company; that none is ana Section 16 executive officer of these companies,companies; that such director had no role or financial interest in any decisions about any of these transactions,transactions; and that such a relationship would not bar independence under the NYSE Listing Standards or Corning’s Director Qualification Standards.

The Board concluded that based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances, none of the above relationships constituted a material relationship with Corning that represents a potential conflict of interest, or otherwise interferes with the exercise by any of these directors of his or her independent judgment from management of Corning.

Messrs. Flaws and Weeks are not independent because they are each executive officers of Corning. Dr. Burns was an executive officer of Dow Corning Corporation (which is 50% owned by Corning) until her December 31, 2011 retirement, and so is not an independent director.

Each member of the Board’s Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees is independent within the meaning of the NYSE Listing Standards, Securities Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 and Corning’s Director Qualification Standards.

20


Communications with Directors

Shareholders and interested parties may communicate concerns to any director, committee member or the Board by writing to the following address: Corning Incorporated Board of Directors, Corning Incorporated, One Riverfront Plaza, MP HQ E2 10, Corning, New York 14831 Attention: Corporate Secretary. Please specify to whom your correspondence should be directed. The Corporate Secretary has been instructed by the Board to promptly forward all correspondence (except advertising, spam, junk mail and other mass mailings, product inquiries and suggestions, resumes, surveys or any unduly hostile, threatening or illegal materials) to the relevant director, committee member or the full Board, as indicated in the correspondence.

22


Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors has determined that three members of the Audit Committee: Messrs. Cummings, Landgraf and Ruding, qualify as Audit Committee Financial Experts.

Policy Regarding Directors Attendance at Annual Meetings

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each director will make every effort to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of our incumbent Board Members attended the 20102011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, with the exception of Messrs. Tookes,Mr. Landgraf Canningwho was unable to attend, Mr. Clark who was appointed to the Board on June 2, 2010,December 6, 2011, and TiltonDr. Burns who was appointed to the Board on November 20, 2010.January 31, 2012.

Related Party Policy and Procedures

Corning has adopted a written policy that addresses related party transactions. A “related party” of Corning includes:

 

a director;

a senior officer;

an immediate family member of a director or senior officer;

a shareholder who owns more than 5% of Corning’s voting securities; or

an entity in which a director, senior officer or a more than 5% shareholder has a substantial ownership interest.

Ÿ

a director;

Ÿ

a senior officer;

Ÿ

an immediate family member of a director or senior officer;

Ÿ

a shareholder who owns more than 5% of Corning’s voting securities; or

Ÿ

an entity in which a director, senior officer or a more than 5% shareholder has a substantial ownership interest.

Under the policy, all related party transactions must be reviewed by the General Counsel or other disinterested officer. Any transaction involving a director is also reviewed, approved or ratified by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Any transaction involving an executive officer is also reviewed, approved or ratified by the Audit Committee. In order for any such transaction to be approved or ratified, the transaction must be shown to further the interest of the Company and have appropriate safeguards established.

All approved or ratified related party transactions shall be reported to the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (in those instances where such committee did not participate in the review, approval or ratification process).

Other Matters

Corning is headquartered in a small community in upstate New York. The Company routinely makes contributions to a number of civic, charitable and cultural institutions that improve the quality of life and increase the resources of thatthe community making it more attractive to employees. In a small community, inevitably employees, including executives and their spouses, serve onhave relationships with the non-profit organizations that receive such contributions from the Company.

In 2010,February 2011, Corning contributed approximately $950,000agreed to construct and lease a new building for the Alternative School for Math and Science (ASMS), a private middle school in Corning, NY, for scholarships, administrative and facility support. ASMS haswith an advanced curriculum with a focusfocusing on science and math.math, located in Corning, New York. The cost for the design, engineering and construction of the new facilities is approximately

21


$21 million to be incurred over several years. The school is open to the public. Children of Corning employees usually represent approximately 50% of the enrollment. Pamela Schneider (Executive Vice President), Mark Rogus (Senior Vice President and Treasurer), Christine Pambianchi, (Senior Vice President, Human Resources), Curt Weinstein (Vice President), Kim Frock Weeks (spouse of Chairman and CEO Wendell Weeks) and Patti Hinman (spouse of Tom Hinman, Senior Vice President) serve on the ASMS board.board of trustees. Ms. Frock Weeks also serves as Administrative Head of School at ASMS, but receives no salary or benefits in this role. Corning expects to increase itsmay make additional contributions to ASMS in the future.

In 2011, Corning also agreed to contribute up to $9.7 million to the Southern Tier Network (STN), a not-for-profit, local development corporation established to build and manage a $12.2 million regional fiber optic network that will create a new high speed broadband infrastructure in Chemung, Schuyler and Steuben Counties of New York. The project will also be funded with $2.2 million coming from the three local counties. This network will offer significant benefits to the region, including connecting public safety towers and 911 centers, providing state-of-the-art telecommunications technology, enhanced broadband offerings to area residents and service to underserved areas of the community, and creating a catalyst for future economic development in the region. Marcia Weber (spouse of James Flaws, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer) and Mark Rogus (Senior Vice President and Treasurer) are on the STN board of directors. Ms. Weber also serves as the school expands.STN Board Chair.

Subject to receipt of appropriate reporting and documentation, the Corning Incorporated Foundation authorized a $4.2 million grant to the Corning-Painted Post Area School District to assist the District in meeting its 2011-2012 budget priorities and to maintain existing educational programs and services across the District. The Corning Incorporated Foundation may make additional contributions in the future to support education in the District over the longer term.

Corning makes annual contributions to the Corning Museum of Glass (CMoG) and the Rockwell Museum of Western Art (Rockwell). Both are located in Corning, New York. In 2011, Corning provided monetary contributions and contributions of services to CMoG and the Rockwell of approximately $26.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Wendell Weeks (Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President), James Flaws (Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer), Jeffrey W. Evenson (Senior Vice President and Operations Chief of Staff), and Mark Rogus (Senior Vice President and Treasurer) serve on the CMoG board of trustees. Denise Hauselt (Vice President, Secretary and Assistant General Counsel) is on the Rockwell board of trustees. Additionally, Corning has approved up to $104 million for expansion and improvement of CMoG facilities, owned by Corning. The expansion funding will take place over three years.

In 2011, Corning made a $500,000 contribution to the Clemens Center (CC), a performing arts center located in Elmira, New York. The funds were used to assist CC with recent renovations to its main theater. Gary Calabrese (Senior Vice President, New Business Development) is on the CC board of trustees.

Code of Ethics

 

23


Code of Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Financial Executives and the Code of Conduct for Directors and Executive Officers, which supplements the Code of Conduct governing all employees and directors. A copy of the Code of Ethics is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix GI and is available on our website at http://www.corning.com/investor_relations/corporate_governance/board_download_library.aspx. We will disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics on our website within four business days of such determination. During 2010,2011, no amendments to or waivers of the provisions of the Code of Ethics were made with respect to any of our directors or executive officers.

22


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Paragraphs (a) and (b) below set forth information about the beneficial ownership of Corning’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2010.2011. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed.

(a) To the knowledge of management, the following owned 5% or more of Corning’s outstanding shares of Common Stock:

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
  Percent of
Class
 

BlackRock, Inc.

   94,546,414(1)   6.05

40 East 52nd Street

   

New York, NY 10022

   

Capital Research Global Investors

   119,953,620(2)   7.7

333 South Hope Street

   

Los Angeles, CA 90071

   

Capital World Investors

   122,830,800(3)   7.9

333 South Hope Street

   

Los Angeles, CA 90071

   

The Growth Fund of America, Inc.

   91,530,000(4)   5.9

333 South Hope Street

   

Los Angeles, CA 90071

   

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
  Percent of
Class
 

BlackRock, Inc.

   112,251,581(1)  7.14%

40 East 52nd Street

   

New York, NY 10022

   

 

(1)Reflects shares beneficially owned by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), according to a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock with the SEC on February 3, 2011,13, 2012, reflecting ownership of shares as of December 31, 2010.2011. BlackRock has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 94,546,414112,251,581 shares. According to the Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock beneficially owned 6.05%7.14% of our common stock as of December 31, 2010.
(2)Reflects shares beneficially owned by Capital Research Global Investors (“CRGI”), a division of Capital Research and Management Company, according to a Schedule 13G filed by CRGI with the SEC on February 11, 2011, reflecting ownership of shares as of December 31, 2010. CRGI, an investment advisor, has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 119,953,620 shares. According to the Schedule 13G, CRGI beneficially owned 7.7% of our common stock as of December 31, 2010. CRGI disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(3)Reflects shares beneficially owned by Capital World Investors (“CWI”), a division of Capital Research and Management Company, according to a Schedule 13G/A filed by CWI with the SEC on February 14, 2011, reflecting ownership of shares as of December 31, 2010. CWI, an investment advisor, has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 122,830,000 shares. According to the Schedule 13G/A, CWI beneficially owned 7.9% of our common stock as of December 31, 2010. CWI disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

24


(4)Reflects shares beneficially owned by The Growth Fund of America, Inc. (“GFA”), an investment company which is advised by Capital Research and Management Company, according to a Schedule 13G/A filed by GFA with the SEC on February 14, 2011, reflecting ownership of shares as of December 31, 2010. GFA has sole voting power with respect to 91,530,000 shares. According to the Schedule 13G/A, GFA beneficially owned 5.9% of our common stock as of December 31, 2010. GFA’s Schedule 13G/A also notes that some of these shares may also be reflected in the filings made by Capital Research Global Investors and/or Capital World Investors.2011.

(b) The number of shares of Corning Common Stock owned by the directors and nominees for directors, by the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) and by all directors and executive officers as a group, as of December 31, 2010,2011, is as follows:

 

Name

  Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership(1)(2)(3)
  Percent of
Class
 

Directors

   

John S. Brown

   139,167    —    

John A. Canning, Jr.

   32,827    —    

Robert F. Cummings, Jr.

   77,194    —    

Gordon Gund

   3,292,477(4)   —    

Carlos M. Gutierrez(5)

   8,631    —    

Kurt M. Landgraf

   23,461    —    

James J. O’Connor

   140,491    —    

Deborah D. Rieman

   120,880    —    

H. Onno Ruding

   133,188    —    

William D. Smithburg

   159,917    —    

Glenn F. Tilton

   439    —    

Hansel E. Tookes II

   76,130    —    

Mark S. Wrighton

   16,724    —    

Named Executive Officers

   

Wendell P. Weeks*

   2,069,073    —    

Peter F. Volanakis**

   1,591,980    —    

James B. Flaws*

   862,770    —    

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   770,177    —    

Kirk P. Gregg

   857,945    —    

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (22 persons)

   11,045,783(6)(7)   .71
*alsoserves as director.
**Mr.Volanakis retired from the Board for Directors on December 1 and as President on January 1, 2011.

Name

 Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership(1)(2)(3)
  Percent of
         Class        
 

Directors

  

John S. Brown

  146,472    —        

Stephanie A. Burns

  0          

John A. Canning, Jr.

  68,314    —        

Richard T. Clark

  685      

Robert F. Cummings, Jr.

  84,499    —        

Gordon Gund

  3,293,250(4)   —        

Kurt M. Landgraf

  30,766    —        

Deborah D. Rieman

  121,435    —        

H. Onno Ruding

  109,825    —        

William D. Smithburg

  160,472    —        

Glenn F. Tilton

  5,553    —        

Hansel E. Tookes II

  83,435    —        

Mark S. Wrighton

  24,029    —        

Named Executive Officers

      

Wendell P. Weeks*

  2,150,510(5)   —        

James B. Flaws*

  953,306    —        

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  631,318    —        

Kirk P. Gregg

  866,719    —        

Lawrence D. McRae

  20,256    —        

Jeffrey Evenson

  8,765    —        

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (21 persons)

  9,332,672(6)(7)   .62%  

*also serves as director.

23


 

(1)

Includes shares of common stock, subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer, granted under Corning’s Incentive Stock Plans as well as options to purchase shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days under Corning’s Stock Option Plans. Messrs. Brown, Canning, Clark, Cummings, Gund, Gutierrez, Landgraf, O’Connor, Ruding, Smithburg, Tilton, Tookes, Wrighton, Weeks, Volanakis, Flaws, Miller, Gregg, McRae and Gregg,Evenson, and Ms.Drs. Burns and Rieman have the right to purchase 25,590;27,849; 441; 0; 8,831; 68,500; 1,276; 6,827; 21,468; 66,390; 32,340;11,090; 27,849; 9,086; 37,849; 27,849; 68; 27,849; 5,993; 1,758,560; 682,924; 491,164; 762,935; 246,056; 0; 25,590; 3,734; 1,564,997; 1,323,118; 633,258; 579,666; 742,281;0; and 66,39037,849 shares, respectively, pursuant to such options. All directors and executive officers as a group hold options to purchase 6,117,3744,670,227 such shares.

25


(2)

Includes shares of common stock, subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer, issued under Corning’s Restricted Stock Plans for IndependentNon-Employee Directors.

(3)

Includes shares of common stock held by JPMorgan Chase & Co. as the trustee of Corning’s Investment Plans for the benefit of the members of the group, who may instruct the trustee as to the voting of such shares. If no instructions are received, the trustee votes the shares in the same proportion as it votes the shares for which instructions were received. The power to dispose of shares of common stock is also restricted by the provisions of the Plans. The trustee holds for the benefit of Messrs. Weeks, Volanakis, Flaws, Miller, Gregg, McRae and Gregg,Evenson, and all directors and executive officers as a group the equivalent of 10,505; 0;10,504; 0; 1,426; 8,784; 5,631; 0; and 27,02226,345 shares of common stock, respectively. It also holds for the benefit of all employees who participate in the Plans the equivalent of 23,451,99721,581,072 shares of common stock (being 1.50%1.42% of the Class).

(4)

Includes 1,650,000 shares held by an irrevocable trust in which Mr. Gund has no pecuniary interest, but for which he is a trustee.

(5)

Includes 381,446 shares held by a revocable trust of which Mr. Gutierrez resigned fromWeeks is the Board on December 31, 2010.beneficiary, and he currently has no voting authority over these shares.

(6)

Does not include 671,848670,082 shares owned by the spouses and minor children of certain executive officers and directors as to which such officers and directors disclaim beneficial ownership.

(7)

As of December 31, 2010,2011, none of our directors or executive officers had pledged any such shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires Corning’s directors and certain of its officers to file reports of their ownership of Corning Common Stock and of changes in such ownership with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Regulations also require Corning to identify in this proxy statement any person subject to this requirement who failed to file any such report on a timely basis.

To Corning’s knowledge, based solely on its review of the copies of such reports furnished to Corning and written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all of our officers, directors and any greater than 10% shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 except that, due to administrative oversight by a third party financial advisor, Mr. Vincent P. Hatton, an officer, filed one late Form 4 on March 29, 2011 with respect to 1,000 shares acquired on August 19, 2010.

Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible to the Board of Directors for executive compensation at Corning (“we”, “us”, “Corning” or the “Company”). The Committee sets the principles guiding the Company’s compensation philosophy, reviews and approves executive compensation levels for executive officers (including cash compensation, equity incentives, benefits and perquisites) and reports its actions to the Board of Directors for review and, as necessary, approval.

What’s New in 2011?

At the 2011 annual shareholders meeting, more than 96% of votes cast supported Corning’s executive compensation program. Both management and the Committee reviewed the advisory vote result for the 2011

24


Say on Pay proposal and found it to be a strong show of support for Corning’s current executive compensation program. In addition, the Company annually reviews compensation-related voting policies of our largest investors to fully understand their preferences and to gauge the level of support for our executive compensation program. As a result, the Company did not make any material changes to the executive compensation program for 2011.

As described in the 2011 proxy statement, the Committee increased the target pay opportunity for the CEO last year, increasing the target market position of Mr. Weeks’ pay from market median to between market median and 75th percentile.

Compensation for six executives is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table this year, instead of compensation paid to the required five executives. Compensation to Dr. Evenson, a newly hired Senior Vice President, exceeds the compensation to select Executive Vice Presidents because of fixed cash retention and sign on payments to Dr. Evenson negotiated as part of his new hire package designed to replace amounts forfeited when he left his previous employer. As a result of fixed payments under his new hire package, Dr. Evenson’s compensation is not as variable and is not as representative of Corning’s annual ongoing executive compensation program for Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”). We determined that the best approach was to expand the group of executives to achieve more consistency in the composition of our NEOs.

In 2011 our financial results fell significantly below target. Since we set rigorous performance goals for 2011, our incentive payouts were sharply reduced:

2011 annual bonus earned at 10% of target for NEOs;

2011 GoalSharing earned at 5.05% of base salary for NEOs;

2011 Cash Performance Units earned at 60% of target;

2011 Stock Option grants are underwater; and

Value of 2011 time-based restricted stock units declined approximately 30% during the year.

Therefore, executive pay aligned with performance. Given that fiscal 2011 was a challenging year for Corning in terms of financial and stock performance, actual 2011 compensation for our NEOs was significantly lower than the prior year. Actual 2011 compensation for our ongoing NEOs was 73% of target (27% below). This compares to 2010 actual compensation for our NEOs of 139% of target (39% above). See pages 27-29 for additional detail.

Executive Summary

BackgroundCompensation Program Reflects Good Governance

Corning has been in existence for over 160 years; with patient investment over many years, management continuity, and a collaborative culture of teamwork across varied businesses each being critical to our long-term success. This means that our management must balance near-term results with long-term success and continuewhile continuing to build long-term value through innovation.

Compensation Program Reflects Good Governance To fulfill this mission, Corning’s “pay-for-performance” philosophy forms the foundation for all decisions regarding executive compensation made by the Committee.

Our executive compensation program has changed over time to reflect evolving governance practices:

We adjust our pay practices as necessary to reflect economic conditions, as evidenced by our decision to suspend annual salary reviews in 2009.2009;

26


Our equity plan prohibits the repricing of stock options in any form without shareholder approval.approval;

Our named executive officersNEOs (and outside directors) are subject to stock ownership guidelines; each exceeded the guideline amountrequirements in 2010.2011;

A clawback policy was adopted in 2007 allowing the Committee to recoup payments based uponon financial results subsequently subject to restatement.restatement;

A hedgingAn anti-hedging policy prohibits officers and directors from trading in options or any Corning stock derivatives or otherwise profiting from short-term speculative swings in the value of Corning stock.stock;

 

25


Benefits under all executive severance and change-in-control agreements entered into after 2004 are limited to 2.99 times the sum of base salary and target bonus.bonus;

Reload stock options were discontinuedeliminated in 2003.2003, as of 2009 no prior stock options granted with a reload feature remained outstanding;

We capped the percentage of cash compensation earned as a retirement benefit under our Executive Supplemental Pension Plan in 2006.2006;

We do not provide tax assistance or tax gross-ups on perquisites.perquisites; and

The Company regularly reviews internal pay equity among the Company’s top executives.

20102011 Performance and Results

Our Annual Operating Priorities for 2010 were:2011 were consistent with prior year themes: protect our financial health; invest in the future; and live our values. These annual objectives are measured by financial performance metrics calculated on a non-GAAP basis (such as adjusted net profit after tax and adjusted earnings per share), financial stability metrics (such as adjusted operating cash flow) and progress towards advancing the innovation portfolio and other key milestones.

In 2011, we reported strong revenue growth, but our profitability was lower than in 2010 due to an increase in the tax rate and the underperformance of our reported financial performance was improved over 2009:Display business and two of our equity companies, Dow Corning and Samsung Corning. Reported results were as follows:

Revenue of $7.9 billion compared to $6.6 billion for 2010; a 19% increase and a record year;

Net profit after tax (“NPAT”) of $3,558$2,805 million compared to $2,008$3,558 million for 2009,2010, a 77% increase;21% decrease;

Earnings per share of $2.25$1.77 compared to $1.28$2.25 per share for 2009,2010, a 76% increase;21% decrease; and

Operating cash flow of $3,835$3,189 million compared to $2,077$3,835 million for 2009,2010, a 85% increase; and17% decrease

Additional considerations when evaluating 2011 performance include:

RevenueTax rates increased significantly, making year-over-year comparisons of $6.6 billion comparedafter-tax results difficult.

Foreign exchange (“FX”) rates in 2011 positively impacted our GAAP earnings. However, the impact on our incentive plans was limited by the collar we have placed on certain FX rates that eliminates potential windfalls or penalties for large FX changes.

Many of our line business units exceeded financial goals.

We increased our global employee headcount by almost 10% (adding approximately 2,600 net employees during the last year) indicating continued investment in Corning’s long-term success.

We continued to $5.4 billion for 2009;have a 23% increase.

Further, we strengthened ourstrong balance sheet. We ended 2010sheet, ending 2011 with cash in excess of debt ofby $3.4 billion, vs. $4.0 billion vs.in 2010 and $1.6 billion in 2009.2009 while at the same time significantly investing in growth through innovation, expansions and acquisitions.

Importance of Equity Companies to Corning

The “Adjustments to 2010 Reported Results” on which 2010 performance-based compensation are based are described starting on page 30 below. A reconciliationGiven our diversified businesses, the history of unique innovations behind our product offerings, and the global nature of our non-GAAP financial measuresoperations, we lack any pure peer companies against which the Committee is able to benchmark. As a result, external survey data cannot take the place of sound business judgment based on specific knowledge of Corning and its leaders. Part of Corning’s success is derived from its investments in several equity companies. Under GAAP, financial measures can be foundCorning’s share of the revenues from these equity companies, totaling more than $5.8 billion in Appendix H2011, is not consolidated into Corning’s net sales. However, Corning’s share of the equity earnings from these companies is included in Corning’s net income, thus also impacting Corning’s market value. Net income from the equity companies is as critical to this Proxy Statement.Corning’s long-term success as the net income from Corning’s wholly-owned companies. Thus, net sales alone do not completely reflect the size and complexity of Corning when compared to other companies.

 

2726


Target Compensation

For 2010, the Committee approved2011, variable pay represented 82% of target total direct compensation for the Named Executive Officers with variable pay representing 84% (on average); total. Total direct compensation consists of long-termbase salary and short-term incentives and base salary,long-term incentives, and excludes benefits and perquisites. Two compensation elements, annual incentive compensation and cash performance units, are earned only if the corporate financial performance goals for the year are met. The value of the remaining long-term incentive components, stock options and restricted stock units, depend directly on our stock price performance.

LOGO

LOGO

Note that the chart above excludes Dr. Evenson. As described earlier, Dr. Evenson is a proxy officer this year based on fixed (non-variable) cash payments negotiated as part of his new hire package. Because Dr. Evenson received a fixed cash payment to replace amounts forfeited when he left his previous employer, his compensation is not representative of the variability in the annual ongoing pay program for NEOs.

Actual Compensation and Related Performance

Our compensation program is designed to pay for performance. Actual compensation earned by the Named Executive OfficersNEOs varies from target from year to year based on the Company’s financial performance and stock price. Actual total direct compensationTotal Direct Compensation for our Named Executive OfficersNEOs and our performance during 20082009 through 20102011 based on Total Shareholder Return (calculated as the annual change in stock price assuming reinvestment of dividend).dividends), Adjusted Net Profit After Taxes and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow are summarized below. Stock

The “Adjustments to 2011 Reported Results” on which 2011 performance-based compensation are based are described starting on page 30 below. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures can be found in Appendix J to this Proxy Statement.

On average, actual total direct compensation for our ongoing NEOs in fiscal year 2011 was far below target (approx. 73% of target),primarily due to the final annual bonus (PIP) paying out at only 10% of target and the long-term cash performance units being earned at 60% of target.

Given that 2011 was a challenging year for Corning, the executive pay program aligned with financial and stock performance by paying out at significantly lower amounts.

27


Note that stock option values are included in the total direct compensation at their fair values.values on the date of grant. These stock options are currently underwater and have no intrinsic value (i.e. the current price of Corning stock is less than the exercise price of the options) at year end. The actual value of these stock options is yet to be determined – such values are subject to vesting and future stock prices that are not possible to predict.

 

    1-Year Total Shareholder Return    

 

Adjusted Net Profit After Taxes ($ in millions)

 

Adjusted Operating Cash Flow ($ in millions)

2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008
1.2% 105.6% -59.8% $2,883 $2,061 $2,251 $2,723 $2,029 $2,056

LOGO

1-Year Total Shareholder Return

 

Adjusted Net Profit After Taxes

($ millions)

 

Adjusted Operating Cash Flow

($ millions)

2011  2010  2009 2011  2010  2009 2011  2010  2009

-31.9%

  1.2%  105.6% $2,636  $2,883  $2,061 $3,582  $2,723  $2,029

 

28LOGO


Notes Regarding Actual Compensation compared to Target Compensation:

 

2010

  

2009

  

2008

•  Base Salaries not subject to performance criteria

 

•  2010 PIP earned at 200% of target

 

•  2010 GoalSharing earned at 7.72% of base salary

 

•  2010 Performance Cash Units earned at 150% of target

 

•  2010 Time-based Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) not subject to performance

 

•  Stock Options indicated at Fair Values (which far exceed current actual values)

  

•  Base Salaries not subject to performance criteria

 

•  2009 PIP earned at 170% of target

 

•  2009 GoalSharing earned at 7.16% of base salary

 

•  2009 Performance Share Units earned at 143% of target

 

•  Time-based RSUs N/A in 2009

 

•  Stock Options indicated at Fair Values (which are less than current actual values)

  

•  Base Salaries not subject to performance criteria

 

•  2008 PIP earned at 25% of target

 

•  2008 GoalSharing earned at 4.28% of base salary

 

•  2008 Performance Share Units earned at 16% of target

 

•  Time-based RSUs N/A in 2008

 

•  Stock Options indicated at Fair Values (which far exceed current actual values)

2011

 

2010

 

2009

•Base Salaries not subject to performance criteria

•2011 PIP earned at 10% of target

•2011 GoalSharing earned at 5.05% of base salary

•2011 Cash Performance Units earned at 60% of target

•2011 Time-based Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) not subject to performance (current actual values approximately 30% below grant date value)

•Stock Options indicated at Fair Values (which far exceed current actual values of $0)

 

•Base Salaries not subject to performance criteria

•2010 PIP earned at 200% of target

•2010 GoalSharing earned at 7.72% of base salary

•2010 Cash Performance Units earned at 150% of target

•2010 Time-based RSUs not subject to performance

•Stock Options indicated at Fair Values (which far exceed current actual values of $0)

 

•Base Salaries not subject to performance criteria

•2009 PIP earned at 170% of target

•2009 GoalSharing earned at 7.16% of base salary

•2009 Performance Share Units earned at 143% of target

•Time-based RSUs N/A in 2009

•Stock Options indicated at Fair Values

In 2010, adjusted Net Profit After Tax (“Adjusted NPAT”) was the financial metric used for annual cash bonuses and adjusted Earnings Per Share (“Adjusted EPS”), and adjusted Operating Cash Flow (“Adjusted Operating Cash Flow”) were the financial metrics for cash performance unit awards earned by the Named Executive Officers. Our 2010 financial results were significantly above the goals established for Corning’s 2010 Performance Incentive Plan (annual cash bonus) and cash performance units awarded under the Corporate Performance Plan. As a result of the strong financial performance, compared to the goals established, actual awards earned by the Named Executive Officers for 2010 were above the target awards established at the start of the year.

28


Information concerning 20102011 short-term and long-term incentives for our Named Executive Officers areNEOs is summarized below:

 

20102011 Compensation Element

 

20102011 Award

Opportunity for
Named Executive Officers
NEOs

 

20102011 Performance

Metrics and
Results

 

20102011 Award Earned

by Named
Executive Officers
NEOs

Annual Cash Bonus —Performance—Performance Incentive Plan

 

Target awards range from 75%65% to 100%90% of base salary for NEOs other than the CEO; target is 140% for the CEO

 

Opportunity can range from 0% to 200% of target awards

 

Adjusted Net Profit After Tax of $2,883 million exceeded maximum (200%) goal of


$2,5002,636 million

 

20102011 target was

$2,260 $2,990 million

 

Maximum 200%10% of target opportunity earned resulting in actual awards ranging from 150% to 200% of base salary for the 5 Named Executive Officers

 

To be paid March 20112012

Annual Cash Bonus —GoalSharing—GoalSharing

 

Target is 5% of base salary

 

Opportunity can range from 0% to 10% of salary

 Weighted average of over 100 GoalSharing Plans in place at Corning—all employees eligible 

7.72%5.05% of base salary

 

To be paid February 20112012

Corporate Performance Plan

Cash Performance Units
(represents 50% of


annual long-term


incentive opportunity)

 

Cash performance unit target awards range from $1$875,000 to

$3 $3.5 million (Dr. Evenson part-year cash value target of $325,000)

 

Opportunity can range from 0% to 150% of target awards

 

Adjusted EPS of $1.82;

2010$1.67; 2011 target
was $1.43 and maximum (150%) goal

was $1.58$1.87

 

Adjusted Operating Cash Flow of $2,723$3,582 million; 20102011 target was $2,127 million and maximum (150%) goal was $2,232$3,504 million

 

Maximum 150%60% of target opportunity earned, resulting in actual awards ranging from $1.5$195,000 to $4.5$2.1 million for the 5 Named Executive Officers6 NEOs

 

Subject to vesting and to be paid February 20132014

Corporate Performance Plan

Stock Options

(represents 25% of


annual long-term


incentive opportunity)

 

Target grant date fair value of stock option guideline awards range from $500,000$437,500 to

$1.5 $1.75 million

(Dr. Evenson part-year value of $162,500)
 

Actual value ultimately realized depends on future market performance of Corning stock and cannot be accurately

assessed now

until exercised
 

Actual grant date fair value of stock options granted for 20102011 performance year ranged from $600,000approximately $155,000 to $1.7$1.71 million

 

Vest ratably over a three-year period (1/
(1/3 each year)

Stock option awards are currently underwater and, thus, have no current value

Corporate Performance Plan

Restricted


Stock Units


(represents 25%


of annual long-term


incentive opportunity)

 

Target grant date fair value of restricted stock units range from $500,000$437,500 to $1.5$1.75 million (Dr. Evenson part-year 2011 value at $162,500)

 

Realized value based, in part, on market performance of stock

 

Actual value ultimately realized depends on future market performance of Corning stock and cannot be accurately

assessed now


until vested
 

Actual grant date fair value ranged from $600,000approximately $162,500 to

$1.61.75 million

 

Vest in February 20132014

Values at December 31, 2011 range from $113,800 to $1.18 million due to decline in stock price during the year

29


Executive Compensation Philosophy—Key Principles

The goal of the Company’s compensation program is to provide competitive and motivational compensation to ensure our success in attracting, developing and retaining our key executive, managerial and technical talent. HavingAttracting and retaining the right talent is critical to supporting and achieving our Annual Operating Priorities.

The Committee’s key compensation principles are as follows:

 

  

Provide a Competitive Base Salary:  The Committee does not believe that all of a Named Executive Officer’san NEO’s annual compensation should be at risk. As a result, the Company pays a competitive base salary to each Named Executive Officer as discussed below.Officer.

 

  

Variable Compensation Should Relate to Corporate Performance: Executive compensationCompensation should reward performance and contribution to both short-term and long-term corporate financial performance and shareholder value.

 

29


  

Team-Based Management Approach:  Corning uses a team-based management approach, so 100% of incentives awarded to Named Executive OfficersNEOs are contingent on achieving a common set of shared goals for Corning’s consolidated financial performance or the performance of Corning stock. The Committee does not establish personal objectives for the CEO or the other Named Executive Officers.NEOs.

 

  

Incentive Compensation Should be a Greater Part of Total Compensation Forfor More Senior Positions:  As our employees assume more responsibilities and have greater opportunity to enhance Company performance and shareholder value, an increasing share of their total compensation package is derived from variable incentive compensation.

 

  

The Interests of Our Executive Group Should be Alignedaligned with Shareholders:  Through the use of stock options and restricted stock units, as well as stock ownership guidelines, we align the long-term interests of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs with those of our shareholders.

Adjustments to 20102011 Reported Results

In 2010,2011, Adjusted NPAT iswas the financial metric used for annual cash bonuses andbonuses. Adjusted EPS and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow arewere the financial metrics for cash performance unit awards earned by the Named Executive Officers. The adjustments made to reported earnings in order to determine Adjusted NPAT, Adjusted EPS, and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow for 20102011 were approved by the Committee in advance and were similar to the adjustments approved in prior years. These adjustments are intended to eliminate potential windfalls or penalties for non-recurring (and often non-cash) charges and gains. This allows theour employees and executives of the Company to focus on improving operational performance, while taking appropriate special actions whenever necessary to benefit the Company and its shareholders. The financial metrics we use for determining annual cash bonuses and cash performance awards are non-GAAP financial measures. Throughout this CD&A, we refer to our adjusted EPS, adjusted NPAT and adjusted operating cash flow, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Appendix J to this proxy statement contains an explanation of how we calculate these measures.

30


Upon the Committee’s review and approval at the beginning of the year, the following special items were to be excluded from reported results to calculate incentives for 2010:2011: (i) one-time charges from financing activities, (ii) gains/losses on debt buybacks, (iii) fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for Japanese yen and Korean won outside a specified range, around budget, (iv) restructuring or impairment charges and credits, (v) non-operating gains and losses, (vi) bankruptcy-related charges at Dow Corning, (vii) asbestos settlement charges,any impact of Pittsburgh Corning settlements, (viii) tax/accounting changes, (ix) discontinued operations, and (x) extraordinary gains/losses.losses; (xi) special dividends from equity ventures; (xii) impact from significant acquisitions or equity ventures; and (xiii) impact of release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Corning had special adjustments in several of these areas in 2010.2011.

 

   NPAT
($ in  millions)
  EPS  Operating Cash Flow
($ in millions)
 

Reported 2010 Results

  $3,558   $2.25   $3,835  

Adjustments:

  

Debt transaction

   19    0.01   

Equity earnings charges

   (120  (0.08 

Insurance proceeds

   (206  (0.13  (259

Deferred Tax Asset valuation allowance release

   56    0.04   

Pittsburgh Corning settlement charges

   (30  (0.02 

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for Japanese Yen and Korean Won outside a range +/- 5% of budget*

   (128  (0.08  (50

Restructuring or impairment charges and credits

   (1   65  

Tax credit from repatriation

   (265  (0.17  (868

Adjusted 2010 Results

  $2,883   $1.82   $2,723  
   NPAT
($ millions)
  EPS  Operating
Cash Flow
($ millions)
 

Reported 2011 Results

  $                2,805   $1.77   $3,189  

Impairment Charges

   83    0.05   

Equity earnings credit

   (74  (0.04 

Contingent liability

   (27  (0.02 

Special Dividends not received (but assumed in approved scale)

     384  

Deferred Tax Asset valuation allowance release

   (26  (0.02 

Pittsburgh Corning settlement charges

   15    0.01   

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for Japanese Yen and Korean Won outside a range +/- 4% of budget*

   (153  (0.09  (61

FX at Corning Treasury Services

     70  

Tax law changes

   13    0.01   

Adjusted 2011 Results

  $2,636   $        1.67   $            3,582  

* 9286 to 10294 Yen per U.S. dollar and 1140 to 1260 Korean won per U.S. dollar in 2010.2011 (narrowed from 5% in 2010 to 4% in 2011).

30


As a result of these adjustments for 2010,2011, Corning’s Adjusted NPAT of $2,883$2,636 million was $675$169 million lower than Corning’s reported GAAP NPAT of $3,558$2,805 million. Corning’s Adjusted EPS of $1.82$1.67 was $0.43$0.10 lower than Corning’s reported GAAP EPS of $2.25.$1.77. Corning’s Adjusted Operating Cash Flow of $2,723$3,582 million was $1,112$393 million lowerhigher than the Company’s GAAP Operating Cash Flow of $3,835$3,189 million. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures can be found in Appendix J to this proxy statement.

Executive Compensation Program–Elements of Compensation

Base Salary

The Committee does not believe that all of a Named Executive Officer’sNEO’s annual compensation should be at risk. As a result, the Company pays a competitive base salary to each Named Executive Officer. Annual salary reviews were reinstated for all salaried employees in 2010, after suspension in 2009. Accordingly in 2010, each of our Named Executive OfficersIn 2011, the CEO received a 4%9% base salary increase, equal to the 2010 merit budget for U.S. salaried employees. In 2010, for the CEO, basepositioning his salary was established belowslightly above the median of the market of the various executiveexternal compensation surveys that the Committee reviews. However, his total direct compensation was positioned around the median of the market. Beginning in 2011, the CEO’sbenchmarks. The other on-going NEOs received a 3.28% base salary will be positioned betweenincrease, consistent with the median and 75th percentile of the benchmarks (discussed below). The Committee views internal equity comparedcorporate salary increase budget applicable to the CEO for the non-CEO Named Executive Officers as a more important consideration in establishing a base salary for these individuals than the external market. As a result of deliberately positioning these base salaries closer to the CEO than do many other companies, the base salaries of the non-CEO Named Executive Officers are positioned within the top quartile when reference is made to the various executive compensation surveys.all U.S. employees.

Annual Incentive / Bonus

Performance Incentive Plan (PIP): The Performance Incentive Plan is used to ensure that the Company’s Named Executive Officers and other eligible employees have the opportunity to receivepays variable cash bonus awards tied to the Company’s annual financial performance. Bonuses will beare higher than target when the Company does well compared to the established financial goals and bonuses willare not be paid when the Company and/or individual failfails to achieve the minimum financial goals. For the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, receipt of any cash bonus under the PIP is based solely on corporate financial performance. Awards under the PIP were based on Adjusted NPAT for 2010.2011.

Each year, the Committee reviews and approves an annual cash bonus target award for each of our Named Executive Officers,NEOs, expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary. The annual bonus targetstarget for the

31


Named Executive Officers in 2010 range from 75% to 100% of the Named Executive Officers’ base salaries CEO is 140% (see footnote (3) to the Summary Compensation Table). These target award percentages were not changed in 2010.The annual bonus targets for the remaining NEOs range from 65% to 90%. The Named Executive Officers may earn from 0% to 200% of their individual bonus target awards depending on actual corporate financial performance.

The individual Named Executive Officer’sNEO’s cash bonus targets are determined by looking at (1) external equity by referring to the total cash opportunities in various external executive compensation surveys for the CEO and (2) internal equity compared to the CEO and each other within the Company for the non-CEO Named Executive OfficersNEOs based on a subjective determination that considers factors such as the position, scope of responsibility, experience, skills and sustained results the executive delivers over time.

The range of 20102011 Performance Incentive Plan goals for Adjusted NPAT were established with the following considerations:

 

The minimum performance goal (0% of target payout) was established at 95%88% of 20092010 actual results. If Adjusted NPAT did not exceed $1,877$2,550 million in 2010,2011, or 83%90% of the 20102011 budget, the Named Executive OfficersNEOs would earn nothing (0%) under the Performance Incentive Plan.PIP.

 

The target performance goal (100% of target payout) was established at 20102011 budget for Adjusted NPAT of $2,260$2,990 million, equal to a 12.5%4% improvement over 20092010 actual results. (Note: An increase in Corning’s tax rate in 2011 compared to 2010 was an important factor in setting this scale.) If Adjusted NPAT met this goal for 2010,2011, the Named Executive OfficersNEOs would earn 100% of their target award under the Performance Incentive Plan.PIP.

 

The maximum performance goal (200% of target payout) was established at 111%110% of budget, or $2,500$3,289 million Adjusted NPAT for 2010,2011, equal to a 24.5%14% improvement over 20092010 actual results. If Adjusted NPAT met or exceeded this goal for 2010,2011, the Named Executive OfficersNEOs would earn 200% of their target award under the Performance Incentive Plan.PIP.

 

31


A “flat spot” concept has been used by the Company for many years. The “flat spot”flat spot is intended to avoid cliffs in the annual bonus plan; in this way, participants are not incented to drive bad behaviorengage in inappropriate behaviors in order to achieve a cliff goal. We find this helps avoid unintended shortfalls or windfalls in actual bonus payouts to plan participants due solely to the uncertainty in establishing a budget and accurately forecasting expected results. In 2010, we returned2011, the width of the “flat spot”flat spot applicable to Adjusted NPAT goals to more historical levels of ± 5%was ±3% of budget, compared to the wider range of ± 10%±5% of budget used in 2010, and ±26% of budget used in 2009 when the global recession made it more difficult to accurately budget Corning’s results.

The actual scale of Adjusted NPAT used in 20102011 is shown below. The “flat spot” concept can be seen in the following chart for payout goals between 90% and 110% of target; for example, a significant change of $222$180 million in Adjusted NPAT would result in relatively small bonus payout adjustments of 90% to 110% of the 20102011 target bonus opportunities.

LOGO

LOGO

For 2010,2011, Actual Adjusted NPAT of $2,883$2,636 million significantly exceededfell well below the maximum NPAT goal, resulting in maximum payouts of 200%10% of target awards for each Named Executive Officer.

 

32


GoalSharing Plan: Almost all of our global employees (hourly and salaried) are eligible to participate in an annual GoalSharing Plan. This variable pay plan generally provides eligible employees an opportunity to earn from 0% to 10% of their annual base salary, based on the actual achievement of specifiedspecific business performance objectives established annually for these plans. This common program design reinforces our team-based culture and provides an incentive for driving continuous improvement across all of our businesses.

 

As for other eligible employees, our Named Executive Officers are eligible for awards of 0% to 10% of base salary under the GoalSharing Plan.

Ÿ

As for other eligible employees, our NEOs are eligible for awards of 0% to 10% of base salary under the GoalSharing Plan.

 

The Named Executive Officers receive cash bonuses equal to the weighted average percentage of all plan payout percentages (the maximum payout being 10%) earned by employees under the GoalSharing plans multiplied by the Named Executive Officer’s base salary.

Ÿ

The NEOs receive cash bonuses equal to the weighted average percentage of all plan participant payout percentages (the maximum payout being 10%) earned by employees under the GoalSharing plans multiplied by the Named Executive Officers’ base salary.

 

The corporate average payout for 2010 was 7.72% of salary.

Ÿ

The corporate average payout for 2011 GoalSharing was 5.05% of salary.

 

Amounts earned under this plan are reported along with the Performance Incentive Plan bonus in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Ÿ

Amounts earned under the GoalSharing plan are reported along with the Performance Incentive Plan bonus in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Discretionary Bonus: Effective January 1,Dr. Evenson joined Corning in June 2011. As part of his offer to join Corning, Dr. Evenson is eligible for cash sign on and retention payments of $1.6 million in 2011, Peter F. Volanakis, our President$0.8 million in 2012 and Chief Operating Officer, retired after 28 years$0.8 million in 2013. These fixed cash payments replace unvested long-term incentives forfeited by Dr. Evenson as a result of distinguished service. In July, the Committee approved a discretionary bonusaccepting Corning’s offer of $1,000,000employment. The $1.6 million cash payment in recognition of Mr. Volanakis’ long service2011 and future payments in 2012 and 2013 are not tied to any performance, but are tied to Dr. Evenson’s continued employment with Corning, as future payments are forfeited if he voluntarily leaves Corning prior to the Company and for the retention of his services through year end.vesting dates.

32


Long-Term Incentives

Corporate Performance Plan: We award long-term incentives annually to the Executive Group (approximately 200 employees) under our Corporate Performance Plan. For the 20102011 performance year, we implementedprovided a new plan design composed of atarget mix of 50% cash performance units, 25% stock options and 25% time-based restricted stock units (previously the mix was 50% stock options and 50% performance shares).units. This new plan design was implemented to reduce the number of stock options in the long-term incentive plan design and to reduce the total number of shares used in the plan, by balancing cash with equity incentives.

The targeted long-term incentive value for the CEO was determined by applying Committee judgment after referring to the median target total direct compensation (base salary + target bonuses + target long-term incentives) of the various executive compensation surveys we look at and subtracting our CEO’s base salary and target bonuses from that total. Targeted long-term incentive values for the non-CEO Named Executive Officers are then established by using judgment to establish the desired internal pay equity in comparison to the CEO, subject to the Company achieving the required targeted financial performance.

Cash Performance Units: Awards of cash performance units may range from 0% to 150% of the target award provided to each executive based on the Company’s actual annual results compared to the predetermined annual financial goals set by the Committee.

 

Given the high level of uncertainty associated with growing through innovation and the volatility of the markets we operate in, we have difficulty setting multi-year goals in advance.

Ÿ

Given the high level of uncertainty associated with growing through innovation and the volatility of the markets we operate in, it is difficult for the Company to set certain multi-year goals.

 

As a result, we use a one-year performance period for calculating the number of performance units that can be earned under the Corporate Performance Plan.

Ÿ

As a result, we use a one-year performance period for calculating the number of cash performance units that can be earned under the Corporate Performance Plan.

 

After the one-year performance period, awards are subject to an additional 2-year vesting period extending to February 1, 2013.

Ÿ

After the one-year performance period, 2011 awards are subject to an additional two-year vesting period extending to February 1, 2014.

 

In total, this three-year timeframe from the start of the performance period assists the Company in retaining its critical talent, since the cash performance units are subject to forfeiture provisions during the vesting period (except for termination of employment resulting from situations such as death, disability or retirement).

Ÿ

In total, this three-year timeframe from the start of the performance period assists the Company in retaining its critical talent, since the cash performance units are subject to forfeiture provisions during the vesting period (except for termination of employment resulting from situations such as death, disability or retirement).

 

Cash performance units are payable in cash (or at the Committee’s discretion, in stock) at the end of the vesting period.

33


Ÿ

Cash performance units are payable in cash (or at the Committee’s discretion, in stock) at the end of the vesting period.

For the 20102011 performance year, cash performance unit awards under the Corporate Performance Plan were based upon two equally weighted goals: (1) Adjusted EPS and (2) Adjusted Operating Cash Flow. The minimum (0%), target (100%), and maximum (150%) levels for Adjusted EPS and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow for the 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan were as follows:

LOGO

LOGO

Two goals were selected because it is important to the long-term success of the Company to focus attention on generating cash, in addition to improving Adjusted EPS. Both the Company and the Committee believe that these metrics are appropriate for motivating and rewarding behavior that leads to improvement in operating performance and supports shareholder value over time.

Actual results for 2010,2011, at $1.82$1.67 of Adjusted EPS (150%(13% of target) and $2,723$3,582 million of Adjusted Operating Cash Flow (150%(107% of target), were significantly aboveresulted in awards being earned at only 60% of target expectations under the Plan. As a result, the maximum 150% of the target performance unit awards were earned for 20102011 performance (subject to an additional two-year vesting period).

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units: The 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan incorporates time-based restricted share units that vest 100% after three years (in February 2013)2014). The use of stock options inAt its January 3, 2011 meeting, the plan design was correspondingly reduced.

Awards under this plan for the 2010 performance year wereCommittee approved and made in December 2009 and are reported in 2009 as Stock Awards in the Summary Compensation Table. Beginning in 2011, the annual grant dateawards of restricted stock units will be moved forward to coincide with and occur in the performance year.Named Executive Officers under the Corporate Performance Plan. Dr. Evenson received his prorated time-based restricted stock units after his start date on July 1, 2011.

33


In addition, we occasionally grant restricted stock units for purposes of recognition or for special retention situations. While the Named Executive OfficersThe NEOs did not receive any time basedtime-based restricted stock awards for these purposes in 2009, 2010 or 2010, shares were awarded to three of the Named Executive Officers in 2008.2011.

Stock Options: At its December 2009January 3, 2011 meeting, the Committee approved annual awards of stock options to the Named Executive Officers under the Corporate Performance Plan. The stock option awards have staggered grant dates: 1/3 of the total option grant awarded at the December 2009 Committee meeting,on January 3, 2011, 1/3 of the total option grant awarded on the first day the New York Stock Exchange is open in January 2010February 1, 2011, and 1/3 of the total option grant awarded on the first day the New York Stock Exchange is open in February 2010.March 1, 2011. These stock options vest ratably over a three-year period (1/3 each year). Dr. Evenson received his prorated stock options after his start date on July 1, 2011.

For the past eight years, the Committee has staggered the grants of stock options to avoid basing awards on a single grant date; the Committee believes that this practice is fair and equitable given the historical volatility of Corning’s stock price. However, this approach results in the value of stock option grants granted for the 2010 performance year being reported in the Summary Compensation Table in 2009 and 2010.

Beginning in 2011, Corning will change the timing of stock option grants to align the Committee’s intended grants with disclosure requirements; staggered grant dates will be moved forward to January, February and March 2011 so that all stock option grants will occur in the performance year.

We use the New York Stock Exchange closing price of Corning stock on the date of grant as the grant price of the stock options.

 

34


In addition to stock options granted during the year, there were 19,351,282 stock options originally awarded during the telecom boom in 2000 (with exercise prices significantly above Corning’s current stock price) that expired and were forfeited and canceled during 2010. The forfeiture of these compensation awards further reinforces the strong link between pay and performance, in that incentive pay awards are not earned or paid if the Company does not perform.

Other Benefit and Plans

Employee Benefits: Our Named Executive OfficersNEOs are eligible for the same employee benefit plans in which all other eligible U.S. salaried employees participate. These plans include medical, dental, life insurance, disability, matching gifts and qualified defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans. We also maintain nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans with the same general plan features and benefits as our qualified retirement plans for all U.S. salaried employees affected by tax law compensation, contribution and/or deduction limits.

Perquisites and Other Benefits: In addition to the standard benefits available to all eligible U.S. salaried employees, the Named Executive OfficersNEOs are eligible for the following additional perquisites and other benefits:

Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (“ESPP”): We maintain a nonqualified executive supplemental pension plan for approximately 30 active participants, including all of the Named Executive Officers.NEOs. In 2006, we capped the percentage of cash compensation earned as a retirement benefit under our ESPP at a maximum 50% of Final Average Pay for 25 years of service or more. The definition of pay used to determine benefits includes base salary and annual cash bonuses. Long-term cash or equity incentives are not included and do not impact retirement benefits. Executives must have 10 or more years of service to be vested under this plan. All of the NEOs except for Dr. Evenson are currently vested under this plan. For additional details of the benefits and plan features of the ESPP, please refer to the section entitled “Retirement Plans” in this proxy statement.

We maintain an ESPP to:

 

Reward and retain the long-service individuals that are critical to executing Corning’s growing through innovation strategy. Most participants under the plan retire from Corning with more than 20 to 30 years of service, and the Company believes that long service with the Company is a vital ingredient that will continue to contribute to Corning’s long-term success.

Ÿ

Reward and retain the long-service individuals that are critical to executing Corning’s growing through innovation strategy. Most participants under the plan retire from Corning with more than 20 to 30 years of service, and the Company believes that long service with the Company is a vital ingredient that contributes to Corning’s long-term success.

 

Provide a reliable and competitive retirement benefit that is independent of other forms of compensation. Given the inherent volatility of performance-based awards and equity incentives, the Company believes that providing a reliable, competitive form of retirement income (independent of other elements of compensation) to participants under this plan is consistent with its focus of balancing short and long-term interests while growing through innovation.

Ÿ

Provide a reliable and competitive retirement benefit that is independent of other forms of compensation. Given the inherent volatility of performance-based awards and equity incentives, the Company believes that providing a reliable, competitive form of retirement income (independent of other elements of compensation) to participants under this plan is consistent with its focus on balancing short- and long-term interests while growing through innovation.

While we seek to maintain well-funded qualified retirement plans, we do not fund our nonqualified benefit plans.

Executive Allowance Program: In 2010,2011, we provided the Named Executive Officers with an annual executive allowance that could be used only for limited personal aircraft rights on corporate aircraft and home security. Each Named Executive OfficerNEO is responsible for all taxes on any imputed income resulting from this program.

34


We closely monitor total business and personal usage on our planes and seek to keep all personal usage at a low percentage of total usage. The Committee believes that a well-managed program of limited personal aircraft rights, particularly given the limited commercial flight options available in the Corning, New York area, provides an extremely important benefit at a reasonable cost to the Company. The Committee believes this helps Corning attract and retain its senior executive talent while also enabling our Named Executive Officers to continue to conveniently and safely conduct and discuss business operations even while travelling for personal reasons. For additional details, refer to footnotes relating to “All Other Compensation” included with the Summary Compensation Table.

35


Executive Physical: Members of the Executive Group in the U.S., including the Named Executive Officers,NEOs, are eligible for an annual physical exam.

Executive Severance Agreements: We have entered into severance agreements, or have committed to enter into a severance agreement in the case of Dr. Evenson, with each Named Executive Officer.NEO. The severance agreements provide clarity for both the Company and the executive if the executive is fired.executive’s employment terminates. By having an agreement in place, we intend to avoid the uncertainty, negotiations and potential litigation that may otherwise occur at the time of termination. The agreements are competitive with market practices at many other large companies and are helpful in retaining senior executives. Additional details can be found under “Arrangements with Named Executive Officers”.Officers.”

Executive Change-in-Control Agreement: The Committee believes that it is in the best interests of shareholders, employees and the communities in which the Company operates to ensure an orderly process if a change in control of the Company were to occur. The Committee believes that it is important to prevent the loss of key management personnel (who would be difficult to replace) that may occur in connection with a potential or actual change in control of the Company. We have thus provided each Named Executive OfficerNEO, and have committed to do so with Dr. Evenson, with change in control agreements (separate from the severance agreements described above). The change in control agreements generally have a double trigger severance provision (i.e. the executive’s employment must be terminated following a change in control). Additional details about the specific agreements can be found under “Arrangements with Named Executive Officers”.

These severance and change-in-control agreements are intended to provide stability to the Company and the Named Executive OfficersNEOs at critical times. The Company considers these agreements necessary to attract and retain senior executives, and the terms of these agreements are not a part of the annual compensation determination for our Named Executive Officers. Effective for all executive severance agreements and change in control agreements entered into after July 21, 2004, the Committee and the Board of Directors approved a policy to limit benefits that may be provided to an executive under any new agreement to 2.99 times the executive’s annual compensation of base salary plus target bonus (the “Overall Limit”). All of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs except Dr. Evenson executed severance and change in control agreements prior to July 21, 2004 and, are not affected by the Overall Limit. However, all agreements entered into with new officers since July 2004 are subject to the Overall Limit.

Consulting Agreement with Mr. Volanakis:  Effective January 1, 2011, Corning entered into a two-year consulting agreement with Mr. Volanakis, our former President and COO. For his continued advice and assistance through December 31, 2012, Mr. Volanakis will receive compensation of $903,000, to be paid in eight quarterly installments of $112,875 each, beginning March 31, 2011, and be reimbursed for reasonable travel and business expenses incurred at Corning’s request. The transition agreement requires Mr. Volanakis to adhere to certain confidentiality, non-compete and non-solicitation requirements.

Role of Compensation Consultants

The Committee has the authority to retain and terminate a compensation consultant, and to approve the consultant’s fees and all other terms of the engagement. The Committee currently retains an executive compensation expert from Aon Hewitt Associates as its independent consultant; this selection was made without the input or influence of management.

 

Ÿ

During 2011, Aon Hewitt provided other human resource services to the Company, but the Aon Hewitt executive compensation expert does not provide any other services to the Company. We do not believe that limited services provided by separate groups within Aon Hewitt, on discrete projects (e.g., Leadership Development in China) for the benefit of Corning’s general employee population, affect the independent advice that the Committee receives from its consultant related to executive compensation

During 2010, Hewitt Associates provided other human resource services to the Company, but the Hewitt executive compensation expert does not provide any other services to the Company. We do not believe that limited services provided by separate groups within Hewitt Associates, on discreet non-recurring projects, (e.g. Leadership Development in China) for the benefit of Corning’s general employee population, affect the independent advice that the Committee receives from its consultant related to executive compensation.

Ÿ

In 2011, fees for Aon Hewitt totaled $466,283 of which $34,790 was related to compensation consulting services provided to the Committee by its independent consultant. Of the remaining $431,493 fees, $175,078 related to Aon brokerage services related to insurance and $256,415 related to services provided in China for discreet projects such as Leadership Development.

 

3635


During 2010, Aon Corp., which also does work for Corning, acquired Hewitt Associates. In 2010, fees for Aon/Hewitt totaled $190,690, of which $25,847 was related to compensation consulting services provided to the Committee by its independent consultant.

The consultant advises the Committee on all matters related to the compensation of the named executive officersNEOs and assists the Committee in interpreting the Consultant’s data as well as data received from the Company. Specifically, the Compensation Committee requested the Compensation Consultant provide it with the following assistance in 2010:2011:

 

Review and provide feedback on the executive compensation proposals and any short- or long-term incentive compensation plan design changes, as applicable, developed by the Company for review and consideration.

Ÿ

Review and provide feedback on the executive compensation proposals and any short- or long-term incentive compensation plan design changes, as applicable, developed by the Company for review and consideration;

 

Attend Compensation Committee meetings, including the December meeting when annual compensation decisions are reviewed regarding the Named Executive Officers and the other 180+ members of the Executive Group.

Ÿ

Attend Compensation Committee meetings, including the December meeting when annual compensation decisions are reviewed regarding the NEOs and the other 200+ members of the Executive Group;

 

Provide feedback to the Compensation Committee regarding market trends and practices and provide informed opinions regarding Corning’s compensation practices, policies and executive pay levels based on the Compensation Consultant’s experience.

Ÿ

Provide feedback to the Compensation Committee regarding market trends and practices and provide informed opinions regarding Corning’s compensation practices, policies and executive pay levels based on the Compensation Consultant’s experience;

 

Review and provide feedback to recommendations developed by Corning’s Senior Vice President, Global Compensation & Benefits, and provide the Compensation Consultant’s opinion on the annual pay levels established for Corning’s CEO and other Named Executive Officers.

Ÿ

Review and provide feedback to recommendations developed by Corning’s Senior Vice President, Global Compensation & Benefits, and provide the Compensation Consultant’s opinion on the annual pay levels established for Corning’s CEO and other NEOs;

 

Review and provide feedback to any changes proposed to any Corning plan or agreement that affects any member of Corning’s Executive Group.

Ÿ

Review and provide feedback to any changes proposed to any Corning plan or agreement that affects any member of Corning’s Executive Group;

 

Recommend changes in compensation paid to independent directors.

Ÿ

Recommend changes in compensation paid to non-employee directors; and

 

Ÿ

When requested by the Compensation Committee Chair, attend the Executive Session of independent directors to explain any compensation plan or program changes, or provide his opinion on executive pay levels.

When requested by the Compensation Committee Chairman, attend the Executive Session of independent directors to explain any compensation plan or program changes, or provide his opinion on executive pay levels.

Role of Executive Management in the Executive Compensation Process

Corning’s Senior Vice President (“SVP”), Global Compensation and Benefits, working closely with other members of Corning’s Human Resources, Legal and Finance departments, is responsible for designing and implementing executive compensation and discussing significant proposals or topics impacting executive compensation at the Company with the Committee. The SVP, Global Compensation and Benefits formulates each element of the targeted total compensation recommendations for all of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs and reviews the recommendations for each of the non-CEO Named Executive Officers with the CEO. The Named Executive OfficersNEOs do not recommend or suggest individual compensation actions that benefit them personally.

 

The CEO may propose any adjustments he thinks appropriate prior to submission to the Committee.

Ÿ

The CEO may propose any adjustments he thinks appropriate prior to submission to the Committee.

 

The recommendation for the CEO’s compensation is not discussed or reviewed with the CEO prior to the Committee’s review and the CEO is not present when the SVP, Global Compensation and Benefits reviews the CEO compensation recommendation with the Committee.

Ÿ

The recommendation for the CEO’s compensation is not discussed or reviewed with the CEO prior to the Committee’s review and the CEO is not present when the SVP, Global Compensation and Benefits reviews the CEO compensation recommendation with the Committee.

 

The Committee receives management’s recommendations for the compensation plan performance metrics and sets the final targets for the year.

Ÿ

The Committee receives management’s recommendations for the compensation plan performance metrics and sets the final targets for the year.

The CEO and Chief Administrative Officer are invited to attend Committee meetings, although they leave the room during discussions and deliberations of individual compensation actions affecting them personally. The Chief Financial Officer has only attended the annual Committee meeting to review the CD&A; however, he is provided

37


with a copycopies of the Committee meeting materials that are mailed in advance to all Committee members as well as a copy of the minutes prepared after the meeting.meetings. The SVP, Human Resources began attendingalso attends Committee meetings in October 2010.meetings.

36


Comparator Companies for 20102011 Compensation Review Conducted in December 20102011

The Company currently participates in and uses three general executive compensation surveys for Named Executive OfficerNEO positions.

 

Mercer S&P 500 Executive Survey;

Ÿ

Mercer S&P 500 Executive Survey;

 

Towers Watson Executive Survey; and

Ÿ

Towers Watson Executive Survey; and

 

Radford (Aon) Executive Survey.

Ÿ

Equilar Top 25 Survey.

In addition to the three general surveys, we also use proxy data obtained from service providers, such as Equilar, Inc., to review the actual compensation levels of named executive officers at companies in a variety of manufacturing and service industries that are similar in size or have similar characteristics to corningCorning (the “Comparator Companies”). The Comparator Companies used to establish 20102011 compensation were reviewed by the Committee in December 20092010 and can be found in Corning’s prior year CD&A.

Internal equity compared to the CEO for the non-CEO Named Executive OfficersNEOs is a more important consideration in establishing a base salary and total direct compensation for these individuals than the external market. As a result of deliberately positioning these base salaries and total direct compensation closer to that of the CEO than do many other companies, the total pay of the non-CEO Named Executive OfficersNEOs continue to be positioned within the top quartile when reference is made to the various executive compensation surveys.

Given our diversified businesses, the history of unique innovations behind our product offerings, and the global nature of our operations, we lack any pure peer companies against which the Committee is able to benchmark. As a result, external survey data cannot take the place of sound business judgment based on specific knowledge of Corning and its leaders. Part of Corning’s success is derived from its investments in several equity companies. For example, Corning’s share of the revenues from these equity companies (greater than $5.0 billion in 2010) is not consolidated into Corning’s net sales. However, Corning’s share of the equity earnings from these companies is included in Corning’s net income. Net income from the equity companies is as critical to Corning’s long-term success as the net income from Corning’s wholly-owned companies. Thus, net sales alone do not completely reflect the size and complexity of Corning when compared to other companies. We look at general compensation surveys and proxy data from companies in a variety of manufacturing and service industries that are similar in size or have similar financial characteristics to Corning (the “Comparator Companies” found below). However, the information gleaned from these surveys and proxy data is used only as a reference point in the Committee’s determination of establishing the targeted total pay of the Named Executive Officers. Such data is not used as a specific benchmark or to target a specific percentile of the market in establishing our non-CEO Named Executive Officer’sNEO’s compensation.

In developing the list of 3132 Comparator Companies for the December 20102011 Committee review of compensation, the Company identified publicly-traded manufacturing and service companies that met the following general screening criteria:

 

Revenues in the range of $5 billion to $12 billion, with median revenues of approximately $9 billion.

Ÿ

Revenues in the range of $5 billion to $12 billion, with median revenues of approximately $10 billion;

 

More than 15,000 employees.

Ÿ

More than 15,000 employees;

 

Market capitalization above $6 billion.

Ÿ

Market capitalization above $6 billion; and

 

38


Excluded all companies in industries markedly different from Corning such as banking, financial services, airlines, railroads and retail.

Ÿ

Excluded all companies in industries markedly different from Corning such as banking, financial services, airlines, railroads and retail.

 

Air Products & Chemicals Inc.

  Monsanto CoMotorola Mobility Holdings Inc.
Alcon

Applied Materials Inc.

Paccar Inc
Baker Hughes Inc.

  Parker Hannifin Corp.

Becton Dickinson & Co.

PPG Industries

Boston Scientific Corp.

  Praxair Inc
Boston Scientific Corp.Precision Castparts Corp.

Campbell Soup CoCo.

  Qualcomm Inc
Covidien Ltd.

CenturyLink Inc.

  Quest Diagnostics Inc.
Cummins Inc.

Covidien Ltd.

  RogersQwest Communications IncInt’l Inc.
Danaher Corp

Cummins Inc.

  Sara Lee Corp

Danaher Corp

Seagate Technology

Dover Corp.

  Sherwin Williams Co.

Eaton Corp

  Stryker Corp.Stanley Black & Decker Inc.

Ecolab Inc.

  Symantec Corp.TE Connectivity Ltd.

Goodrich Corp.

  Texas Instruments Inc

H. J. Heinz Company

Textron Inc.

Micron Technology Inc.

  Thermo FisherFischer Scientific Inc.
ITT Corp

Monsanto Co

  Tyco Electronics Ltd
Mattel Inc.Western Digital Corp.

37


The latest information reviewed by the Committee in December 20102011 was based on proxy data filed with calendar year-end 20092010 or fiscal year-ends in early 20102011 and was used to establish target pay levels for 2011.2012.

 

Peer Group

  Revenues
($Millions)
   Net
Income
($Millions)
  Total
Assets
($Millions)
   Fiscal
Year-End
Market
Capitalization
($Millions)
   Number
of Full-
Time
Employees
 

50th Percentile

  $8,956    $714   $11,129    $13,525     27,000  

75th Percentile

  $10,461    $1,130   $15,563    $19,789     35,150  

MINIMUM

  $5,431    $(3,100 $4,324    $6,755     15,200  

MAXIMUM

  $11,873    $2,098   $27,445    $75,131     78,000  

Focus Company

         

CORNING - 2010

  $6,632    $3,276   $25,833    $30,541     26,200  

Anticipated Changes in Compensation Practices for 2011

The current compensation programs have been in place for several years. Our programs are reviewed and assessed regularly and changes are made as necessary to meet Company objectives or satisfy changing legal and/or regulatory requirements.

Starting in 2010, Corning modified its long-term incentive program to award performance units for 50% of the target value, stock options for 25% of the target value and time-based restricted stock units for 25% of the target value. Further the performance units were denominated and will be payable in cash, rather than in share units. These plan design changes and the actual plan awards for 2010 were approved at the December 2009 Committee meeting.

Mr. Weeks’ 2010 target direct compensation was established by the Committee in December, 2009 at approximately $8.2 million. The three surveys and the proxy data reviewed by the Committee at that time indicated that median total direct compensation for Mr. Weeks’ position was $8.2 million, on average. In December 2010, the Committee reassessed the desired pay positioning of the CEO given the pending retirement of our COO (which became effective on January 1, 2011). Commencing in July 2010, operational leaders began

39


to report directly to the CEO. In addition, Mr. Weeks has been instrumental in successfully gaining new commercial opportunities for Corning’s new businesses, such as Corning® Gorilla® glass. As a result, the Committee, after consultations with its independent consultant and the other members of the Board of Directors, decided to increase our CEO’s 2011 pay opportunity. Effective with the 2011 performance year, Mr. Weeks’ target total direct compensation, excluding benefits and perquisites, was increased as follows:

Elements of CEO Compensation

  2010 Target  2011 Target

Base Salary

  $1,071,000  $1,171,000

Performance Incentive Plan Target

  100% of Base Salary
$1,071,000
  140% of Base Salary
$1,639,400

GoalSharing Target

  $53,550  $58,550

Long-Term Incentive Award Target

  $6,000,000  $7,000,000

Total Direct Compensation

  $8,195,550  $9,868,950
Peer Group  Revenues
($Millions)
   Net Income  Total
Assets
($millions)
   Fiscal
Year-End
Market
Capitalization
($millions)
   Number
of Full-
Time
Employees
 

50th Percentile

  $10,273    $933   $13,453    $13,814     30,401  

75th Percentile

   11,528     1,071    17,228     20,069     39,775  

MINIMUM

   6,090     (1,065  4,872     6,499     13,000  

MAXIMUM

   13,966     3,247    30,572     80,061     89,000  

CORNING – 2011

  $7,890    $2,805   $27,848    $19,693     28,800  

Mr. Weeks’ new target total direct compensation of approximately $9.9 million provides a balance between fixed and variable pay, as well as short-term and long-term goals, and was positioned between the median and 75th percentile of the various benchmarks the Committee reviews.reviewed. On average, median total direct compensation reported in the surveys and the proxies was $8.2$8.5 million and 75th percentile total direct compensation was $10.3$11 million. The remainingother Named Executive OfficerOfficers’ target total direct compensation remains positioned in the top quartile, consistent with past practice.

Anticipated Changes in Compensation Practices for 2012

Due to an uncertain economic outlook, Corning decided to delay the effective date for executive merit salary reviews by 3 months from January 1, 2012 to around April 1, 2012. Also, beginning in January 2012, grants of stock options will cliff vest 100% after three years, rather than ratably over three years. Currently, we do not anticipate making any other significant changes to our total executive compensation program in 2011.2012.

Additional Information

Compensation Risk Analysis

Corning does not use compensation policies or practices that create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes generally the compensation policies and practices that apply to executive and management employees throughout the Company. A cross-functional team with representatives from Human Resources, Legal, Finance and Risk Management assessed Corning’s compensation policies and practices from a risk-taking perspective, and reviewed its conclusions with the Compensation Committee. This assessment considered, among other things:

 

The mix of cash and equity payouts tied to both short-term financial performance and long-term value creation.

Ÿ

The mix of cash and equity payouts tied to both short-term financial performance and long-term value creation;

Ÿ

The time vesting requirements in our long-term incentive plans, which help align the interests of employees to long-term stakeholders;

Ÿ

The use of financial performance metrics that are readily monitored and reviewed;

Ÿ

The use of common performance metrics for incentives across Corning’s management team and all eligible employees, with corporate results impacting the compensation of all Corning employees;

Ÿ

The use of a “flat spot” in our annual incentive plan that is intended to avoid potential bad behavior around achieving cliff goals;

Ÿ

Capped payout levels for both annual incentives and performance unit awards;

Ÿ

Our stock ownership requirements for NEOs;

Ÿ

The Company’s clawback and anti-hedging policies; and

Ÿ

Multiple levels of review and approval of awards.

 

The time vesting requirements in our long-term incentive plans, which help align the interests of employees to long-term shareholders.

 

The use of financial performance metrics that are readily monitored and reviewed.

The use of common performance metrics for incentives across Corning’s management team and all eligible employees, with corporate results impacting the compensation of all Corning employees.

The use of a “flat spot” in our annual incentive plan that is intended to avoid incenting cliff goals and to prevent unintended shortfall or windfalls due to the difficulty in accurately forecasting financial results.

Capped payout levels for both annual incentives and performance unit awards.

Our stock ownership requirements for Named Executive Officers.

The Company’s clawback and hedging policies.

Multiple levels of review and approval of awards.

 

4038


“Reload” Stock Options

The reload feature is no longer included in any Corning stock option grants made on or after February 28, 2003. No prior stock options granted with a reload feature remain outstanding.

“Clawback” Policy

In 2007, the Board adopted a policy that gives the Compensation Committee the sole and absolute discretion to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to certain Executive Officers and other key employees where such payment was based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Based on its review and judgment, the Committee may seek to recover any amount that it determines was received inappropriately by these individuals.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Named Executive OfficersNEOs and independent directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines. All NEOs or directors in their role for at least 5 years meet or exceed the ownership requirement. The ownership guidelines are as follows:

 

Chief Executive Officer

5x Base Salary
Named Executive Officers

NEOs other than the CEO Non-employee Directors

  

5x Base Salary

3x Base Salary

Independent Directors

5x Annual Cash Retainer

Hedging Policy

We have established a policy that noprohibits any member of the Officer Group or any director may sellfrom selling or buybuying publicly traded options on Corning securities,stock, or tradetrading in any Corning stock derivatives. Additionally, these individuals may not engage in transactions in which he or she may profit from short-term speculative swings in the value of Corning stock utilizing “short sales” or “put” or “call” options.

Restatement of 2009 Compensation for Named Executive Officers

In the 2010 Summary Compensation Table, we restated 2009 total compensation by correcting the approach used to disclose the value of cash performance units. Last year the target value of cash performance units awarded to Named Executive Officers in December 2009 for the 2010 performance year was included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan column as part of 2009 compensation (as described in Footnote (3) to that Summary Compensation Table). This led to an overstatement of 2009 reported compensation. This year, we replaced the target values previously disclosed in 2009 with the actual values earned for the 2010 performance year to reflect current disclosure requirements and report earned values in the performance year.

Compensation Deductibility

As a matter of practice, the Committee intends to set performance-based goals annually under the Company’s various variable compensation plans and to deduct compensation paid under these plans and gains realized from stock options to the extent consistent with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. However, the Committee may conclude that paying non-deductible compensation (such as some time-based restricted stock) is consistent with our shareholder’s best interests. Corning’s current performance-based incentive plans (including the annual cash bonuses paid under the Performance Incentive Plan and stock options and cash performance units awarded under the Corporate Performance Plan) are operated in compliance with Section 162(m) to ensure that compensation paid under those programs is deductible.

Accounting Implications

In designing our total compensation and benefit programs, we review the accounting implications of our decisions. We seek to deliver cost-effective compensation and benefit programs that meet both the needs of the

41


Company and our employees. The Committee and the Company, while always cognizant of the accounting expense ascribed to various forms of cash compensation, benefits and equity awards, do not determine the respective amounts of awards to various executives and employees solely on the basis of the schedule of accounting expense recognition of such awards. The disclosed values of cash and equity long-term incentive awards are based on the accounting cost of awards covering multiple performance periods and historical grant prices that could be higher or lower than current stock prices. In addition, actual performance and the vesting/exercise dates of various awards have a dramatic impact on the actual value of awards received by plan participants.

39


Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible to the Board of Directors and our shareholders for executive compensation at Corning (“we”, “us”, “Corning” or the “Company”). The Committee sets the principles guiding the Company’s compensation philosophy, reviews and approves executive compensation levels (including cash compensation, equity incentives, benefits and perquisites for executive officers) and reports its actions to the Board of Directors for review and, as necessary, approval. The Committee is responsible for interpreting Corning’s executive compensation plans and programs. In the event of any questions or disputes, the Committee may use its judgment and/or discretion to make final administrative decisions regarding these plans and programs. It is our practice that all compensation decisions affecting the Officer Group must be reviewed and approved by the Committee. Additional details regarding the role and responsibilities of the Committee are defined in the Committee Charter, located within the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website. In December 2011, the Committee added a new member, Richard T. Clark.

The Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing CD&A with management. Based on our review and discussions with management, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.2011.

The Compensation Committee:

William D. Smithburg, Chairman

John Seely Brown

Richard T. Clark

Gordon Gund

James J. O’ConnorDeborah D. Rieman

 

4240


Executive Compensation

The following tables and charts show, for 2010,2011, the compensation paid by Corning to the Named Executive Officers. BasedCompensation for six executives is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table this year, instead of compensation paid to the required five executives. Compensation to Dr. Evenson, a newly hired Senior Vice President, exceeds the compensation to select Executive Vice Presidents because of fixed cash retention and sign on the historical fair valuepayments to Dr. Evenson negotiated as part of equity awards grantedhis new hire package designed to Named Executive Officers and the base salary of the Named Executive Officers, “Salary” accounted for approximately 13% to 18% of the total direct target compensation of the Named Executive Officers while incentive compensation accounted for approximately 82% to 87% of the total direct target compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

Mr. Volanakis, our President and Chief Operating Officer, retired from the Company on January 1, 2011.replace amounts forfeited when he left his previous employer. As a result Mr. Volanakis forfeited 3,638 stock options granted on February 1, 2010of fixed payments under his new hire package, Dr. Evenson’s compensation is not as variable and is not as representative of Corning’s annual ongoing executive compensation program for Named Executive Officers. We determined that the Corporate Performance Plan and 255,102 sharesbest approach was to expand the group of restricted stock granted pursuantexecutives to a special retention award on March 12, 2008. The grant date fair value of these stock options (2010) and shares of restricted stock (2008) are includedachieve more consistency in the tables below, because they were forfeited after December 31, 2010. Mr. Weeks was elected President, upon Mr. Volanakis’ resignation as President.composition of our NEOs.

Summary Compensation Table

 

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)(1)  (f)(2)  (g)(3)  (h)(4)  (i)(5)  (j) 

Named Executive

Officer

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change in
Pension Value
And
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 

Wendell P. Weeks

  2010   $1,069,423   $0   $0   $1,130,269   $6,724,681   $2,012,201   $429,114   $11,365,689  

Chairman and Chief

Executive Officer

  2009    1,030,000    0    1,572,615    3,007,447    1,824,748    1,233,110    382,471    9,050,391  
  2008    1,030,000    0    3,060,510    2,752,745    301,584    3,072,230    397,905    10,614,974  

Peter F. Volanakis

  2010    901,654    1,000,000    0    755,439    4,604,812    1,224,689    242,226    8,728,820  

President and Chief

Operating Officer

  2009    868,000    0    1,046,925    2,008,831    1,316,409    1,072,068    137,350    6,449,583  
  2008    868,000    0    8,037,450    1,838,285    221,600    2,760,512    209,027    13,934,874  

James B. Flaws

  2010    852,731    0    0    530,539    3,532,329    1,126,535    238,876    6,281,010  

Vice Chairman and

Chief Financial Officer

  2009    821,000    0    730,620    1,402,059    1,175,344    498,364    155,931    4,783,318  
  2008    821,000    0    4,430,550    1,286,648    199,339    3,007,546    198,747    9,943,830  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  2010    633,558    0    0    432,500    2,725,733    346,651    137,037    4,275,479  

Executive Vice President

  2009    610,000    0    605,880    1,155,407    821,426    276,988    95,154    3,564,855  

and Chief Technology

Officer

  2008    610,000    0    4,170,450    1,063,092    140,483    569,997    91,277    6,645,299  

Kirk P. Gregg

  2010    600,115    0    0    374,839    2,447,897    983,105    161,458    4,567,415  

Executive Vice President

  2009    578,000    0    525,690    1,397,465    778,335    772,150    125,373    4,177,012  

and Chief Administrative

Officer

  2008    578,000    0    1,023,060    1,241,320    133,113    1,466,114    113,782    4,555,389  
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)(1)  (f)(2)  (g)(3)  (h)(4)  (i)(5)  (j) 
     Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  

Change in

Pension Value

And

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

  All Other
Compensation
  Total 
Named Executive Officer Year  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 

Wendell P. Weeks

  2011   $1,167,154   $0   $1,749,994   $1,707,225   $2,323,076   $2,913,618   $472,465   $10,333,531  

Chairman, Chief

  2010    1,069,423    0    0    1,130,269    6,724,681    2,012,201    429,114    11,365,689  

Executive Officer

  2009    1,030,000    0    1,572,615    3,007,447    1,824,748    1,233,110    382,471    9,050,391  

James B. Flaws

  2011    880,923    0    799,993    780,440    1,083,921    928,884    250,896    4,725,056  

Vice Chairman and

  2010    852,731    0    0    530,539    3,532,329    1,126,535    238,876    6,281,010  

Chief Financial Officer

  2009    821,000    0    730,620    1,402,059    1,175,344    498,364    155,931    4,783,318  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  2011    654,212    0    599,995    585,339    802,203    317,553    155,893    3,115,195  

Executive Vice President and

  2010    633,558    0    0    432,500    2,725,733    346,651    137,037    4,275,479  

Chief Technology Officer

  2009    610,000    0    605,880    1,155,407    821,426    276,988    95,154    3,564,855  

Kirk P. Gregg

  2011    620,231    0    499,995    487,775    677,936    992,443    168,805    3,447,184  

Executive Vice President and

  2010    600,115    0    0    374,839    2,447,897    983,105    161,458    4,567,415  

Chief Administrative Officer

  2009    578,000    0    525,690    1,397,465    778,335    772,150    125,373    4,177,012  

Lawrence D. McRae

  2011    598,269    0    437,494    426,816    597,180    1,619,219    70,530    3,749,508  

Executive Vice President,

         

Strategy and Development

         

Jeffrey W. Evenson

  2011    220,673    1,600,000(6)    162,503    154,986    221,590    27,254    482,535    2,869,541  

Senior Vice President and

         

Operations Chief of Staff

         

 

(1)

The amounts in column (e) reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards of restricted stock units (2009) and performance shares (2008)(2011) granted pursuant to the Corning Corporate Performance Plan. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 19 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2011.13, 2012. This same method was used for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008.2009. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized. The following table reflects the grant date fair valueAs described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, beginning in 2011, Corning changed its practice of approving long-term incentive awards of performance shares made in December 2008to approving such awards in January, so that all long-term equity incentives are awarded in the performance year. As a result of this change, time-based restricted stock units for the 2009 performance year, computed2011 were awarded in accordance with FASB ACS Topic 718, assuming the minimum, target and maximum level of performance conditionsJanuary 2011, resulting in 2009 based on the original grant date fair values of the awards.a zero value for such awards in 2010.

   December 2008 Grant for 2009
Performance Year
 

Named Executive Officer

  Target
       (100%)      
   Maximum
       (150%)      
 

Wendell P. Weeks

  $3,060,510    $4,590,765  

Peter F. Volanakis

   2,037,450     3,056,175  

James B. Flaws

   1,430,550     2,145,825  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   1,170,450     1,755,675  

Kirk P. Gregg

   1,023,060     1,534,590  

As described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, beginning in 2011, Corning changed its practice of approving long-term incentive awards in December to approving such awards in January, so that all long-term equity incentives are awarded in the performance year. As a result of this change, time-based restricted stock units for 2011 were awarded in January 2011, resulting in a zero value for such awards in 2010.

43


(2)

The amounts in column (f) reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of stock option awards granted pursuant to the Corning Corporate Performance Plan. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 19 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2011.13, 2012. This same method was used for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008.2009. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized.

41


(3)

All of the annual cash bonuses paid to the Named Executive Officers are performance-based. Cash bonuses are paid annually through two plans: (i) GoalSharing; and (ii) the Performance Incentive Plan. Awards earned under the 20102011 GoalSharing plan were 7.72%5.05% of each Named Executive Officer’s year-end base salary and were paid in February 2011.2012. Awards earned under the 20102011 Performance Incentive Plan were based on actual corporate performance compared to the Adjusted NPAT goals established for the plans in February 2010.2011. Based on actual performance, each of the Named Executive Officers earned Performance Incentive Plan awards equal to 200%10% of their annual target bonus opportunities (established as a percentage of annual base salary). Cash awards earned under the Performance Incentive Plan for 20102011 will be paid in March 2011.2012. The following table indicates awards earned under the GoalSharing Plan and the Performance Incentive Plan reflected in column (g) above:

 

Named Executive
Officer

  Base
Salary
   2010 PIP
Target %
 Actual
2010 PIP
Performance
Results %
 2010 PIP
$ Award
   Actual
2010
GoalSharing
Performance %
 2010
GoalSharing
$ Award
  Base
Salary
 2011 PIP
Target %
 

Actual

2011 PIP

Performance

Results (% Tgt.)

 2011 PIP
$ Award
 

Actual

2011

GoalSharing

Performance %

 

2011

GoalSharing

$ Award

 

Wendell P. Weeks

  $1,071,000     100  200 $2,142,000     7.72 $82,681   $1,171,000    140  10 $163,940    5.05 $59,136  

Peter F. Volanakis

   903,000     85  200  1,535,100     7.72  69,712  

James B. Flaws

   854,000     80  200  1,366,400     7.72  65,929    882,000    90  10  79,380    5.05  44,541  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   634,500     75  200  951,750     7.72  48,983    655,000    75  10  49,125    5.05  33,078  

Kirk P. Gregg

   601,000     75  200  901,500     7.72  46,397    621,000    75  10  46,575    5.05  31,361  

Lawrence D. McRae

  599,000    70  10  41,930    5.05  30,250  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

  425,000    65  10  14,964(a)    5.05  11,626(a)  

 

 (a)

Prorated for time worked during 2011.

Awards under the 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan were based on actual corporate performance compared to the Adjusted EPS and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow goals established for the plans in February 2010.2011. Based on actual performance, each of the Named Executive Officers earned cash performance units under the Corporate Performance Plan equal to 150%60% of their annual target bonus opportunities (established as a percentage of annual base salary). Once earned, these cash performance units are subject to an additional 2-year vesting period and will be paid in February 2013.2014. The following table reflects the target amount of cash performance units and the awards earned under the 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan reflected in column (g) above:

 

Named Executive Officer

  2010 CPP
Target %
  2010 CPP
$ Target  Award
   Actual
2010 CPP
Performance
Results %
  2010 CPP
$ Award
 

Wendell P. Weeks

   100 $3,000,000     150 $4,500,000  

Peter F. Volanakis

   100  2,000,000     150  3,000,000  

James B. Flaws

   100  1,400,000     150  2,100,000  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   100  1,150,000     150  1,725,000  

Kirk P. Gregg

   100  1,000,000     150  1,500,000  

In the 2009 Summary Compensation Table, amounts awarded under the 2010 Corporate Performance Plan, but not earned, were mistakenly included in column (g) and column (j). In the Summary Compensation Table above, those amounts have been excluded from the 2009 numbers, and the earned amounts are included in columns (g) and (j) for 2010.
Named Executive Officer 2011 CPP
      $ Target Award      
   

Actual 2011 CPP

Performance

        Results %        

  2011 CPP
        $ Award        
 

Wendell P. Weeks

 $3,500,000     60 $2,100,000  

James B. Flaws

  1,600,000     60  960,000  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  1,200,000     60  720,000  

Kirk P. Gregg

  1,000,000     60  600,000  

Lawrence D. McRae

  875,000     60  525,000  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

  325,000     60  195,000  

 

(4)

The amounts in column (h) reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of the Named Executive Officer’s benefits under all pension plans established by the Company determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. Column (h) also includes amounts which the Named Executive Officer may not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. Although column (h) is also used to report the amount of above market earnings on compensation that is deferred under the nonqualified deferred compensation plans, Corning does not have any above market earnings under its nonqualified deferred compensation plan, also referred to as the Supplemental Investment Plan. The significant increase in many of the pension present values in 2011 was due primarily to a significant decrease in the actual discount rate used to value these amounts during 2011.

 

4442


(5)

The following table shows “All Other Compensation” amounts provided to the Named Executive Officers. Personal aircraft rights and home security are the only eligible services offered to the Named Executive Officers under the Executive Allowance Program. The value of the personal aircraft rights in the table below was calculated using the incremental cost of providing such perquisites and is calculated based on the average variable operating costs to the Company. Hourly rates are developed using variable operating costs that include fuel costs, mileage, maintenance, crew travel expenses, catering and other miscellaneous variable costs. The fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilot salaries, hanger expense and general taxes and insurance are excluded.

 

Named Executive Officer

  Year   Company Match
on Qualified
401(k) Plan
   Company Match
on Supplemental
Investment Plan
   Value of
Personal
Aircraft Rights
(i)
   Other
Perquisites
(i),(ii)
 Total   Year   

Company Match

on Qualified

401(k) Plan

   

Company Match

on Supplemental

Investment Plan

   

Value of

Personal

Aircraft
Rights (i)

   

Value of

Security

Costs (iii)

   Relocation   Other
Perquisites (ii)
   TOTALS 

Wendell P. Weeks

   2010    $9,057    $169,658    $85,241    $165,158(iii)  $429,114     2011    $9,057    $200,390    $81,550    $172,946(iv)     $0    $8,523    $472,465  
   2009     9,057     73,168     65,022     235,224(iv)   382,471  
   2008     6,381     183,730     51,711     156,083    397,905  

Peter F. Volanakis

   2010     3,396     133,569     64,339     40,922    242,226  
   2009     3,396     63,887     60,445     9,622    137,350     2010     9,057     169,658     85,241     159,843(iv)     0     5,315     429,114  
   2008     11,508     130,674     54,469     12,376    209,027     2009     9,057     73,168     65,022     232,239(iv)     0     2,985     382,471  

James B. Flaws

   2010     13,585     111,649     77,657     35,985    238,876     2011     13,585     129,258     78,272     23,759     0     6,022     250,896  
   2009     13,585     49,421     81,140     11,785    155,931     2010     13,585     111,649     77,657     30,670     0     5,315     238,876  
   2008     12,659     119,373     54,489     12,226    198,747     2009     13,585     49,421     81,140     4,184     0     7,601     155,931  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   2010     8,800     20,499     74,174     33,564    137,037     2011     8,800     57,398     63,246     23,759     0     2,691     155,893  
   2009     8,800     21,220     53,001     12,133    95,154     2010     8,800     20,499     74,174     30,670     0     2,894     137,037  
   2008     8,200     19,708     51,497     11,872    91,277     2009     8,800     21,220     53,001     4,184     0     7,949     95,154  

Kirk P. Gregg

   2010     9,778     45,360     75,335     30,985    161,458     2011     9,778     52,947     81,960     23,759     0     361     168,805  
   2009     9,778     18,667     89,405     7,523    125,373     2010     9,778     45,360     75,335     30,670     0     315     161,458  
   2008     6,889     51,135     51,031     4,727    113,782     2009     9,778     18,667     89,405     4,184     0     3,339     125,373  

Lawrence D. McRae

   2011     15,129     0     31,281     23,759     0     361     70,530  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

   2011     8,827     0     23,768     13,291     436,289(v)     361     482,535  

 

 (i)

The “Executive Allowance Program” is tracked on a December 1 to November 30 year.

 (ii)The

These amounts include:

cost attributable to home security;

Ÿ

cost attributable to executive physicals;

cost attributable to service awards; and

contributions to charities made under the Corning Foundation Matching Gift Program.

Ÿ

cost attributable to service awards; and

Ÿ

contributions to charities made under the Corning Foundation Matching Gift Program.

 (iii)

These amounts include costs attributable to home security.

(iv)

This amount includes $149,296 ofreflects company-paid expenses relating to personal and residential security benefitting Mr. Weeks and his family members in 2010 under a Board-authorized security program.members. Mr. Weeks’ personal safety and security are of vital importance to the company’s business and prospects. These costs are appropriate corporate business expenses. However, because these costs can be viewed as conveying some personal benefitsbenefit to Mr. Weeks, they are reported as perquisites in this column.

(v)

Includes payments made to Dr. Evenson, as part of his offer to join Corning, to facilitate the sale of his prior home and to relocate to Corning, NY.

 

(6)(iv)This amount includes $232,239

As part of company-paid expenses relatinghis offer to personaljoin Corning, Dr. Evenson was paid a cash sign on and residential security benefitting Mr. Weeks and his family membersretention payment of $1.6 million in 2009 under a Board-authorized security program.2011.

 

4543


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

     Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
                     Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
                

(a)

 (b) (c) (d)(1) (e)(1) (f)(1) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n)  (b) (c) (d)(1) (e)(1) (f)(1) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) 

Named Executive
Officer

 Grant
Date
 Date of
Committee
Action
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maxi-
mum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maxi-
mum
(#)
 All
Other
Stock

Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or
Units
(#)
 All  Other
Option

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 Closing
Market
Price on
Date of
Grant
 Grant
Date Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
  Award Grant
Date
 Date of
Committee
Action
 Threshold
($)
 

Target

($)

 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 Closing
Market
Price on
Date of
Grant
 Grant
Date Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
 
 

Wendell P. Weeks

  n/a    $0   $1,071,000   $2,142,000           Performance Incentive Plan  n/a     $0    $1,639,400    $3,278,800           
  n/a     0    53,550    107,100          
  12/02/09    12/02/09    0    3,000,000(2)   4,500,000(3)         
  01/04/10    12/02/09           65,333   $19.56   $19.56   $586,037  
  02/01/10    12/02/09           65,334    18.16    18.16    544,232  
               
              1,130,269(4) 
               

Peter F. Volanakis

  n/a     0    767,550    1,535,100          
  n/a     0    45,150    90,300           GoalSharing Plan  n/a     0    58,550    117,100           
  12/02/09    12/02/09    0    2,000,000(2)   3,000,000(3)          Cash Performance Units  1/3/11    1/3/11    0    3,500,000(2)    5,250,000(3)           
  01/04/10    12/02/09           43,667    19.56    19.56    391,693   Time-Based Restricted Stock Units  1/3/11    1/3/11          91,193      $19.19    1,749,994(4)  
  02/01/10    12/02/09           43,667    18.16    18.16    363,746   Stock Options  1/3/11    1/3/11           67,551    $19.19    19.19    $569,077  
                Stock Options  2/1/11    1/3/11           57,131    22.69    22.69    569,077  
              755,439(4)  Stock Options  3/1/11    1/3/11           58,842    22.03    22.03    569,071  
                

James B. Flaws

  n/a     0    683,200    1,366,400           Performance Incentive Plan  n/a     0    793,800    1,587,600           
  n/a     0    42,700    85,400           GoalSharing Plan  n/a     0    44,100    88,200           
  12/02/09    12/02/09    0    1,400,000(2)   2,100,000(3)          Cash Performance Units  1/3/11    1/3/11    0    1,600,000(2)    2,400,000(3)           
  01/04/10    12/02/09           30,667    19.56    19.56    275,083   Time-Based Restricted Stock Units  1/3/11    1/3/11          41,688      19.19    799,993(4)  
  02/01/10    12/02/09           30,667    18.16    18.16    255,456   Stock Options  1/3/11    1/3/11           30,880    19.19    19.19    260,146  
                Stock Options  2/1/11    1/3/11           26,117    22.69    22.69    260,149  
              530,539(4)  Stock Options  3/1/11    1/3/11           26,899    22.03    22.03    260,145  
                

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  n/a     0    475,875    951,750           Performance Incentive Plan  n/a     0    491,250    982,500           
  n/a     0    31,725    63,450           GoalSharing Plan  n/a     0    32,750    65,500           
  12/02/09    12/02/09    0    1,150,000(2)   1,725,000(3)          Cash Performance Units  1/3/11    1/3/11    0    1,200,000(2)    1,800,000(3)           
  01/04/10    12/02/09           25,000    19.56    19.56    224,250   Time-Based Restricted Stock Units  1/3/11    1/3/11          31,266      19.19    599,995(4)  
  02/01/10    12/02/09           25,000    18.16    18.16    208,250   Stock Options  1/3/11    1/3/11           23,160    19.19    19.19    195,109  
                Stock Options  2/1/11    1/3/11           19,588    22.69    22.69    195,114  
              432,500(4)  Stock Options  3/1/11    1/3/11           20,175    22.03    22.03    195,116  
                

Kirk P. Gregg

  n/a     0    450,750    901,500           Performance Incentive Plan  n/a     0    465,750    931,500           
  n/a     0    30,050    60,100           GoalSharing Plan  n/a     0    31,050    62,100           
  12/02/09    12/02/09    0    1,000,000(2)   1,500,000(3)          Cash Performance Units  1/3/11    1/3/11    0    1,000,000(2)    1,500,000(3)           
  01/04/10    12/02/09           21,667    19.56    19.56    194,353   Time-Based Restricted Stock Units  1/3/11    1/3/11          26,055      19.19    499,995(4)  
  02/01/10    12/02/09           21,667    18.16    18.16    180,486   Stock Options  1/3/11    1/3/11           19,300    19.19    19.19    162,591  
                Stock Options  2/1/11    1/3/11           16,323    22.69    22.69    162,592  
              374,839(4)  

Stock Options

 

  3/1/11    1/3/11                  16,812    22.03    22.03    162,592  
               

44


              Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
                    
(a)   (b)  (c)  (d)(1)  (e)(1)  (f)(1)  (g) (h) (i) (j)  (k)  (l)  (m)  (n) 
Named Executive
Officer
 Award Grant
Date
  Date of
Committee
Action
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Closing
Market
Price on
Date of
Grant
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
 
  

Lawrence D. McRae

 Performance Incentive Plan  n/a     0    419,300    838,600           
  GoalSharing Plan  n/a     0    29,950    59,900           
  Cash Performance Units  1/3/11    1/3/11    0    875,000(2)    1,312,500(3)           
  Time-Based Restricted Stock Units  1/3/11    1/3/11          22,798      19.19    437,494(4)  
  Stock Options  1/3/11    1/3/11           16,888    19.19    19.19    142,271  
  Stock Options  2/1/11    1/3/11           14,283    22.69    22.69    142,272  
  Stock Options  3/1/11    1/3/11           14,711    22.03    22.03    142,273  
  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

 Performance Incentive
Plan (5)
  n/a     0    149,635    299,271           
  GoalSharing Plan(5)  n/a     0    11,510    23,021           
  Cash Performance Units(5)  7/1/11    3/8/11    0    325,000(2)    487,500(3)           
  Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(5)  7/1/11    3/8/11          8,765      18.54    162,503(4)  
  

Stock Options(5)

 

  7/1/11    3/8/11                          19,477    18.54    18.54    154,986  

 

(1)

The amounts shown in columns (d), (e) and (f) reflect the payment levels under (i) the Company’s 20102011 Performance Incentive Plan (ii) 20102011 GoalSharing Plan and (iii) the cash units under the 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan. Opportunities under these plans are cash payments. If the threshold level of performance is not met then payout will be 0%. If the target amount of performance is met for GoalSharing and PIP, then payout is 100% of the target award. If the maximum level of performance is met then payout is 200% of the target award. These amounts are based on the individual’s 20102011 base salary and bonus targets.

(2)

This amount reflects target amount of cash performance units that were approved for such Named Executive Officer on December 2, 2009January 3, 2011 under the 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan. Actual awards granted for these cash units may range from 0% to 150% of the target award. For Dr. Evenson, this amount reflects target amount of cash performance units that were approved for on July 1, 2011 under the 2011 Corporate Performance Plan.

(3)

This amount reflects maximum (150% of target) amount of cash performance units that were approved for such Named Executive Officer on December 2, 2009January 3, 2011 under the 20102011 Corporate Performance Plan. Actual awards granted for these cash units may range from 0% to 150% of the target award. For Dr. Evenson, this amount reflects maximum (150% of target) amount of cash performance units that were approved for on July 1, 2011 under the 2011 Corporate Performance Plan.

(4)

This amount reflects the total grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of stock option awards granted in calendar year 20102011 pursuant to the Corning 20102011 Corporate Performance Plans, and corresponds to the amount set forth in column (f) for 20102011 of the Summary Compensation Table.

(5)

Pro-rated for time worked in 2011.

 

4645


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and unexercisable as of December 31, 2010.2011. The table also shows unvested restricted stock awards assuming a market value of $19.32$12.98 a share (the NYSE closing price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2010)30, 2011).

 

Option AwardsOption Awards  Stock Awards 
(a)     (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)(2) (h)(3) (i) (j)    (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)(2) (h)(3) (i) (j) 

Named Executive
Officer

 Grant
Date
 Vesting
Schedule
Code(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
  Grant
Date
 

Vesting

Code(1)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

9#)

(#)

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
 

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested

($)

 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

Wendell P. Weeks

  04/28/05    G    130,000    0    0   $13.68    04/27/15    613,680(2)  $11,856,298    0   $0    04/28/05   E  130,000    0    0   $13.68    4/27/2015    684,233   $8,881,344    0   $0  
  12/07/05    B    161,500    0    0    21.08    12/06/15        12/07/05   B  161,500    0    0   $21.08    12/6/2015       
  01/02/06    C    80,750    0    0    19.68    01/01/16        01/02/06   C  80,750    0    0   $19.68    1/1/2016       
  02/01/06    D    80,750    0    0    24.72    01/31/16        02/01/06   D  80,750    0    0   $24.72    1/31/2016       
  12/06/06    B    136,500    0    0    21.89    12/05/16        12/06/06   B  136,500    0    0   $21.89    12/5/2016       
  01/02/07    C    68,250    0    0    18.85    01/01/17        01/02/07   C  68,250    0    0   $18.85    1/1/2017       
  02/01/07    D    68,250    0    0    20.86    01/31/17        02/01/07   D  68,250    0    0   $20.86    1/31/2017       
  12/05/07    B    153,500    0    0    24.92    12/04/17        12/05/07   B  153,500    0    0   $24.92    12/4/2017       
  01/02/08    C    76,750    0    0    23.37    01/01/18        01/02/08   C  76,750    0    0   $23.37    1/1/2018       
  02/01/08    D    0    76,750    0    24.61    01/31/18        02/01/08   D  76,750    0    0   $24.61    1/31/2018       
  12/03/08    G    93,333    93,334    0    8.67    12/02/18        12/03/08   E  93,334    0    0    $8.67    12/2/2018       
  01/02/09    G    93,333    186,667    0    10.05    01/01/19        01/02/09   E  86,666    93,334    0   $10.05    1/1/2019       
  02/02/09    G    93,333    186,667    0    10.25    02/01/19        02/02/09   E  186,666    93,334    0   $10.25    2/1/2019       
  12/02/09    G    21,777    43,556    0    17.82    12/02/19        12/02/09   E  43,555    21,778    0   $17.82    12/2/2019       
  01/04/10    G    0    65,333    0    19.56    01/04/20        01/04/10   E  21,777    43,556    0   $19.56    1/4/2020       
  02/01/10    G    0    65,334    0    18.16    02/01/20        02/01/10   E  21,778    43,556    0   $18.16    2/1/2020       
  Total     1,258,026    717,641           01/03/11   E  0    67,551    0   $19.19    1/3/2021       
  02/01/11   E  0    57,131    0   $22.69    2/1/2021       

Peter F. Volanakis

  02/02/04    D    52,500    0    0    12.79    02/01/14    663,662(2)   12,821,950    0    0  
  03/01/11   E  0    58,842    0   $22.03    3/1/2021       
  Total     1,486,776    479,082          
 

James B. Flaws

  12/07/05   B  77,000    0    0   $21.08    12/6/2015    317,453   $4,120,540    0   $0  
  12/01/04    B    115,000    0    0    12.70    11/30/14        01/02/06   C  38,500    0    0   $19.68    1/1/2016       
  01/03/05    C    57,500    0    0    11.84    01/02/15        02/01/06   D  38,500    0    0   $24.72    1/31/2016       
  04/28/05    G    125,000    0    0    13.68    04/27/15        12/06/06   B  66,000    0    0   $21.89    12/5/2016       
  12/07/05    B    111,000    0    0    21.08    12/06/15        01/02/07   C  33,000    0    0   $18.85    1/1/2017       
  01/02/06    C    55,500    0    0    19.68    01/01/16        02/01/07   D  33,000    0    0   $20.86    1/31/2017       
  02/01/06    D    55,500    0    0    24.72    01/31/16        02/13/07   A  18,932    0    0   $21.92    2/2/2013       
  12/06/06    B    96,000    0    0    21.89    12/05/16        04/30/07   A  23,327    0    0   $23.72    2/2/2013       
  01/02/07    C    48,000    0    0    18.85    01/01/17        12/05/07   B  72,000    0    0   $24.92    12/4/2017       
  02/01/07    D    48,000    0    0    20.86    01/31/17        01/02/08   C  36,000    0    0   $23.37    1/1/2018       
  12/05/07    B    102,500    0    0    24.92    12/04/17        02/01/08   D  36,000    0    0   $24.61    1/31/2018       
  01/02/08    C    51,250    0    0    23.37    01/01/18        12/03/08   E  43,445    0    0    $8.67    12/2/2018       
  02/01/08    D    0    51,250    0    24.61    01/31/18        01/02/09   E  0    43,445    0   $10.05    1/1/2019       
  12/03/08    G    62,333    62,334    0    8.67    12/02/18        02/02/09   E  0    43,445    0   $10.25    2/1/2019       
  01/02/09    G    62,333    124,667    0    10.05    01/01/19        12/02/09   E  20,444    10,222    0   $17.82    12/2/2019       
  02/02/09    G    62,333    124,667    0    10.25    02/01/19        01/04/10   E  10,222    20,445    0   $19.56    1/4/2020       
  12/02/09    G    14,555    29,111    0    17.82    12/02/19        02/01/10   E  10,222    20,445    0   $18.16    2/1/2020       
  01/04/10    G    0    43,667    0    19.56    01/04/20        01/03/11   E  0    30,880    0   $19.19    1/3/2021       
  02/01/10    G    0    43,667    0    18.16    02/01/20        02/01/11   E  0    26,117    0   $22.69    2/1/2021       
  Total     1,119,304    479,363           03/01/11   E  0    26,899    0   $22.03    3/1/2021       
  Total    556,592    221,898    

46


Option Awards  Stock Awards 
(a)      (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)(2)  (h)(3)  (i)  (j) 
Named Executive Officer Grant
Date
  

Vesting

Code(1)

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested

($)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  12/07/05   B  58,500    0    0   $21.08    12/6/2015    299,779   $3,891,131    0   $0  
   01/02/06   C  29,250    0    0   $19.68    1/1/2016       
   02/01/06   D  29,250    0    0   $24.72    1/31/2016       
   12/06/06   B  55,500    0    0   $21.89    12/5/2016       
   02/01/07   D  27,750    0    0   $20.86    1/31/2017       
   12/05/07   B  59,500    0    0   $24.92    12/4/2017       
   01/02/08   C  29,750    0    0   $23.37    1/1/2018       
   02/01/08   D  29,750    0    0   $24.61    1/31/2018       
   12/03/08   E  35,889    0    0    $8.67    12/2/2018       
   01/02/09   E  0    35,889    0   $10.05    1/1/2019       
   02/02/09   E  0    35,889    0   $10.25    2/1/2019       
   12/02/09   E  16,666    8,334    0   $17.82    12/2/2019       
   01/04/10   E  8,333    16,667    0   $19.56    1/4/2020       
   02/01/10   E  8,333    16,667    0   $18.16    2/1/2020       
   01/03/11   E  0    23,160    0   $19.19    1/3/2021       
   02/01/11   E  0    19,588    0   $22.69    2/1/2021       
   03/01/11   E  0    20,175    0   $22.03    3/1/2021       
   Total     388,471    176,369          
  

Kirk P. Gregg

  02/02/04   D  39,500    0    0   $12.79    2/1/2014    224,295   $2,911,349    0   $0  
   05/10/05   A  15,369    0    0   $14.84    1/2/2013       
   12/07/05   B  58,500    0    0   $21.08    12/6/2015       
   01/02/06   C  29,250    0    0   $19.68    1/1/2016       
   02/01/06   D  29,250    0    0   $24.72    1/31/2016       
   08/07/06   A  20,396    0    0   $18.32    1/2/2013       
   10/27/06   A  14,520    0    0   $20.59    12/3/2012       
   11/03/06   A  16,495    0    0   $20.51    12/3/2012       
   12/06/06   B  48,000    0    0   $21.89    12/5/2016       
   01/02/07   C  24,000    0    0   $18.85    1/1/2017       
   02/01/07   D  24,000    0    0   $20.86    1/31/2017       
   02/12/07   A  19,212    0    0   $21.60    2/2/2013       
   08/03/07   A  10,284    0    0   $23.54    2/2/2013       
   08/03/07   A  13,152    0    0   $23.54    1/31/2012       
   10/29/07   A  28,467    0    0   $23.79    1/31/2012       
   12/05/07   B  51,000    0    0   $24.92    12/4/2017       
   01/02/08   C  25,500    0    0   $23.37    1/1/2018       
   02/01/08   D  25,500    0    0   $24.61    1/31/2018       
   02/12/08   A  9,338    0    0   $23.31    1/31/2012       
   02/12/08   A  14,568    0    0   $23.31    1/31/2012       
   05/01/08   A  5,428    0    0   $27.03    1/31/2012       
   12/03/08   E  62,000    0    0    $8.67    12/2/2018       
   01/02/09   E  31,000    31,000    0   $10.05    1/1/2019       
   02/02/09   E  31,000    31,000    0   $10.25    2/1/2019       
   12/02/09   E  14,444    7,222    0   $17.82    12/2/2019       
   01/04/10   E  7,222    14,445    0   $19.56    1/4/2020       
   02/01/10   E  7,222    14,445    0   $18.16    2/1/2020       
   01/03/11   E  0    19,300    0   $19.19    1/3/2021       
   02/01/11   E  0    16,323    0   $22.69    2/1/2021       
   03/01/11   E  0    16,812    0   $22.03    3/1/2021       
   Total      674,617    150,547                              

 

47


(a)       (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)(2)  (h)(3)  (i)  (j) 

Named Executive
Officer

 Grant
Date
  Vesting
Schedule
Code(1)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

James B. Flaws

  12/07/05    B    77,000    0    0   $21.08    12/06/15    329,067(2)  $6,357,574    0   $0  
  01/02/06    C    38,500    0    0    19.68   ��01/01/16      
  02/01/06    D    38,500    0    0    24.72    01/31/16      
  12/06/06    B    66,000    0    0    21.89    12/05/16      
  01/02/07    C    33,000    0    0    18.85    01/01/17      
  02/01/07    D    33,000    0    0    20.86    01/31/17      
  02/13/07    A    18,932    0    0    21.92    02/02/13      
  04/30/07    A    23,327    0    0    23.72    02/02/13      
  12/05/07    B    72,000    0    0    24.92    12/04/17      
  01/02/08    C    36,000    0    0    23.37    01/01/18      
  02/01/08    D    0    36,000    0    24.61    01/31/18      
  12/03/08    G    43,444    43,445    0    8.67    12/02/18      
  01/02/09    G    0    86,889    0    10.05    01/01/19      
  02/02/09    G    0    86,890    0    10.25    02/01/19      
  12/02/09    G    10,222    20,444    0    17.82    12/02/19      
  01/04/10    G    0    30,667    0    19.56    01/04/20      
  02/01/10    G    0    30,667    0    18.16    02/01/20      
  Total     489,925    335,002         

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  07/31/01    G    100,000    0    0    15.87    07/30/11    319,924(2)   6,180,932    0    0  
  12/07/05    B    58,500    0    0    21.08    12/06/15      
  01/02/06    C    29,250    0    0    19.68    01/01/16      
  02/01/06    D    29,250    0    0    24.72    01/31/16      
  12/06/06    B    55,500    0    0    21.89    12/05/16      
  01/02/07    C    27,750    0    0    18.85    01/01/17      
  02/01/07    D    27,750    0    0    20.86    01/31/17      
  12/05/07    B    59,500    0    0    24.92    12/04/17      
  01/02/08    C    29,750    0    0    23.37    01/01/18      
  02/01/08    D    0    29,750    0    24.61    01/31/18      
  12/03/08    G    35,889    35,889    0    8.67    12/02/18      
  01/02/09    G    0    71,778    0    10.05    01/01/19      
  02/02/09    G    0    71,778    0    10.25    02/01/19      
  12/02/09    G    8,333    16,667    0    17.82    12/02/19      
  01/04/10    G    0    25,000    0    19.56    01/04/20      
  02/01/10    G    0    25,000    0    18.16    02/01/20      
  Total     461,472    275,862         

Option Awards  Stock Awards 
(a)      (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)(2)  (h)(3)  (i)  (j) 
Named Executive Officer Grant
Date
  

Vesting 

Code(1)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable

(#)

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested

($)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

Lawrence D. McRae

  12/07/05   B  22,500    0    0   $21.08    12/6/2015    136,248   $1,768,499    0   $0  
   01/02/06   C  11,250    0    0   $19.68    1/1/2016       
   02/01/06   D  11,250    0    0   $24.72    1/31/2016       
   12/06/06   B  21,000    0    0   $21.89    12/5/2016       
   01/02/07   C  10,500    0    0   $18.85    1/1/2017       
   02/01/07   D  10,500    0    0   $20.86    1/31/2017       
   12/05/07   B  25,000    0    0   $24.92    12/4/2017       
   01/02/08   C  12,500    0    0   $23.37    1/1/2018       
   02/01/08   D  12,500    0    0   $24.61    1/31/2018       
   12/03/08   E  17,000    0    0    $8.67    12/2/2018       
   01/02/09   E  0    17,000    0   $10.05    1/1/2019       
   02/02/09   E  17,000    17,000    0   $10.25    2/1/2019       
   12/02/09   E  10,222    5,111    0   $17.82    12/2/2019       
   01/04/10   E  5,111    10,222    0   $19.56    1/4/2020       
   02/01/10   E  5,111    10,223    0   $18.16    2/1/2020       
   01/03/11   E  0    16,888    0   $19.19    1/3/2021       
   02/01/11   E  0    14,283    0   $22.69    2/1/2021       
   03/01/11   E  0    14,711    0   $22.03    3/1/2021       
   Total     191,444    105,438          
  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

  07/01/11   E  0    19,477    0   $18.54    7/1/2021    8,765   $113,770    0   $0  
   Total      0    19,477                              

 

48


(a)       (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)(2)  (h)(3)  (i)  (j) 

Named Executive
Officer

 Grant
Date
  Vesting
Schedule
Code(1)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Shares
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

Kirk P. Gregg

  02/02/04    D    39,500    0    0   $12.79    02/01/14    205,120(2)  $3,962,918    0   $0  
  05/10/05    A    15,369    0    0    14.84    01/02/13      
  12/07/05    B    58,500    0    0    21.08    12/06/15      
  01/02/06    C    29,250    0    0    19.68    01/01/16      
  02/01/06    D    29,250    0    0    24.72    01/31/16      
  08/07/06    A    20,396    0    0    18.32    01/02/13      
  10/27/06    A    14,520    0    0    20.59    12/03/12      
  11/03/06    A    16,495    0    0    20.51    12/03/12      
  12/06/06    B    48,000    0    0    21.89    12/05/16      
  01/02/07    C    24,000    0    0    18.85    01/01/17      
  02/01/07    D    24,000    0    0    20.86    01/31/17      
  02/12/07    A    19,212    0    0    21.60    02/02/13      
  08/03/07    A    10,284    0    0    23.54    02/02/13      
  08/03/07    A    13,152    0    0    23.54    01/31/12      
  10/29/07    A    28,467    0    0    23.79    01/31/12      
  12/05/07    B    51,000    0    0    24.92    12/04/17      
  01/02/08    C    25,500    0    0    23.37    01/01/18      
  02/01/08    D    0    25,500    0    24.61    01/31/18      
  02/12/08    A    9,338    0    0    23.31    01/31/12      
  02/12/08    A    14,568    0    0    23.31    01/31/12      
  05/01/08    A    5,428    0    0    27.03    01/31/12      
  05/01/08    A    18,421    0    0    27.03    12/04/11      
  12/03/08    G    31,000    31,000    0    8.67    12/02/18      
  01/02/09    G    0    62,000    0    10.05    01/01/19      
  02/02/09    G    0    62,000    0    10.25    02/01/19      
  07/29/09    A    5,959    0    0    16.78    01/31/12      
  07/29/09    A    5,962    0    0    16.78    12/04/11      
  07/29/09    A    75,544    0    0    16.78    12/04/11      
  12/02/09    G    7,222    14,444    0    17.82    12/02/19      
  01/04/10    G    0    21,667    0    19.56    01/04/20      
  02/01/10    G    0    21,667    0    18.16    02/01/20      
  Total     640,337    238,278         

 

(1)

The Company uses the following vesting codes:

 

 A

Reload Option—100% vesting 1 year after grant date. The reload feature was eliminated from all stock options granted on or after February 28, 2003, but still exists for options granted before that date.

 B

100% vesting 1 year after grant date

 C

100% vesting 2 years after grant date

 D

100% vesting 3 years after grant date

 E50% vesting February 1, 2001, 50% vesting February 2, 2002
F50% vesting 4 years after grant date, 50% vesting 5 years after grant date
G

1/3 vesting 1 year after grant date, 1/3 vesting 2 years after grant date and 1/3 vesting 3 years after grant date

H1/3 vesting 3 years after grant date, 1/3 vesting 4 years after grant date and 1/3 vesting 5 years after grant date

(2)

Amounts include:

504,790; 336,050; 235,950; 193,050; 168,740; 92,950; and 168,7400 performance share units granted to Messrs. Weeks, Volanakis, Flaws, Miller, Gregg, McRae and Gregg,Evenson respectively, on December 3, 2008 and February 3,1, 2010, which vest on February 1, 2012.

88,250; 58,750; 41,000; 34,000;39,815; 32,946; 29,500; 20,500; and 29,5000 restricted share units granted to Messrs. Weeks, Volanakis, Flaws, Miller, Gregg, McRae and Gregg,Evenson respectively, on December 2, 2009, which vest on February 15, 2013.

20,640; 13,760; 9,600; 7,840;91,193; 41,688; 31,266; 26,055; 22,798; and 6,8800 restricted shares of our common stockshare units granted to Messrs. Weeks, Volanakis, Flaws, Miller, Gregg, McRae and Gregg, respectively,Evenson on December 5, 2007,January 3, 2011, which vest on February 1, 2011.

255,102 restricted shares of our common stock granted to Mr. Volanakis on March 12, 2008, which would have vested 1/3 on each April 1 of 2011, 2012 and 2013. Mr. Volanakis retired on January 1, 2011 and forfeited these restricted shares.14, 2014.

42,517 restricted shares of our common stock granted to Mr. FlawsDr. Miller on March 12, 2008, which vest on April 1, 2011.2012.

85,0348,765 restricted shares of our common stock granted to Mr. MillerDr. Evenson on March 12, 2008,July 1, 2011, which vest 1/2 on each AprilJuly 1, of 2011 and 2012.2014.

(3)

Year-end market price is based on the December 31, 201030, 2011 NYSE closing price of $19.32.$12.98.

 

4948


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth certain information regarding options exercised and restricted stock that vested during 20102011 for the Named Executive Officers.

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards   Option Awards   Stock Awards 
(a)  (b)   (c)   (d)   (e) 

Named Executive Officer

  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
   Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
   

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise

 

(#)

 

Value
Realized on
Exercise

 

($)

   

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting

 

(#)

 

  Value Realized  
on Vesting

 

($)

 
 

Wendell P. Weeks

   733,333    $5,185,115     184,500    $3,350,520     193,333     $2,497,129     20,640     $468,322    

Peter F. Volanakis

   172,333     1,436,467     129,000     2,342,640  

James B. Flaws

   143,457     1,253,943     132,517     2,500,896     130,333      1,691,140     53,302      1,116,840    

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   193,666     1,345,610     116,017     2,201,256     235,417      2,191,231     51,411      1,074,391    

Kirk P. Gregg

   93,000     765,675     66,000     1,198,560     87,465      517,793     6,880      156,107    

Lawrence D. McRae

   34,000      451,724     13,520      306,769    

Jeffrey W. Evenson

   0      0     0      0    

There were no deferrals of amounts received pursuant to these awards.

Retirement Plans

Qualified Pension Plan

Corning sponsors a qualified defined benefit Pension Plan to provide retirement income to Corning’s U.S.-basedUS based employees. The plan pays benefits for salaried employees based upon career average plan compensation, where plan compensation is defined as base pay, annual bonus and awards that are paid (including GoalSharing awards, division cash awards, individual outstanding contributor awardsDivision Cash Awards, Individual Outstanding Contributor Awards and other cash bonuses) and years of credited service. Salaried employees are required to contribute 2% of compensation in excess of the Social Security wage base up to the compensation limit imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Salaried and nonunion hourly employees may also contribute 2% of pay up to the Social Security wage base on a voluntary basis.

Corning amended its pension plan effective July 1, 2000 to include a cash balance component. All salaried and non-union hourly employees as of July 1, 2000 were given a choice to prospectively accrue benefits under the career average earnings formula or a cash balance formula, if so elected. Employees hired subsequent to July 1, 2000 earn benefits under the cash balance formula.

Benefits earned under the career average earnings formula are equal to 1.5% of plan compensation plus 0.5% of plan compensation on which employee contributions have been made. Under the career average earnings formula, participants may retire as early as age 55 with 5 years of service. Unreduced benefits are available when a participant attains the earlier of age 60 with 5 years of service or age 55 with 30 years of service. Otherwise, benefits are reduced 4% for each year by which retirement precedes the attainment of age 60. Pension benefits earned under the career average earnings formula are distributed in the form of a lifetime annuity with six years of payments guaranteed.

Benefits earned under the cash balance formula are expressed in the form of a hypothetical account balance. Each month a participant’s cash balance account is increased by (1) pay credits based on the participant’s plan compensation for that month and (2) interest credits based on the participant’s hypothetical account balance at the end of the prior month. Pay credits vary between 3% and 8% based on the participant’s age plus service at the end of the year. Interest credits are based on 10-year Treasury bond yields, subject to a minimum credit of 3.80%. Pension benefits under the cash balance formula may be distributed as either a lump sum of the participant’s hypothetical account balance or an actuarial equivalent life annuity.

49


Mr. Weeks, Mr. Flaws and Mr. VolanakisMcRae are earning benefits under the career average earnings formula. Mr. Gregg earned benefits under the career average earnings formula up to December 31, 2000 and subsequently earned benefits under the cash balance formula. Mr.Drs. Miller isand Evenson are earning benefits under the cash balance formula. Mr. Flaws and Mr.Dr. Miller are currently eligible to retire under the plan. Mr. Volanakis retired on January 1, 2011.

 

50


Corning’s contributions to the plan are determined by the plan’s actuaries and are not determined on an individual basis. The amount of benefits payable under the plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Supplemental Pension Plan and Executive Supplemental Pension Plan

Corning also maintains nonqualified pension plans to attract and retain a highly-motivated executive workforce by providing eligible employees with retirement benefits in excess of those permitted under the qualified plan. The benefits provided under the Supplemental Pension Plan (SPP) will be approximately equal to the difference between the benefits provided under the Corning, IncorporatedInc. Pension Plan and benefits that would have been provided thereunder if not for the limitations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Certain employees, including each of the Named Executive Officers, participate in the Corning Incorporated Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (ESPP). Participants in the ESPP shall receive no benefits from the SPP. Executives fully vest in their ESPP benefit upon attainment of age fifty with ten years of service. Participants terminating prior to fully vesting in their ESPP benefit, but with five years of service will be entitled to ESPP benefits equivalent to the SPP formula. ESPP participants also maintain the right to take any benefits earned under the cash balance formula of the SPP prior to their participation in the ESPP as a lump sum payment from the ESPP.

Under the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan participants earn benefits based on the highest sixty consecutive months of average plan compensation over the last one hundred twenty months immediately preceding the date of termination of employment. Plan compensation is defined as base pay plus bonuses paid, including cash payments of GoalSharing awards, Performance Incentive Plan awards, division cash awards, individual outstanding contributor awardsDivision Cash Awards, Individual Outstanding Contributor Awards and other cash bonuses.

A change in the benefits provided under the ESPP formula was approved in December 2006. Subsequent to the change, gross benefits determined under this plan are equal to one of two benefit formulas:

Formula A: 2.0% of average plan compensation multiplied by years of service up to 25 years.

Formula B: 1.5% of average plan compensation multiplied by years of service with no cap on years of service.

Prior to the approval of the change in benefit formula in December 2006, ESPP benefits were provided under the following formula:

 

Sum of (i) 1.0% of average plan compensation up to the Social Security covered compensation limit and (ii) 1.5% of average plan compensation over Social Security covered compensation.

Ÿ

Sum of (i) 1.0% of average plan compensation up to Social Security covered and (ii) 1.5% of average plan compensation over Social Security covered compensation.

 

Multiplied by years of service through the December 31 of the year prior to termination of employment.

Ÿ

Multiplied by years of service through the December 31 of the year prior to termination of employment.

In addition, benefits earned in the year of termination of employment are based on the career average earnings formula or cash balance formula of the Corning Incorporated Pension Plan without regard to compensation limits. Under this formula average plan compensation was based on the highest five consecutive calendar years of average plan compensation over the last ten years immediately preceding the year of termination of employment.

Subsequent to the December 2006 change in formula, benefits are determined under Formula B for Mr. Flaws and Formula A for all other Named Executive Officers.NEOs.

50


Benefits earned under the Corning Incorporated Pension Plan and the cash balance formula of the SPP prior to ESPP participation will offset benefits earned under the preceding formulas.

51


Participants may retire as early as age 55 with ten years of service. Unreduced benefits under Formula A are available when a participant attains the earlier of age 60 with 10 years of service or age 55 with 25 years of service. Unreduced benefits under Formula B are available at the earlier of age 60 with 5 years of service or age 55 with 30 years of service. Otherwise, benefits from both formulas and the career average earnings formula from the SPP are reduced 4% for each year by which retirement precedes the attainment of age 60.

Occasionally, Corning needs to hire senior mid-career executives. In order to attract appropriate executive talent, Corning may grant additional years of pension service under its nonqualified plans. Corning has an agreement with Mr. Gregg to provide 9 extra years of benefit service under the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan for retirement on or after age 55, subject to the plan maximum of 25 years of service. The additional value generated by these extra years of service is approximately $2,357,000.

Benefits earned under the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan are distributed in the form of a lifetime annuity, with six years of payments guaranteed except for benefits earned under the cash balance formula of the SPP prior to becoming a participant in the ESPP which is distributed as a lump sum of the participant’s hypothetical account balance.

Under Mr. Flaws’ employmentwritten agreement, Corning will purchase a life annuity from an insurance company to pay benefits due under this plan. Mr. Flaws and Mr.Dr. Miller are currently eligible to retire under the plan. Mr. Volanakis retired on January 1, 2011.

Pension Benefits

The table below shows the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the Named Executive Officers, including the number of years of service credited to each such Named Executive Officer, under each of the qualified pension plan and the ESPP. These amounts were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements with the exception of the assumed retirement age and the assumed probabilities of leaving employment prior to retirement. Retirement was assumed to occur at the earliest possible unreduced retirement age for each plan in which the executive participates. For purposes of determining the earliest unreduced retirement age, service was assumed to be granted until the actual date of retirement. For example, an executive under the ESPP formula who is age 50 with 20 years of service would be assumed to retire at age 55 due to eligibility of unreduced benefits at 25 years of service. No termination, disability or death was assumed to occur prior to retirement. Otherwise, the assumptions used are described in Note 13 to our Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 20102011 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2011.13, 2012. Information regarding the qualified pension plan can be found under the heading “Qualified Pension Plan” on page 50.49.

 

(a)  (b)  (c)  (d)   (e)

Named Executive Officer

  Plan Name  Number of years
Credited Service
(#)
  Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)
   Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
 Plan Name 

    Number of years    

Credited Service
(#)

 Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)
 

    Payments During    

Last Fiscal Year
($)

 
 

Wendell P. Weeks

  Qualified Pension Plan    28     $1,104,606    $0     Qualified Pension Plan     29 $                         1,301,905   $0  
  ESPP    25(1)   14,654,710      0

Peter F. Volanakis

  Qualified Pension Plan    29      988,250      0
  ESPP    25(1)   13,380,714      0 

ESPP

 25(1)  17,371,029    0  

James B. Flaws

  Qualified Pension Plan  38      1,665,221      0 Qualified Pension Plan 39  1,760,715    0  
  ESPP  38      16,739,265      0 

ESPP

 39(2)  17,572,655    0  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  Qualified Pension Plan  10      167,798      0 Qualified Pension Plan 11  191,852    0  
  ESPP  10      2,680,545      0 

ESPP

 11(1)  2,974,044    0  

Kirk P. Gregg

  Qualified Pension Plan  17      369,738      0 Qualified Pension Plan 18  456,533    0  
  ESPP  25(2)   7,556,914      0 

ESPP

 25(3)  8,462,562    0  

Lawrence D. McRae

 Qualified Pension Plan 26  961,133    0  
 

ESPP

 25(1)  5,812,199    0  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

 Qualified Pension Plan 1  7,486    0  
 

ESPP

 1(1)  19,768    0  

51


 

(1)

Under Formula A, years of service are capped at 25 years, in determining benefits under the ESPP.

(2)

Under Formula B, years of service are uncapped with a formula of 1.5% per year in determining benefits under the ESPP.

(3)

Mr. Gregg’s 1993 employment letter, as amended in 2002, provides for nine extra years of benefit service under the ESPP for retirement on or after age 55. The additional value generated by these extra nine years of service is currently approximately $2,510,000.$2,357,000. Because of the 25-year cap on service under Formula A, implemented after Mr. Gregg was hired, some or all of these additional years of benefit service will not enhance Mr. Gregg’s total pension benefit, depending on his actual retirement date. For example, at age 55, Mr. Gregg will have 21 actual years of service so that only four of the nine additional years of service will

52


have any impact on his pension. At age 60, Mr. Gregg would have 26 actual years of service so that those additional years of service would not provide any incremental pension value. Additional years of service credit have not been provided to senior executives since this adjustment in 2002.

The compensation covered by the qualified pension plan and the ESPP for the Named Executive Officers is the “Salary” and GoalSharing and Performance Incentive Plan cash bonuses set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table”. Bonuses are included as compensation in the calendar year paid. For the 20102011 calendar year, the Named Executive Officers’ eligible earnings were $2,894,171$3,391,835 for Mr. Weeks; $2,218,063 for Mr. Volanakis; $2,028,075$2,313,252 for Mr. Flaws; $1,454,984$1,654,945 for Dr. Miller; and $1,378,450Miller $1,568,128 for Mr. Gregg.Gregg:; $1,397,045 for Mr. McRae; and $220,673 for Dr. Evenson. Final average compensation is used to determine benefits under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2010,2011, final average compensation was $2,588,249$2,727,870 for Mr. Weeks; $1,974,005 for Mr. Volanakis; $1,841,465$1,908,467 for Mr. Flaws; $1,321,421$1,369,914 for Dr. Miller; and $1,253,663$1,298,872 for Mr. Gregg.Gregg; $930,740 for Mr. McRae; and $220,673 for Dr. Evenson. Long-term cash or equity incentives are not (and have never been) considered as eligible earnings for determining retirement benefits under this plan.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The table below shows the contributions, earnings and account balances for the Named Executive Officers in the Supplemental Investment Plan. Pursuant to the Company’s Supplemental Investment Plan, certain executives, including the Named Executive Officers, may choose to defer up to 75% of annual base salary and up to 75% of non-equity incentive compensation. The participant chooses from the same funds available under our Company Investment Plan (401(k)) in which to “invest” the deferred amounts. No cash is actually invested in the unfunded accounts under the Supplemental Investment Plan. Deferred amounts incur gains and losses based on the performance of the individual participant’s investment fund selections. Participants may change their elections among these fund options. All of our current Named Executive Officers have more than three years with the Company, so each of the Named Executive Officer’s contributions from the Company match are fully vested. Participants cannot withdraw any amounts from their deferred compensation balances until retirement from the Company at or after age 55 with five years of service. Participants may elect to receive distributions as a lump sum payment or two to five annual installments. If a Named Executive Officer leaves the Company, prior to retirement, the account balance is distributed in a lump sum, six-months following the executive’s departure.

No Named Executive Officer withdrawals or distributions were made in 2010.2011.

 

(a)      (b)(1)   (c)(2)   (d)(3)   (e)   (f)        (b)   (c)   (d)   (e)   (f) 

Named Executive Officer

  Aggregate
Balance at
January 1,
2010
($)
   Executive
Contributions
in 2010
($)
   Registrant
Contributions
in 2010
($)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in 2010
($)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
in 2010
($)
   Aggregate
Balance as of
December 31,
2010
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
January 1,
2011
($)
   Executive
Contributions
in 2011(1)
($)
   Registrant
Contributions
in 2011(2)
($)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in 2011(3)
($)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
in 2011
($)
   Aggregate
Balance as of
December 31,
2011
($)
 

Wendell P. Weeks

  $1,758,742    $164,850    $169,658    $188,949    $0    $2,282,199    $        2,282,199    $        194,710    $        200,390    $        -121,038    $                    0    $        2,556,261  

Peter F. Volanakis

   3,346,272     432,612     133,569     632,991     0     4,545,445  

James B. Flaws

   2,553,735     207,938     111,648     261,621     0     3,134,943     3,134,943     247,895     129,258     21,450     0     3,533,546  

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

   418,231     102,496     20,499     54,599     0     595,825     595,825     146,886     57,398     19,651     0     819,760  

Kirk P. Gregg

   1,314,764     68,040     45,360     75,470     0     1,503,635     1,503,635     79,421     52,947     -232,544     0     1,403,459  

Lawrence D. McRae

   0     0     0     0     0     0  

Jeffrey W. Evenson

   0     0     0     0     0     0  

 

(1)

Reflects participation in the Supplemental Investment Plan by Messrs. Weeks, Volanakis, Flaws, Miller and Gregg in the deferral of a portion of their 20102011 base salaries and participation by Messrs. Weeks, Flaws, VolanakisMiller and Gregg in the deferral of a portion of the bonus received

52


in 20102011 for prior year performance. The Named Executive Officers’ contributions are included in the Summary Compensation Table, as a part of Salary and/or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.

(2)Reflects Company match on the Supplemental Investment Plan which was credited to the account of the Named Executive Officers in 2010.2011. All of these amounts are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table (and are also detailed in footnote (5) to that Table).
(3)

Reflects aggregate earnings on each type of deferred compensation listed above. The earnings on deferred base salary and bonus payments are calculated based on the actual returns from the same fund choices that Company employees have in the qualified 401(k) plan. Currently, employees have 1514 fund choices that they may select from. As nonqualified plans, these plans are unfunded which means that no actual dollars are

53


invested in these funds. The Company does not provide any above market interest rates or other special terms for any deferred amounts. These amounts are not included in the Change in Pension Value column of Summary Compensation Table.

Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

Severance Agreements

WeWith the exception of Dr. Evenson, we have entered into a severance agreement with each of our Named Executive Officers. The severance agreement terminates if the executive leaves the employ of Corning for any reason or ceases to be an officer of Corning. Effective for all new executive severance agreements and executive change in control agreements entered into after July 21, 2004, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors approved a policy to limit benefits that may be provided to an executive under any new agreement to 2.99 times the executive’s annual compensation of base salary plus target bonusincentive payments (the “Overall Limit”). All of the Named Executive Officers, other than Dr. Evenson, are parties to executive severance and change in control agreements executed prior to July 21, 2004 and, therefore, are not affected by the Overall Limit.

Severance Agreement—Mr. Weeks

Under Mr. Weeks’ severance agreement, if he is terminated involuntarily, and without “cause” (a conviction for a felony; commission of a fraud, theft or embezzlement that materially damages the financial condition of Corning; or gross abdication of duties), or as a result of disability, he is entitled to the following:

 

Base salary, reimbursable expenses and annual bonus accrued and owing as of the date of termination (lump sum payment);

Ÿ

Base salary, reimbursable expenses and annual bonus accrued and owing as of the date of termination (lump sum payment);

 

A severance amount equal to 2.99 times his then base salary plus an annual bonus amount (calculated at 100% of target that would have been paid for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs) (lump sum payment);

Ÿ

A severance amount equal to 2.99 times his then base salary plus an annual bonus amount (calculated at 100% of target that would have been paid for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs) (lump sum payment);

Ÿ

Continued participation in the Company’s benefit plans for up to three years;

 

Continued participation in the Company’s benefit plans for up to three years;

Ÿ

In the calendar year following the year in which the termination occurs (subject to a six-month waiting period), the purchase of his principal residence by the Company upon request; and

 

In the calendar year following the year in which the termination occurs (subject to a six-month waiting period), the purchase of his principal residence by the Company upon request; and

Receipt of an additional three years of service credit under Corning’s Executive Supplemental Pension Plan, but subject to the service limits under such plan.

Ÿ

Receipt of an additional three years of service credit under Corning’s Executive Supplemental Pension Plan, but subject to the service limits under such plan.

If however, Mr. Weeks is terminated for cause (as described above) or he resigns, he would: (1) be entitled to accrued, but unpaid salary (lump sum payment) and any reimbursable expenses accrued or owing to him; and (2) forfeit any outstanding stock option awards.

Severance Agreement—Other Named Executive Officers

Generally under the severance agreements, a Named Executive Officer is entitled to severance payments if he is terminated involuntarily other than for “cause” (conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; material breach of Corning’s Code of Conduct; gross abdication of duties; or misappropriation of Company assets or dishonesty or business conduct that causes material harm to Corning).

53


In addition, “involuntary termination” of an executive does not include:

 

Voluntary termination;

Voluntary retirement at or after age 55;

Termination as a result of disability or death;

54


Termination of employment as a result of the sale of all or part of Corning’s business and the executive has an opportunity to continue employment with buyer for comparable total compensation; and

Termination as a result of a change in control of Corning if the executive has a separate change in control agreement.

Ÿ

Voluntary termination;

Ÿ

Voluntary retirement at or after age 55;

Ÿ

Termination as a result of disability or death;

Ÿ

Termination of employment as a result of the sale of all or part of Corning’s business and the executive has an opportunity to continue employment with buyer for comparable total compensation; and

Ÿ

Termination as a result of a change in control of Corning if the executive has a separate change in control agreement.

Under the severance agreements, a Named Executive Officer other than Mr. Weeks and Dr. Evenson, is entitled to receive the following:

 

Accrued but unpaid base salary, reimbursable expenses, vacation pay and the executive’s target percentage for the annual bonus plans multiplied by the executive’s salary, pro-rated to the last day of the month closest to the termination date (lump sum payment);

Ÿ

Accrued but unpaid base salary, reimbursable expenses, vacation pay and the executive’s target percentage for the annual bonus plans multiplied by the executive’s salary, pro-rated to the last day of the month closest to the termination date (lump sum payment);

Ÿ

A severance amount equal to 2.99 times (in the case of Mr. Flaws) and two times (in the case of Messrs. Miller, Gregg, McRae and Evenson) the executive’s then base salary plus an annual bonus amount (an amount equal to executive’s salary multiplied by the executive’s target percentage in effect on the termination date under the Company’s Performance Incentive Plan and 5% target under the GoalSharing Plan) (lump sum payment);

Ÿ

Continued medical, dental and hospitalization benefits for 24 months;

Ÿ

In the calendar year following the year in which the termination occurs (subject to a six-month waiting period), the purchase of his principal residence by the Company upon request;

Ÿ

Receipt of an additional 2.99 years (in the case of Mr. Flaws) and two years (in the case of Messrs. Miller, Gregg, McRae and Evenson) of service credit under Corning’s nonqualified retirement plans, but subject to the service limits under such plan; and

Ÿ

Outplacement benefits up to a maximum amount of $50,000.

While Dr. Evenson has not yet signed a severance agreement, the Company has agreed to provide him with a severance benefit equal to 2.99 times (in the case of Mr. Flaws and Mr. Volanakis) and two times (in the case of Mr. Gregg and Dr. Miller) the executive’shis then base salary plus an annual bonus amount (an amount equal to executive’s salary multiplied by the executive’s target percentage in effect on the termination date under the Company’s Performance Incentive Plan and 5% target under the GoalSharing Plan) (lump sum payment);

Continued. Dr. Evenson would also receive assistance for continued medical, dental and hospitalization benefits for 24 months;benefits.

In the calendar year following the year in which the termination occurs (subject to a six-month waiting period), the purchase of his principal residence by the Company upon request;

Receipt of an additional 2.99 years (in the case of Mr. Flaws and Mr. Volanakis) and two years (in the case of Mr. Gregg and Dr. Miller) of service credit under Corning’s nonqualified retirement plans, but subject to the service limits under such plan; and

Outplacement benefits up to a maximum amount of $50,000.

 

5554


The following table reflects the amounts that would be payable under the various arrangements assuming termination occurred at December 31, 2010.2011.

Termination Scenarios (Including Severance, if Eligible)

 

Named Executive
Officer

  Description  Voluntary(1)  For
Cause(1)
  Death  Disability(1)  Without Cause
Named Executive
Officer Named
Executive Officer
    Voluntary(1) For
Cause(1)
 Death Disability(1) Without Cause

Wendell P. Weeks

  Severance Amount  $    n/a      $    n/a      $    n/a      $    n/a      $6,313,385 Severance Amount $ n/a $ n/a $ n/a $ n/a $8,578,161
  Value of Benefits Continuation  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  45,000(2)
  Value of Outplacement Services  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a
  Purchase of Principal Residence  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  200,000 to 1,000,000(3)
  Pension-NQ annuity  601,708  0  601,708  1,203,417  601,708
  Pension-NQ lump sum  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a
  Pension-Qualified annuity  90,708  90,708  45,354  90,708  90,708

Peter F. Volanakis

  Severance Amount  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  4,931,108
  Value of Benefits Continuation  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  30,000(2) Value of Benefits Continuation n/a n/a n/a n/a 48,000(2)
  Value of Outplacement Services  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  50,000 Value of Outplacement Services n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  Purchase of Principal Residence  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  200,000 to 1,000,000(3) Purchase of Principal Residence n/a n/a n/a n/a 200,000 to 1,000,000(3)
  Pension-NQ annuity  925,666  0  925,666  925,666  925,666 Pension-NQ annuity 634,420 0 634,420 1,268,839 634,420
  Pension-NQ lump sum  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a Pension-NQ lump sum n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  Pension-Qualified annuity  61,336  61,336  30,668  61,336  61,336 Pension-Qualified annuity 95,096 95,096 47,548 95,096 95,096

James B. Flaws

  Severance Amount  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  4,541,362 Severance Amount n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,142,501
  Value of Benefits Continuation  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  30,000(2) Value of Benefits Continuation n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,000(2)
  Value of Outplacement Services  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  50,000 Value of Outplacement Services n/a n/a n/a n/a 50,000
  Purchase of Principal Residence  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  200,000 to 1,000,000(3) Purchase of Principal Residence n/a n/a n/a n/a 200,000 to 1,000,000(3)
  Pension-NQ annuity  963,036  0  963,036  963,036  1,050,491 Pension-NQ annuity 987,800 0 987,800 987,800 1,074,963
  Pension-NQ lump sum  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a Pension-NQ lump sum n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  Pension-Qualified annuity  130,152  130,152  65,076  130,152  130,152 Pension-Qualified annuity 134,539 134,539 67,270 134,539 134,539

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  Severance Amount  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,196,000 Severance Amount n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,358,000
  Value of Benefits Continuation  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  30,000(2) Value of Benefits Continuation n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,000(2)
  Value of Outplacement Services  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  50,000 Value of Outplacement Services n/a n/a n/a n/a 50,000
  Purchase of Principal Residence  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  1,700,000 to 2,300,000(3) Purchase of Principal Residence n/a n/a n/a n/a 0
  Pension-NQ annuity  248,590  0  220,001  248,590  331,908 Pension-NQ annuity 274,042 0 274,042 274,042 329,587
  Pension-NQ lump sum  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a Pension-NQ lump sum n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  Pension-Qualified annuity  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a Pension-Qualified annuity 191,852 191,852 191,852 191,852 191,852
  Pension-Qualified lump sum  167,798  167,798  167,798  167,798  167,798

Kirk P. Gregg

  Severance Amount  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  2,080,800 Severance Amount n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,235,600
  Value of Benefits Continuation  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  30,000(2) Value of Benefits Continuation n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,000(2)
  Value of Outplacement Services  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  50,000 Value of Outplacement Services n/a n/a n/a n/a 50,000
  Purchase of Principal Residence  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  200,000 to 1,000,000(3) Purchase of Principal Residence n/a n/a n/a n/a 200,000 to 1,000,000(3)
  Pension-NQ annuity  312,937  0  312,937  625,874  312,937 Pension-NQ annuity 311,467 0 311,467 622,934 311,467
  Pension-NQ lump sum  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a Pension-NQ lump sum n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  Pension-Qualified annuity  23,878  23,878  11,939  23,878  23,878 Pension-Qualified annuity 23,878 23,878 11,949 23,878 23,878
  Pension-Qualified lump sum  186,207  186,207  186,207  186,207  186,207 Pension-Qualified lump sum 210,949 210,949 210,949 210,949 210,949

Lawrence D. McRae

 Severance Amount n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,096,500
 Value of Benefits Continuation n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,000(2)
 Value of Outplacement Services n/a n/a n/a n/a 50,000(3)
 Purchase of Principal Residence n/a n/a n/a n/a 200,000 to 1,000,000(3)
 Pension-NQ annuity 201,864 0 201,864 403,727 201,864
 Pension-NQ lump sum n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
 Pension-Qualified annuity 77,054 77,054 38,527 77,054 77,054

Jeffrey W. Evenson

 Severance Amount n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,445,000
 Value of Benefits Continuation n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,000(2)
 Value of Outplacement Services n/a n/a n/a n/a 50,000
 Purchase of Principal Residence n/a n/a n/a n/a 0
 Pension-NQ annuity 0 0 0 2,706 0
 Pension-NQ lump sum n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
 Pension-Qualified annuity 0 0 8.901 10,528 0

 

(1)

Nonqualified plan benefits shown for all Named Executive Officers are payable from the Executive Supplemental Pension Plan. The timing and form of the benefits payable in the table above for a voluntary termination are as follows: Messrs. Weeks, McRae, Gregg, and Gregg’sEvenson’s Executive Supplemental Pension Plan benefits are payable as a life annuity beginning at age 55. Messrs. Volanakis, Flaws and Miller’s benefits are payable as an immediate life annuity with six years guaranteed.

(2)

The value of medical and dental benefits continuation is estimated at $15,000$16,000 per year (three years of benefits continuation for Mr. Weeks and two years of benefits continuation for Messrs. Volanakis, Flaws, McRae, Gregg, Miller and Gregg)Evenson).

(3)

The Named Executive Officers may also request that Corning purchase their principal residence. Corning is unable to accurately and precisely estimate the value that may be delivered under this provision as it requires an independent appraisal of the executive’s residence as well as a calculation of the executive’s purchase price of the residence plus documented improvements made to the property. These values are not maintained by Corning in its normal course of business. They are required only if an executive is terminated. Under the terms of the severance agreements, an executive may request that the Company purchase the executive’s principal residence in the Corning, New York area. Such

55


purchase must be finalized in the calendar year following the year in which the executive’s termination occurred (subject to a six-month waiting period) and shall be made at the greater of (i) the residence’s appraised value at the termination date, as determined in accordance with the Company’s relocation policies in effect immediately prior to the involuntary termination, or (ii) the total cost of the residence plus improvements and tax gross-up as applicable (“Protected Value”), as determined in accordance with the Company’s Protected Value policy in effect as of the date of the relevant severance agreement. The values above represent estimates of how much the Protected Value calculation may exceed the appraised value of the property and includes an associated tax gross up.

56


Corning’s team approach, as applied to our Named Executive Officers’ compensation, results in similarly situated executives being treated similarly. Currently, the terms of both the severance and change in control agreements are bifurcated similarly between those Named Executive Officers who are Board members and those who are not ( i.e., cash severance payments range from two to 2.99 times the executives’ base salary and annual bonus amount and, except for Dr. Evenson, the receipt of two to three additional years of service credit under the retirement plans). These ranges and periods were not negotiated individually with the executives, but were put in place by the Committee, having determined that these terms and multiples were appropriate for such agreements.

Change In Control Agreements

We have entered into change in control agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers.Officers except Dr. Evenson who does not yet have a written agreement at this point. These agreements are intended to provide for continuity of management if there is a change in control of Corning. These agreements will be effective until the executive leaves the employ of Corning or until the executive ceases to be an officer of Corning.

The agreements define a “change in control” as any of the following (so long as the event is also a “change in control” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code):

 

Any person acquires 30% or more of Corning’s voting securities (a “beneficial owner”);

A beneficial owner increases his ownership from 30% or more to 50% or more of Corning’s voting securities;

A majority of Corning’s directors are replaced during the term of the agreement without approval of at least two-thirds of the existing directors or directors previously approved by the existing directors;

Consummation of any merger, consolidation or reorganization involving Corning, unless the outstanding voting securities of Corning prior to the transaction continue to represent at least 50% of the voting securities of Corning or the new company;

Corning is liquidated or dissolved; or

All or substantially all of Corning’s assets are disposed of or sold.

If during the term of the agreement, a change in control occurs, each Named Executive Officer is entitled to the following:

 

All restrictions on any restricted stock and stock options held by the executive lapse, the options vest and become immediately exercisable.

If: (A) Mr. Weeks (i) is terminated without “cause” (a conviction for a felony, fraud, theft or embezzlement against the Company, a gross abdication of duties), (ii) resigns for “good reason” (generally, a material adverse change in the executive’s title, position or responsibilities, a reduction in the executive’s base salary, relocation, a material reduction in the level of employee benefits, a material breach by the Company of its obligations under the agreement, or a successor company’s failure to honor the agreement) (such period, a “change in control period”), or (iii) resigns or is terminated for any reason within four years following a change in control, or (B) the employment of any Named Executive Officer, other than Mr. Weeks, is terminated (absent cause, by reason of death or disability, or by the executive for good reason) during a change in control period, or within four years following a change in control, each is entitled to the following:

 

Accrued but unpaid base salary, reimbursable expenses, vacation pay and the executive’s target percentage for the annual bonus plans multiplied by the executive’s salary, pro-rated to the last day of the month closest to the termination date (lump sum payment);

 

56


A severance amount equal to three times (for Messrs. Weeks Volanakis and Flaws) and two times (for Messrs. Gregg and Miller) his then base salary plus an annual bonus amount (such bonus amount being the greater of (i) the amount paid under the bonus plans in the full calendar year preceding the termination (in the case of Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Weeks, the average amount paid under the bonus plans in the two preceding calendar years) or (ii) his target percentage times his base salary in effect at termination) (lump sum payment);

57


the greater of (i) the amount paid under the bonus plans in the full calendar year preceding the termination (in the case of Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Weeks, the average amount paid under the bonus plans in the two preceding calendar years) or (ii) his target percentage times his base salary in effect at termination) (lump sum payment);

Continued participation in the Company’s benefit plans for 36 months;

All restrictions on any restricted stock and stock options would lapse and become vested and options would become immediately exercisable;

Upon request, purchase of his principal residence;

Receipt of an additional five years of service credit under Corning’s Executive Supplemental Pension Plan, subject to the service credit limits under the plan; and

Outplacement benefits (equal to 20% of base salary) (excluding Mr. Weeks).

If, a Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated for cause (for Mr. Weeks “cause” is described above; with respect to the other Named Executive Officers, “cause” means conviction for a felony or misdemeanor involving a crime of moral turpitude, misappropriation of Company assets, or gross abdication of duties), or resigns for other than good reason (described above), or the Named Executive Officer’s employment terminates by reason of death or disability (a physical or mental infirmity which impairs the executive’s ability to substantially perform his duties for 180 consecutive days or 180 days during any twelve month period), the Named Executive Officer is entitled to:

 

Accrued but unpaid base salary, reimbursable expenses, vacation pay and the executive’s target percentage for the annual bonus plans multiplied by the executive’s salary, pro-rated to the last day of the month closest to the termination date (lump sum payment).

In addition, each Named Executive Officer is generally entitled to receive a gross-up payment in an amount sufficient to make him whole for any federal excise tax on excess parachute payments imposed under Section 280G and 4999 of the Code. However, if the federal excise tax can be avoided by reducing the related payments by a present value of $45,000 or less, then the payment will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax and no gross up payment will be made to the Named Executive Officer.

The following table reflects the amounts that would be payable under the various arrangements assuming that a change in control occurred on December 31, 2010.2011.

 

Cash-based

Cash-based

 Equity-based Taxes 

Cash-based

 Equity-based Taxes 

Named Executive
Officer

 Cash
Severance
 Interrupted
Performance
Cycles
 ESPP Misc.
Benefits
 Excise
Tax
Gross
Up(1)
 Total
Cash-
based
 Interrupted
Performance
Cycles
 Stock-
based
Awards
 Total
Pre-
Tax
Benefit
 Less:
Employee
Income
Tax
 Excise
Tax(1)
 Total
After-
Tax
Benefit
  Cash
Severance
 Interrupted
Performance
Cycles
 ESPP Misc.
Benefits
 Excise
Tax
Gross
Up(1)
 

Total

Cash-

based

 Interrupted
Performance
Cycles
 

Stock-

based
Awards

 

Total

Pre-

Tax

Benefit

 

Less:
Employee
Income

Tax

 Excise
Tax(1)
 

Total

After-

Tax

Benefit

   

Wendell P. Weeks

 $17,687,244   $0   $14,852,895   $140,000   $—     $32,680,139   $0   $20,914,885   $53,595,023   $24,342,860   $—     $29,252,164   $12,568,500   $            0   $17,982,705   $140,000   $—     $30,691,205   $            0   $15,659,611   $46,350,816   $21,052,541   $—     $25,298,276   

Peter F. Volanakis

  8,016,014    0    13,713,887    140,000    —      21,869,901    0    18,862,286    40,732,187    18,500,559    —      22,231,628  

James B. Flaws

  6,840,540    0    14,624,513    140,000    —      21,605,053    0    10,580,041    32,185,094    14,618,470    —      17,566,624    6,557,510    0    15,602,277    140,000    —      22,299,786    0    7,281,817    29,581,603    13,435,964    —      16,145,639   

Joseph A. Miller, Jr.

  3,380,909    0    4,354,298    140,000    —      7,875,207    0    9,658,555    17,533,761    7,963,834    —      9,569,927    3,132,159    0    4,848,772    140,000    —      8,120,931    0    6,432,944    14,553,875    6,610,370    —      7,943,505   

Kirk P. Gregg

  3,113,448    0    7,652,156    140,000    —      10,905,604    0    6,976,948    17,882,552    8,122,255    —      9,760,297    2,968,232    0    8,425,915    140,000    —      11,534,147    0    5,086,809    16,620,956    7,549,238    —      9,071,718   

Lawrence D. McRae

  2,526,246    0    6,864,474    140,000    —      9,530,720    0    3,352,219    12,882,939    5,851,431    —      7,031,508   

Jeffrey W. Evenson

  1,445,000    0    354,411    140,000    —      1,939,411    0    276,270    2,215,680    1,006,362    —      1,209,318   

 

(1)

In accordance with IRS rules, the calculation of the excise tax gross-up is a complex calculation that can vary dramatically from year to year depending on the facts and variables applicable at the time of a change in control. For calculations performed at December 31, 2010,2011, none of the Named Executive Officers were subject to the excise tax, so as a result, no excise tax gross-up was applicable.

In addition to the above, the Named Executive Officers may also request that Corning purchase their principal residence. The value of such benefit is generally estimated to be in the range of $200,000 to $1,000,000 ($1,700,000 to $2,300,000 in the case of Dr. Miller).$1,000,000. Corning is unable to accurately and precisely estimate the value as it requires an independent appraisal of the executive’s residence, as well as, a calculation of the executive’s purchase price of such residence and any documented improvements made to the property. This is data that Corning does not maintain in its normal course of business. See footnote (2)(3) to the “Termination Scenarios” table on page 56.55.

 

5857


Director Compensation

Only independentnon-employee directors receive director fees. During 2010,2011, Corning paid to independentnon-employee directors:

 

anAn annual cash retainer of $60,000; and

 

$1,5001,750 for each Board, committee meeting or other special session attended.attended ($1,500 per meeting prior to March 2011).

Each committee chairman receives an additional retainer of $15,000 per year for his or her services as committee chairman. Mr. O’Connor received $25,000$8,333 of additional compensation for his services as Lead Director through April 2011 and Mr. Smithburg received $16,667 of additional compensation for his services as Lead Director during 2010.2011.

Through the 2003 or 2010 Equity Plans for Non-Employee Directors, each independentEach non-employee director annually receives a form of long-term equity compensation approved by the Compensation Committee. IndependentNon-employee directors generally receive their awards at the February meeting. If, however, a independentnon-employee director is appointed between the February meeting and December 31, then that director will receive his/her pro-rata award shortly after joining the Board.

During 2010,2011, Corning issued 5,0135,046 shares of restricted stock to each independent director under the 20032010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors, except for Mr. Houghton,O’Connor, who received 1,6711,682 shares under the 2003 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors,and Mr. Canning,Clark, who received 2,827 shares under the 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors and Mr. Tilton, who received 439685 shares under the 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors. These restricted shares are subject to forfeiture, and are not available for transfer or exercise until six months after the date of a director’s retirement or resignation. In addition, except as stated below,

During 2011, Corning grantedissued restricted stock to each independentnon-employee director options covering 2,345 shares of Common Stock under the 2003 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors. These options vest ratably over a three-year period and expire on February 2, 2020. Mr. Houghton was granted options covering 782 shares of Common Stock. These options vest ratably over a three year period and expire on February 2, 2020. Mr. Canning was granted options covering 1,323 shares of Common Stock under the 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors.Directors valued at $115,000. These options vest ratably overrestricted shares are subject to forfeiture, and are not available for transfer or exercise until six months after the date of a three-year perioddirector’s retirement or resignation. This reflects a change in practice from the prior year, where Non-Employee directors were granted an annual restricted stock award valued at $95,000 and expirean annual stock option grant valued on July 21, 2020. Mr. Tilton was granted options covering 205 shares of Common Stock under the 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors. These options vest ratably over a three-year period and expire on November 30, 2020.grant date at $20,000.

IndependentNon-employee directors are reimbursed for expenses (including costs of travel, food and lodging) incurred in attending Board, committee and shareholder meetings. While travel to such meetings may include the use of Company aircraft, if available or appropriate under the circumstances, the directors generally use commercial transportation or their own transportation. Directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses associated with other business activities, including participation in Director education programs.

Directors may defer any portion of their cash compensation. Amounts deferred may be paid only in cash and while deferred may be allocated to (1) an account earning interest, compounded quarterly, at the rate equal to the greater of the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. at the end of each calendar quarter or the rate of return for the stable value fund under Corning’s Investment Plans, (2) an account based upon the market value of our Common Stock from time to time, or (3) a combination of such accounts. At December 31, 2010, eight2011, seven directors had elected to defer compensation.

Corning has a Directors’ Charitable Giving Program pursuant to which a director may direct the Company to make a charitable bequest to one or more qualified charitable organizations recommended by such director and approved by Corning in the amount of $1,000,000 (employee directors) or $1,250,000 (independent(non-employee directors) following his or her death. We fund this program by purchasing insurance policies on the lives of the directors. However, we are under no obligation to use the proceeds of the insurance policies to fund a director’s bequest and can elect to retain any proceeds from the policies as assets of Corning and use another source of funds to pay the directors’ bequests. In 2010,2011, we paid a total of $ $220,492$29,626 in premiums and fees on such policies for our current directors. Because the charitable deductions and cash surrender value of life insurance policies accrue solely to Corning, the directors derive no financial benefit from the Program, and we do not include these

59


amounts in the directors’ compensation. Generally, one must be a director for five years to participate in the Program. In 2010,2011, Messrs. Brown, Cummings, Flaws, Gund, Houghton, O’Connor, Ruding, Smithburg, Tookes Volanakis,and Weeks and Ms.Dr. Rieman were eligible to participateparticipated in the program.

58


Directors are also eligible to participate in the Corning Foundation Matching Gift Program for eligible charitable organizations. This Program is available to all Corning employees. The maximum matching gift amount available from the Foundation for each participant in the Program is $5,000 in any calendar year.

Corning also pays premiums on directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies covering directors.

From time to time, spouses may also join independentnon-employee directors when traveling to or from Board, committee or shareholder meetings, which may include the use of Company aircraft. While Corning generally incurs no additional cost, this travel may result in the independentnon-employee director recognizing income for tax purposes. Corning does not reimburse the independentnon-employee director for the estimated taxes incurred in connection with such income.

Director Summary Compensation Table

The following table discloses the cash, equity awards and other compensation earned, paid or awarded, as the case may be, to each of the Company’s independentnon-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.2011.

 

(a)  (b)   (c)(1)   (d)(2)   (e)   (f)   (g) (h)   (b)   (c)(1)   (d)(2)   (e)   (f)   (g) (h) 

Name

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)
   Option
Awards
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
   All Other
Compensation
 Total
($)
   Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)
   Option
Awards
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
   All Other
Compensation
 Total
($)
 

John S. Brown

  $111,000    $94,996    $19,135    $—      $—      $—      225,132  

John Seely Brown

  $122,750    $114,998    $—      $—      $—      $—     $237,748  

John A. Canning, Jr.

   58,500     47,494     9,658     —       —       5,000(3)   120,652     128,000     114,998     —       —       —       5,000(3)   247,998  

Robert F. Cummings Jr.

   114,000     94,996     19,135     —       —       —      228,132  

Richard T. Clark

   17,250     9,590     —       —       —       —      26,840  

Robert F. Cummings, Jr.

   122,750     114,998     —       —       —       —      237,748  

Gordon Gund

   126,000     94,996     19,135     —       —       5,000(3)   245,132     144,500     114,998     —       —       —       5,000(3)   264,498  

Carlos M. Gutierrez(5)

   109,500     94,996     19,135     —       —       —      223,632  

James R. Houghton(6)

   35,000     31,665     6,514     —       —       72,042(4)   145,221  

Kurt M. Landgraf

   129,000     94,996     19,135     —       —       5,000(3)   248,132     141,500     114,998     —       —       —       —      256,498  

James J. O’Connor

   166,000     94,996     19,135     —       —       5,000(3)   285,132  

James J. O’Connor(4)

   65,583     38,333     —       —       —       6,061(5)   109,977  

Deborah D. Rieman

   130,500     94,996     19,135     —       —       —      244,632     133,250     114,998     —       —       —       —      248,248  

H. Onno Ruding

   133,500     94,996     19,135     —       —       —      247,632     144,750     114,998     —       —       —       —      259,748  

William D. Smithburg

   133,500     94,996     19,135     —       —       —      247,632     169,417     114,998     —       —       —       —      284,415  

Glenn F. Tilton

   14,000     7,920     1,595     —       —       —      23,514     128,250     114,998     —       —       —       5,000(3)   248,248  

Hansel E. Tookes II

   111,000     94,996     19,135     —       —       —      225,132     123,000     114,998     —       —       —       —      237,998  

Mark S. Wrighton

   117,000     94,996     19,135     —       —       5,000(3)   236,132     138,250     114,998     —       —       —       5,000(3)   258,248  

 

(1)

The amounts in column (c) reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards of restricted stock granted pursuant to the 2003 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors or 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 19 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2011.13, 2012. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized. As of December 31, 2010,2011, each Director had the following number of award shares outstanding: 55,66660,712 for Mr.Dr. Brown; 2,8277,873 for Mr. Canning; 18,363685 for Mr. Clark; 23,409 for Mr. Cummings; 55,66660,712 for Mr. Gund; 7,355 for Mr. Gutierrez; 0 for Mr. Houghton; 16,63421,680 for Mr. Landgraf; 55,6660 Mr. O’Connor; 53,29058,336 for Ms.Dr. Rieman; 55,66660,712 for Mr.Dr. Ruding; 55,66660,712 for Mr. Smithburg; 4395,485 for Mr. Tilton; 40,54045,586 for Mr. Tookes; and 11,99017,036 for Mr.Dr. Wrighton. Total stock holdings for directors as of December 31, 2010 are shown in the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” table.

(2)The amounts in column (d) reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards of

No stock options were granted pursuant to the 2003 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors and 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Assumptions usednon-employee directors in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 19 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2011. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value amounts will ever be realized. As of December 31, 2010,2011, each Director has the following number of options outstanding: 28,631 for Mr.Dr. Brown; 1,323 for Mr. Canning; 0 for Mr. Clark; 11,872 for Mr. Cummings; 71,54128,631 for Mr. Gund; 3,832 for Mr. Gutierrez; 1,473,901 for Mr. Houghton; 9,868 for Mr. Landgraf; 24,50917,759 Mr. O’Connor; 69,43138,631 for Ms.Dr. Rieman; 69,43138,631 for Mr.Dr. Ruding; 35,38128,631 for Mr. Smithburg; 205 for Mr. Tilton; 28,631 for Mr. Tookes; and 6,775 for Mr.Dr. Wrighton.

60


(3)

Reflects a $5,000 charitable donation match made by Corning Foundation’s Matching Gift Program.

(4)Includes costs attributable to

Mr. O’Connor resigned from the following: the aggregate incremental cost of Mr. Houghton’s use of Company aircraft valued at $22,893 (See footnote Board on April 28, 2011.

(5) of the Summary Compensation Table to determine how items are valued); other travel expenses at $2,684; home and personal security at $3,114; office space at $1,090; salaries and benefits for administrative staff at $32,412; office supplies and services at $1,598; computer/information technology services and expenses at $2,936;

Reflects a $5,000 charitable donation match made by Corning Foundation’s Matching Gift Program;Program and annual service award of $315.$1,061 for a flight taken by Mr. O’Connor’s wife on a Corning aircraft.

(5)Mr. Gutierrez resigned from the Board on December 31, 2010.
(6)Mr. Houghton retired from the Board on April 29, 2010.

59


Report of Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its general oversight of Corning’s financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors—a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. The directors who serve on the Audit Committee have no financial or personal ties to Corning (other than director compensation and equity ownership as described in this proxy statement) and are all “financially literate” and “independent” for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that none of the Audit Committee members have a relationship with Corning that may interfere with the member’s independence from Corning and its management.

The Audit Committee met with management periodically during the year to consider the adequacy of Corning’s internal controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed these matters with Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm and with the appropriate financial personnel and internal auditors. The Audit Committee also discussed with Corning’s senior management and independent registered public accounting firm the process used for certifications by Corning’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer which is required for certain of Corning’s filings with the SEC. The Audit Committee met privately with both the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors, both of whom have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for: the preparation, presentation and integrity of Corning’s financial statements; accounting and financial reporting principles; establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)); establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)); evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures; evaluating the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; and evaluating any change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as well as expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

During the course of 2010,2011, management updated the documentation, and performed testing and evaluation of Corning’s system of internal control over financial reporting in response to the requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations. The Audit Committee was kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation and it provided oversight and advice to management during the process. In connection with this oversight, the Audit Committee received periodic updates provided by management and the independent registered public accounting firm at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting. At the conclusion of the process, management provided the Audit Committee with, and the Audit Committee reviewed a report on, the effectiveness of Corning’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also reviewed: the report of management contained in Corning’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20102011 filed with the SEC; as well as PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in Corning’s Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

61


The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by SAS 114, “The Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance,” and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements.” In addition, the Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and

60


discussed with them their independence from Corning and its management. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of permitted non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to Corning is compatible with the auditor’s independence.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors approved that the audited financial statements be included in Corning’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.2011.

The Audit Committee:

Kurt M. Landgraf, Chairman

John A. Canning, Jr.Richard T. Clark

Robert F. Cummings, Jr.

Deborah D. Rieman

H. Onno Ruding

Glenn F. Tilton

Mark S. Wrighton

62


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table summarizes fees billed to Corning by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and affiliates for professional services rendered for the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2010:2011:

 

  2010     2011 
  2009   2010   

 

 

 

Audit Fees

  $5,734,000    $5,868,000    $  5,868,000      $  8,519,000 

Audit Related Fees

   751,000     677,000     677,000       638,000  

Tax Fees

   626,000     628,000     628,000       642,000  

All Other Fees

   24,000     234,000     234,000       93,000 
          

 

 

 

Total Fees

  $7,135,000    $7,407,000    $7,407,000      $9,892,000  
          

 

     

 

 

Audit Fees.  These fees compriseare comprised of professional services rendered in connection with the audit of Corning’s consolidated financial statements (including the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting) and selected international locations, reviews of Corning’s quarterly consolidated financial statements on Form 10-Q that are customary under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States.States and an audit performed for a transaction which did not occur which was responsible for the majority of the year over year change ($2,210,000). Audit fees also include statutory audits of Corning’s foreign jurisdiction subsidiaries, comfort letters (in 2010), and consents for other SEC filings. Audit fees also include fees for professional services rendered forfilings and reviews of documents filed with the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.SEC.

Audit Related Fees.  These fees compriseare comprised of professional services rendered in connection with due diligence pertaining to acquisitions, internal control reviews, procedures to translate certain financial statements for foreign subsidiaries, employee benefit plan audits and procedures to verify certain capital assets.assets (2010).

Tax Fees.  These fees compriseare comprised of statutory tax compliance, preparation and assistance for Corning’s foreign jurisdiction subsidiaries, expatriate tax return compliance, and other tax compliance projects.

All Other Fees.  Includes a fee relating to licensing technical accounting software from the independent registered public accounting firm, and a fee to subscribe to certain benchmarking studies published by the independent registered public accounting firm, and fees relating to a finance benchmarking project.project (2010), and legal related document production requests (2011).

61


Policy Regarding Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services by Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm. The full Audit Committee approves annually projected services and fee estimates for these services and establishes budgets for major categories of services. The Audit Committee Chairman has been designated by the Audit Committee to approve any services arising during the year that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee and services that were pre-approved but the associated fees will materially exceed the budget established for the type of service at issue. Services approved by the Chairman are communicated to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. For each proposed service, the independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide supporting documentation detailing said service. The Audit Committee regularly reviews summary reports detailing services provided to Corning by its independent registered public accounting firm.

PROPOSAL 2—Advisory Vote on2

Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

Our Board of Directors is requesting that shareholders approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed, pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, in the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, beginning on page 26.41.

 

This includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the supporting tabular and narrative disclosure on executive compensation.

 

63


This vote is advisory and not binding on our Company, but the Board of Directors values the opinions that shareholders express in their voting and will consider the outcome of the vote in the future.

Most Recent Say on Pay Vote Result

Last year, Corning received 96% shareholder support from the non-binding Say on Pay advisory vote. We view this as an affirmation of our current pay practices and, as a result, no significant changes were made to our executive compensation pay practices in 2011.

Company Performance and Pay Alignment

We believe thatWhile fiscal year 2011 proved to be a challenging year, Corning’s executive pay program aligned with financial and stock performance by paying out at significantly below target amounts.

In 2011, we reported strong revenue growth, but our profitability was lower than in 2010. Reported results were as follows:

Revenue of $7.9 billion compared to $6.6 billion for 2010; a 19% increase and a record year;

Net profit after tax (“NPAT”) of $2,805 million compared to $3,558 million for 2010, a 21% decrease;

Earnings per share of $1.77 compared to $2.25 per share for 2010, a 21% decrease; and

Operating cash flow of $3,189 million compared to $3,835 million for 2010, a 17% decrease.

In 2011 our financial results fell significantly below target. Since we set rigorous performance goals for 2011, our incentive payouts were sharply reduced. As a result:

2011 annual bonus earned at 10% of target for NEOs;

2011 GoalSharing earned at 5.05% of base salary;

2011 Cash Performance Units earned at 60% of target;

2011 Stock Option grants are underwater; and

62


Value of 2011 time based restricted stock units declined approximately 30% during the year.

Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is well designed to support Corning’s strategic framework for creating shareholder value. Our management balances near-term results with long-term success, to grow revenue and profits and build long-term value through innovation.

Highlights of our 2010 financial results include:

Adjusted net profit after tax of $2,883 million compared to $2,061 million for 2009, a 40% increase;

Adjusted earnings per share of $1.82 compared to $1.31 per share for 2009, a 39% increase;

Adjusted operating cash flow of $2,723 million compared to $2,029 million for 2009, a 34% increase; and

Revenue of $6.6 billion compared to $5.4 billion for 2009, a 23% increase.

Compensation Program

Highlights of our executive compensation program include:

 

On average, 84%82% of the target total direct compensation of our Named Executive Officers, excludesongoing NEOs, excluding benefits and perquisites, is delivered in annual and long-term incentives that vary based on achievement of our annual financial targets or the price of our stock.

 

Annual incentives awarded to our Named Executive Officers under our Performance Incentive and Goal SharingGoalSharing Plans depend solely on Corning’s consolidated financial performance.

 

Our long-term incentive program is composed of a balanced portfolio of cash performance units, stock options, and time-based restricted stock units. These components comprise 50%, 25% and 25% of the target long-term incentive value, respectively, and vest over 3three years.

 

Annual dilution associated with grants of stock options and restricted stock totaled less than 1% in 2010.2011.

 

We adjust our pay practices as necessary to reflect economic conditions, as evidenced by our decision to suspend annual salary reviews in 2009.

Our executive compensation program has evolved over time to reflect changing governance standards:

 

Our Named Executive OfficersNEOs are subject to stock ownership guidelines; ownership of each Named Executive Officerongoing NEO’s ownership exceeded the guideline amount in 2010.2011.

 

Our equity plan prohibits the repricing of stock options without shareholder approval.

 

A clawback policy was adopted in 2007, allowing the Committee to recoup payments based upon financial results subsequently subject to restatement.

 

A hedgingAn anti-hedging policy prohibits officers and directors from trading in options or any Corning stock derivatives or otherwise profit from short-term speculative swings in the value of Corning stock.

 

Benefits under all executive severance and change-in-control agreements entered into after 2004 are limited to 2.99 times the sum of base salary and target bonus.

 

We capped the percentage of cash compensation earned as a retirement benefit under our Executive Supplemental Pension Plan.

 

64


We do not provide tax assistance or tax gross-up payments on perquisites.

 

Reload stock options were discontinued in 2003.

The Company regularly reviews internal pay equity among the Company’s top executives.

For these reasons, the Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the resolution:

RESOLVED, that on an advisory non-binding basis, the total compensation paid to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officerNamed Executive Officers (CEO, CFO and four other most highly compensated executives (the “named executive officers”)executives), as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statementproxy statement for the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Item 402 of Regulation S-K), including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis various compensation tables and the supporting tabular and related narrative discussiondisclosure on executive compensation is hereby APPROVED.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

PROPOSAL 3—Advisory Vote on Frequency of an Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The Company seeks a non-binding advisory vote from its shareholders regarding the desired frequency for holding a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our executive officers, as is set forth in Proposal 2 this proxy statement. This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views as to whether the non-binding advisory vote on our executive compensation practices should occur every one, two, or three years. A shareholder may also abstain from voting in this proposal. This vote is advisory, and, therefore, it will not be binding upon the Board. The Board of Directors, however, will take into account the outcome of the vote when deciding the frequency of the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation practices.

Shareholders may choose among the four choices set forth in the resolution below and are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation provided below.

We believe that an annual advisory vote (Choice 1) provides for the most consistent communication with shareholders, allowing for regular input on our compensation program and practices.

RESOLVED, shareholders of the Company determine, on an advisory basis, that the frequency with which the shareholders of the Company shall have an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers set forth in the Company’s proxy statement is:

 

Choice 1 – every year63


Choice 2 – every two years

ChoicePROPOSAL 3 – every three years

Choice 4 – abstain from voting

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDSCHOICE 1—EVERY YEAR,

AS THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH SHAREHOLDERS ARE PROVIDED AN ADVISORY VOTE

ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES.

PROPOSAL 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm. At the meeting of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors held on February 2, 2011,1, 2012, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the 20112012 fiscal year. Although shareholder approval for this appointment is not required, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors are submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for ratification to obtain the views of shareholders. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the shareholders’ views in the future selection of Corning’s auditors.

65


In making the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending 2011,December 31, 2012, the Audit Committee considered whether PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining independence as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Corning expects representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to be present at the Annual Meeting and available to respond to questions which may be raised there. These representatives may comment on the financial statements if they so desire.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2011.

PROPOSAL 4

To Approve the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan

PROPOSAL 5—Shareholder Proposal

Overview.  The Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) is a continuation of similar long-term incentive plans first adopted in 1974. The 2012 Plan is designed to provide a flexible mechanism to permit employees to obtain equity ownership in Corning, thereby increasing their proprietary interest in Corning’s growth and success. The Board of Directors Unanimously Recommends A VOTE AGAINST This Proposal 5.believes that long-term incentives are a critical element in Corning’s plans for future growth and Corning’s total compensation program and should be continued.

Ram Trust Services,In February 2012, the Board approved the 2012 Plan and directed it be submitted to shareholders for approval at this time. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Corning’s Common Stock cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the 2012 Plan. If shareholders approve, the 2012 Plan will become effective on May 1, 2012 and will expire on the tenth anniversary of the effective date. The 2012 Plan replaces the 2005 Employee Equity Participation Program (the “2005 Program”) which expires by its terms in May 2013. In the event shareholders do not approve, the 2012 Plan will not become effective and the 2005 Program will continue until its scheduled expiration in May 2013, or when shares are no longer available, whichever is earlier.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan will enable Corning to continue to offer long-term performance based compensation through the grant of a variety of awards. Awards

64


available under the 2012 Plan include stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance stock, performance units or other awards granted by the Compensation Committee.

Approval of the 2012 Plan will coincide with the termination of the 2005 Program, allowing for the retirement of 40 million shares that are unused under the 2005 Program.

After factoring in the 85 million share reserve under the 2012 Plan and the retirement of remaining shares under the 2005 Program, Corning’s overhang from equity plans and outstanding stock options is less than 10 % on a diluted basis.

The 2012 Plan prohibits repricing options and stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval.

The 2012 Plan includes a recoupment policy where gains may be subject to clawback if appropriate or required.

The 2012 Plan includes minimum vesting of three years on time-based awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units and minimum vesting of one year on performance-based awards.

A copy of the 2012 Plan is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.

Committee. The 2012 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors, consisting of three or more independent directors, whose members shall meet the requirements of Section 16(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the definition of an address at 45 Exchange Street Portland, Maine 04101, holds 93,675“outside director” under the regulations promulgated pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No member of the Committee or non-employee member of the Board is eligible to participate in the 2012 Plan. The Committee may delegate to an executive officer of Corning certain rights and responsibilities, including the limited right to grant awards to individuals, except that only the Committee may grant awards to officers.

Eligibility.  The Committee will select the individuals who are eligible to participate in the 2012 Program. These individuals may include executives and employees (including officers and employees who are directors) of Corning and its affiliates.

Stock.  Under the 2012 Plan, the maximum number of shares of Corning Common Stock that may be granted to eligible participants is 85,000,000. Shares granted under prior plans, including the 2000 Employee Equity Participation Program and on behalfthe 2005 Program, will be canceled and will not be available for grant under the 2012 Plan.

At any given time, the number of Elizabeth Curriershares remaining available for issuance under the 2012 Plan will be reduced by the number of 1 Smither’s Way, Scarborough, Maine, 04074 as beneficial ownershares subject to outstanding awards and, for awards that are not denominated in shares, by the number of 500 shares proposes to presentactually delivered in settlement of the award. When determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the following resolutionwillnot be added back to the shares available for adoptionissuance:

The number of shares that are tendered by a Participant or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of an award or to satisfy the Participant’s tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise or settlement of an award;

All of the shares covered by a stock-settled stock appreciation right to the extent exercised; and

Any Shares that are forfeited or cancelled or otherwise expire for any reason without having been exercised or settled under the 2005 Program.

Shares issued or options granted to settle, assume or substitute outstanding awards or obligations to grant future awards as a condition to the purchase, merger or consolidation of another entity by Corning; and (ii) shares unallocated and available for grant under a stock plan of another entity acquired by Corning, based on the applicable exchange ratio, will not reduce the number of shares available for issuance.

65


Shares of Corning’s Common Stock which are granted under the 2012 Plan may be authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, shares acquired by the Company on the open market or a combination of these.

The 2012 Plan prohibits repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval, including amendment of outstanding awards to reduce the exercise price and cancellation of outstanding options or rights in exchange for cash or property, options or rights with lower exercise prices or other awards.

The 2012 Plan provides for appropriate adjustments in the aggregate number of shares and in the number of shares and the price per share, or either, of outstanding options in the case of changes in the capital stock of Corning resulting from any corporate event or distribution of stock or property in order to preserve, but not increase, the value of awards available under the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan also provides that in any merger or consolidation in which Corning is not the survivor and in which awards are not granted in substitution of awards outstanding under the 2012 Plan, or predecessor plans, the Committee may make provision for adjustments and/or settlements of outstanding awards as it deems appropriate and consistent with the 2012 Plan’s purposes.

Grant of Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights  Under the 2012 Plan, the Committee may grant to eligible employees either non-qualified or “incentive” stock options, or both, to purchase shares of Corning’s Common Stock at not less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant. No stock option may be outstanding for more than ten years. The Committee may also provide that options may not be exercised in whole or in part for any period or periods of time. The number of shares covered by incentive stock options that may be first exercised by an individual in any year cannot have an aggregate fair market value in excess of $100,000, measured at the Annual Meetingdate of shareholders. In accordancegrant. The maximum number of shares that may be issued in connection with applicable proxy regulations, weincentive stock options intended to comply with Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, shall be 85,000,000. The Committee may provide that in the event the employment of an employee is terminated, the right to exercise options held under the 2012 Plan may continue through its original expiration date or for such shorter period of time after such event as the Committee may determine appropriate. Options are not assignable or transferable except for limited circumstances such as death and, with the consent of the Committee, to certain family members to assist with estate planning. The 2012 Plan does not permit an optionee to defer recognition of gain upon the exercise of a stock option.

The 2012 Plan permits the granting of stock appreciation rights which permit an optionee to receive an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value on the date of grant and the market price of the Common Stock on the date the right is exercised, payable in cash or shares. No stock appreciation right may be outstanding for more than 10 years.

The option price is to be paid to Corning by the optionee, in full, concurrently with the issuance or delivery of the stock. The optionee may pay the option price in cash or with shares of Corning’s Common Stock owned by the optionee, or by such other means as the Committee may authorize. The optionee has no rights as a shareholder with respect to the shares subject to option until shares are issued upon exercise of the option.

Grant of Shares, Share Units and Cash Units.  Under the 2012 Plan, the Committee may award to eligible employees shares, or the right to receive shares of Corning’s Common Stock, or the right to receive cash payments. The Committee determines the number of shares or amount of cash awarded to individual employees and the number of rights covering shares to be issued. The Committee determines the conditions, restrictions and contingencies placed upon the grant of shares or cash, except that time-based shares and share units shall have minimum vesting over three years and performance based awards shall have minimum vesting of one year. These conditions and contingencies may include the followingattainment of predetermined performance goals, such as operating or net profits, cash flow, earnings per share, profit returns, margins, revenues, shareholder proposalreturns and/or value, stock price, economic value added and supporting statementsworking capital and any other goal that meets the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as submittedamended. The shares or cash awarded to or earned by individual employees are subject to transfer restriction and/or forfeiture for a period of time as determined by the proponent.

Special Shareowner Meetings

RESOLVED, Shareowners ask our board to takeCommittee in its discretion. The restrictions on transfer and the steps necessary unilaterally (topossibility of forfeiture may be waived, with the fullest extent permittedapproval of the Committee, if an employee’s employment relationship is terminated by law) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holdersreason of 10% of our outstanding common stock (or the lowest percentage permitted by law above 10%) the power to call a special shareowner meeting.

This includes that such bylaw and/or charter text will not have any exception or exclusion conditions (to the fullest extent permitted by law) in regard to calling a special meeting that apply only to shareowners but not to management and/or the board.

Special meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors, that can arise between Annual Meetings. If shareowners cannot call special meetings, management may become insulated and investor returns may suffer. Shareowner input on the timing of shareowner meetings is especially important during a major restructuring -when events unfold quickly and issues may become moot by the next Annual Meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

This proposal topic also won more than 60% support at the following companies: CVS Caremark, Sprint Nextel, Safeway, Motorola and R. R. Donnelley.

The merits of this Special Shareowner Meetings proposal should also be considered in the context of other shareholder efforts to improve our company’s corporate governance:

For instance, a 2010 shareowner proposal on the Simple Majority Vote topic won more than 85% support at our Annual Meeting. This 85% support also represented impressive 66% support from all shares outstanding, including shares that did not vote. The Council of Institutional Investors www.cii.org recommends that management adopt shareholder proposals upon receiving their first majority vote.death, disability

 

66


Please encourage our boardor retirement, or by reason of a subsidiary ceasing to respond positivelybe such. In addition, the Committee may remove, in its discretion, in whole or in part, the restrictions on sale or transfer and the possibility of forfeiture in the event of the termination of employment if circumstances so warrant. Shares may be issued to this proposal regarding Special Shareowner Meetings.recognize past performance either generally or upon attainment of specific objectives. Shares issuable for performance will be payable only to the extent the Committee determines that an eligible employee has met such objectives and will generally be valued as of the date of such determination. No employee shall have any right to receive shares or cash based upon the attainment of objectives prior to the expiration of the date set for the performance of objectives unless (i) otherwise determined by the Committee or (ii) the participant’s employment is terminated by reason of disability or retirement, in each case with the consent of Corning.

Program Limitations.    Under the 2012 Plan, not more that 1,500,000 shares may be granted to any participant in any calendar years in any form (i.e., options, stock appreciation rights or shares of restricted stock). In addition, the maximum amount of awards denominated in cash to any participant in any calendar year is $15,000,000.

Taxation.    Corning believes that the federal income tax consequences of the 2012 Plan are as follows:

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSEStock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.    No income will be recognized by an optionee at the time either a non-qualified option, an Incentive Stock Option or a stock appreciation right is granted. An optionee who exercises a non-qualified option or a stock appreciation right will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (subject, in the case of employees, to withholding) in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, and Corning or the subsidiary employing the optionee will be entitled to a deduction from income in the same amount. The optionee’s basis in such shares will be increased by the amount taxable as compensation, and the optionees’ capital gain or loss when the shares are sold will be calculated using such increased basis. The capital gain or loss on disposition of the shares will be either long-term or short-term depending on the holding period of the shares.

If all applicable requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, are met with respect to Incentive Stock Options, including the requirement that the stock be held for more than two years from the date of grant of the option and more than one year from the date of exercise, no income to the optionee will be recognized at the time of exercise of an Incentive Stock Option. The excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the amount paid is an item of tax preference, which may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. In general, if an Incentive Stock Option is exercised after three months of termination of employment, or if the shares are sold within one year of the date of exercise or two years from the date of grant, the optionee will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise or the sale price. Any excess of the sale price over the fair market value on the date of exercise will be taxed as a capital gain. Corning will be entitled to a tax deduction only if its employee recognizes ordinary income and only in the amount of income the employee recognizes.

Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units.    Shares of Common Stock awarded to an employee which are not subject to restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture will be taxed as ordinary income, subject to withholding, at the time of the transfer of the shares to the participant. Subject to any applicable limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the value of such awards will be deductible by Corning or by the subsidiary employing the employee at the same time and in the same amount. Shares subject to restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture will not be subject to tax nor will such grant result in a tax deduction for Corning at the time of award. However, when such shares become free of restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture, the fair market value of such shares at that time (i) will be treated as ordinary income to the employee and (ii) subject to any applicable limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, will be deductible by Corning or by the subsidiary employing the employee.

Alternatively, an employee receiving shares subject to restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture may elect to include in his or her gross income, for the taxable year in which such shares are transferred to him or her, the fair

67


market value of such shares at that time; in such case, he or she need not include any amount in gross income at the time the shares become free of restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture. However, an employee making such an election will not be allowed a deduction if the shares are subsequently forfeited. The employee will have a tax basis for the shares equal to their fair market value at the time they are included in gross income and will realize long-term or short-term capital gain on disposition of the shares depending upon the holding period of the shares, which will commence at the time the employee is deemed to be in receipt of ordinary income with respect to such shares.

Restricted share units awarded to an employee will be taxed as ordinary income, subject to withholding, at the time of the units are settled or paid to the participant. Subject to any applicable limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the value of such awards will be deductible by Corning or by the subsidiary employing the employee at the same time and in the same amount.

Certain awards under the 2012 Plan may be subject to the requirements applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Although Corning intends that awards will satisfy those requirements, if they do not, employees may be subject to additional income taxes and interest under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Amendment, Administration and Termination.    The 2012 Plan expires May 1, 2021 and no awards may be granted after that date. The Board of Directors is authorized to terminate or amend the 2012 Plan, except that no such termination or amendment is effective without the approval of shareholders, if such approval is required.

New Plan Benefits Table.    See “Plan Based Awards” on page 44 for information about awards made to the named executive officers under the 2005 Program during fiscal year 2011.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL ANDUNANIMOUSLYRECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST PROPOSAL 5 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:APPROVAL OF THE CORNING INCORPORATED 2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We believe it would be costly, burdensomeThe following table shows the total number of outstanding options and disruptiveshares available for other future issuances of options under all of our existing equity compensation plans, including our 2010 Variable Compensation Plan, our 2005 Employee Equity Participation Program, and our 2010 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors as of December 31, 2011.

   A  B  C 

Plan Category

  Securities To Be
Issued  Upon Exercise
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column A)
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1)

   65,027,358   $        15.91    47,683,271  

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved Security Holders

   0   $0.00    0  

Total

   65,027,358   $15.91    47,683,271  

(1)

Shares indicated are total grants under the most recent shareholder approved plans as well as any shares remaining outstanding from any prior shareholder approved plans.

68


PROPOSAL 5

To Approve Amendment and Restatement of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit holdersRemove the Provisions Currently Requiring a Supermajority Vote of only 10%the Company’s Shareholders

Background: The Company’s Restated Certificate of Corning’sIncorporation (“Certificate”) currently requires the affirmative vote of 80% of the total number of shares outstanding sharesand entitled to call special meetings. A special meetingvote to amend, alter or repeal Section 5, which deals with the Board of shareholders is an extraordinary event that is both expensive and time-consuming. The proponent requests the right to call such special meetings for any reason, at any time, and as often as such shareholders wish—a request that seems excessive and without clear benefit to other Corning shareholders. We are concerned this proposal would permit a small group to call special meetings, and have the Company and shareholders incur costs to advance a narrow group of interests, without any limitation on the number or frequency of special meetings.

Given the sizeDirectors of the Company, including the general powers of the Board, the number of directors, their term of office, their removal and over 580,000 stockholders, conveningthe Board’s authority to fill vacancies on the Board (unless such amendment, alteration or repeal has been approved by two-thirds of the entire Board). In addition, the Company’s Certificate provides that the affirmative vote of 80% of the total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote is required for certain business combination transactions with interested shareholders and to amend, alter or repeal those provisions (unless such business combination transactions or amendment, alteration or repeal has been approved by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire Board and a meetingmajority of the continuing directors). On February 1, 2012, the Board voted to approve, and recommended that the Company’s shareholders approve at the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders, isan amendment to the Company’s Certificate to delete the provisions in the Certificate that currently require a significant undertaking requiring a substantial commitmentsupermajority vote of time and financial resources. The Company must pay to prepare and distribute legal disclosure documents to over 580,000 shareholders, solicit proxies and tabulate votes.the Company’s shareholders.

Rationale for Amendment:  The Board has regularly reviewed the advantages and management must also divert time fromdisadvantages of maintaining supermajority voting requirements. In the business to prepare for and conduct the special meeting. Because of these significant administrative and financial burdens, special shareholder meetings should be exceptional and extraordinary events, to occur only if there are extremely pressing matters that must be addressed before the next regular Annual Meeting. If only 10% of Corning’s shareholders could call a special meeting,past, the Board is concernedhas concluded that small percentage will not accurately reflectkeeping the wishes of most shareholders onsupermajority voting provisions currently in the purposes, costs, burdens, and distractions of holding such special meetings.

Special meetings could be abused by special interest shareholder groups. The low 10% ownership level could subject Corning to disruption from special interest shareholder groups, who have no fiduciary duties to represent shareholders, and who have an agenda notCertificate was in the best interests of the Company or the majority ofand its shareholders. For example, hedge funds could use special meetings to disrupt Corning’s business, or to facilitate their own short-term exit strategies. Also, would-be acquirers could use special meetings to avoid negotiating with the Board in attempted takeover situations. If this proposal is implemented, any 10% shareholder group could call a special meeting in its sole discretion, in its own self-interest, at any time, for any reason.

The Board believesrecognizes that supermajority voting requirements provide several advantages. Among other things, they are intended to protect the current process allowingintegrity of boards of directors, including to ensure that directors are not removed arbitrarily, and to reduce the vulnerability of a company to hostile and potentially abusive takeover tactics by encouraging those seeking to acquire control of a company to engage with its directors to negotiate a fair transaction that maximizes value for all shareholders. However, the Board also recognizes that many investors and commentators believe that supermajority voting requirements limit a board’s accountability to shareholders and the ability of shareholders to submitparticipate in corporate governance. In this regard, the Board acknowledges the growing sentiment among shareholders in favor of eliminating such requirements.

The Board again recently considered the various positions for and against retaining the provisions currently requiring a proposalsupermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders, including the views of the Company’s shareholders, and bring a matterconcluded that amending and restating the Company’s Certificate to an Annual Meeting for a vote is the most efficient and appropriate way for shareholders to voice concerns. As a result, we do not believe adoption of this proposaldelete these provisions is in the best interests of Corning orthe Company and its shareholders.

FOR THESE REASONS, YOURProposed Amendment:  If the proposed amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate is approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s shareholders, Sections 5(f) and 6 will be eliminated in their entirety and subsequent paragraphs will be renumbered for continuity.

This description is qualified in its entirety by the actual text set forth in Appendix B, which contains the proposed amendments to the Certificate .

Shareholder Approval Required:  Because this proposal has been declared advisable by all Directors, in accordance with Sections 5(f) and 6(f) of the Company’s Certificate, the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote is required to approve the proposed amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate. If shareholders do not vote to approve the proposed amendment and restatement, the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders will remain in place.

69


If shareholders approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate as proposed, then the Company’s By-Laws will be amended to eliminate the provision that requires that any amendment, alteration or repeal of the sections of the By-laws concerning the election and term of directors, the number of directors, vacancies on the Board, the removal of directors and the general powers of the Board be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of record of outstanding shares representing 80% of voting power of all the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote (unless such amendment, alteration or repeal has been approved by two-thirds of the entire Board). The Board has approved this amendment to the By-Laws, subject to the shareholders voting to approve the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate.

Legal Effectiveness of Proposed Amendment:  If the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate is approved by the requisite vote of the shareholders, it will become effective upon the filing of an appropriate restated certificate of incorporation with the New York Department of State. The Company would make such filing promptly after the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSUNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINSTFOR PROPOSAL 5.THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REMOVE THE PROVISIONS CURRENTLY REQUIRING A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMPANY’S SHAREHOLDERS.

PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Incorporation by Reference

The Compensation Committee Report on page 4240 and the Report of Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on page 61,60, are not deemed filed with the SEC and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any prior or future filings made by Corning under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Corning specifically incorporates such information by reference. In addition, this proxy statement includes several website addresses. These website addresses are intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on these websites is not part of this proxy statement.

 

67


Additional Information

Our 20102011 Annual Report is provided with this proxy statement. Corning’s Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all other filings with the SEC, each of the Board Committee Charters and the Corporate Governance Guidelines may also be accessed via the Investor Relations page on Corning’s web site at www.corning.com. www.corning.com. These documents are also available without charge upon a shareholder’s written or oral request to Investor Relations, Corning Incorporated, One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, New York 14831, telephone number 607-974-9000.(607) 974-9000.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Denise A. Hauselt

Vice President, Secretary and Assistant General Counsel

February 24, 201123, 2012

 

6870


APPENDIX A

CORNING INCORPORATED

2012 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

1.

Purposes of the Plan

The purposes of the Plan are to (a) promote the long-term success of the Company and its Subsidiaries and to increase stockholder value by providing Eligible Individuals with incentives to contribute to the long-term growth and profitability of the Company and (b) assist the Company in attracting, retaining and motivating highly qualified individuals who are in a position to make significant contributions to the Company and its Subsidiaries.

The Plan shall become effective on May 1, 2012 upon its approval by shareholders (the “Effective Date”). If the Plan is not approved by shareholders, it shall be voidab initioand of no further force and effect.Upon the Effective Date, no further Awards will be granted under the Prior Plan.

2.

Definitions and Rules of Construction

(a)Definitions.  For purposes of the Plan, the following capitalized words shall have the meanings set forth below:

Affiliate” means any Subsidiary and any person that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company.

Award” means an Option, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Stock Appreciation Right, Performance Stock, Performance Stock Unit, Cash Performance Unit or Other Award granted by the Committee pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

Award Document” means an agreement, certificate or other type or form of document or documentation approved by the Committee that sets forth the terms and conditions of an Award. An Award Document may be in written, electronic or other media, may be limited to a notation on the books and records of the Company and, unless the Committee requires otherwise, need not be signed by a representative of the Company or a Participant.

Beneficial Owner” and “Beneficially Owned” have the meaning set forth in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.

Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company, as constituted from time to time.

“Cash Performance Unit” means a right to receive a Target Amount of cash in the future granted pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Plan.

Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the applicable rulings, regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder as amended from time to time.

Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board, any successor committee thereto or any other committee appointed from time to time by the Board to administer the Plan, which committee shall meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, the applicable rules of NYSE and all other applicable rules and regulations (in each case as amended or superseded from time to time);provided,however, that, if any Committee member is found not to have met the qualification requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code or Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, any actions taken or Awards granted by the Committee shall not be invalidated by such failure to so qualify.

A-1


Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company, par value $0.50 per share, or such other class of share or other securities as may be applicable under Section 13 of the Plan.

Company” means Corning Incorporated, a New York corporation, or any successor to all or substantially all of the Company’s business that adopts the Plan.

EBITDA” means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

EBITAmeans the Company’s earnings before interest, taxes and amortization.

Eligible Individuals” means the individuals described in Section 4(a) of the Plan who are eligible for Awards under the Plan.

Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended from time to time.

Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a Share, the fair market value thereof as of the relevant date of determination, as determined in accordance with the valuation methodology approved by the Committee. In the absence of any alternative valuation methodology approved by the Committee, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall equal the closing selling price of a Share on the date on which such valuation is made as reported on the composite tape for securities listed on NYSE.

Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision thereto.

Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option that is not intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision thereto.

NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange Euronext.

Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or Nonqualified Stock Option granted pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan.

Other Award” means any form of Award (other than an Option, Performance Stock, Performance Stock Unit, Cash Performance Unit, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit or Stock Appreciation Right) granted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan.

Participant” means an Eligible Individual who has been granted an Award under the Plan.

Performance Period” means the period established by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Document over which Performance Targets are measured.

Performance Stock” means a Target Amount of Shares granted pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Plan.

Performance Stock Unit” means a right to receive a Target Amount of Shares granted pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Plan.

Performance Target” means the performance criteria established by the Committee, from among the performance criteria provided in Section 6(f), and set forth in the applicable Award Document.

Permitted Transferees” means (i) one or more trusts established in whole or in part for the benefit of one or more of a Participant’s family members and (iii) one or more entities which are beneficially owned in whole or in part by one or more of a Participant’s family members.

A-2


Plan” means this Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended or restated from time to time.

Plan Limit” means the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued for all purposes under the Plan as set forth in Section 5(a) of the Plan.

Prior Plan” means the Corning Incorporated 2005 Employee Equity Participation Program, as amended from time to time.

Restricted Stock” means one or more Shares granted or sold pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Plan.

Restricted Stock Unit” means a right to receive one or more Shares (or cash, if applicable) in the future granted pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Plan.

Shares” means shares of Common Stock, as may be adjusted pursuant to Section 13(b).

Stock Appreciation Right” means a right to receive all or some portion of the appreciation on Shares granted pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan.

Subsidiary” means any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity of which 50% or more of the outstanding voting equity securities or voting power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by the Company. For purposes of determining eligibility for the grant of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan, the term “Subsidiary” shall be defined in the manner required by Section 424(f) of the Code.

Substitute Award” means any Award granted upon assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, outstanding employee equity awards previously granted by a company or other entity acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines pursuant to the terms of an equity compensation plan that was approved by the stockholders of such company or other entity.

Target Amount” means the target number of Shares or target cash value established by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Document.

(b)Rules of Construction.    The masculine pronoun shall be deemed to include the feminine pronoun, and the singular form of a word shall be deemed to include the plural form, unless the context requires otherwise. Unless the text indicates otherwise, references to sections are to sections of the Plan.

3.

Administration

(a) Committee.    The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall have full power and authority, subject to the express provisions hereof, to:

(i) select the Participants from the Eligible Individuals;

(ii) grant Awards in accordance with the Plan;

(iii) determine the number of Shares subject to each Award or the cash amount payable in connection with an Award;

A-3


(iv) determine the terms and conditions of each Award, including, without limitation, those related to term, permissible methods of exercise, vesting, cancellation, payment, settlement, exercisability, Performance Periods, Performance Targets, and the effect, if any, of a Participant’s termination of employment with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, subject to Section 6(c), a Change of Control of the Company;

(v) subject to Sections 15 and 16(f) of the Plan, amend the terms and conditions of an Award after the granting thereof;

(vi) specify and approve the provisions of the Award Documents delivered to Participants in connection with their Awards;

(vii) construe and interpret any Award Document delivered under the Plan;

(viii) make factual determinations in connection with the administration or interpretation of the Plan;

(ix)  adopt, prescribe, amend, waive and rescind administrative regulations, rules and procedures relating to the Plan;

(x) employ such legal counsel, independent auditors and consultants as it deems desirable for the administration of the Plan and to rely upon any advice, opinion or computation received therefrom;

(xi) vary the terms of Awards to take into account tax and securities laws (or change thereto) and other regulatory requirements or to procure favorable tax treatment for Participants;

(xii) correct any defects, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in any Award Document or the Plan; and

(xiii) make all other determinations and take any other action desirable or necessary to interpret, construe or implement properly the provisions of the Plan or any Award Document.

(b)Plan Construction and Interpretation. The Committee shall have full power and authority, subject to the express provisions hereof, to construe and interpret the Plan.

(c)Prohibited Actions.  Notwithstanding the authority granted to the Committee pursuant to Section 3(a) and 3(b), the Committee shallnot have the authority, without obtaining shareholder approval, to (i) reprice or cancel Options and Stock Appreciation Rights in violation of Section 6(g), (ii) amend Section 5 to increase the Plan Limit or any of the special limits listed therein or (iii) grant Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with an exercise price that is less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant in violation of Section 6(j).

(d)Determinations of Committee Final and Binding.  All determinations by the Committee in carrying out and administering the Plan and in construing and interpreting the Plan shall be made in the Committee’s sole discretion and shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes and upon all persons interested herein.

(e)Delegation of Authority.  To the extent not prohibited by applicable laws, rules and regulations, the Committee may, from time to time, delegate some or all of its authority under the Plan to a subcommittee or subcommittees thereof or other persons or groups of persons as it deems necessary, appropriate or advisable under such conditions or limitations as it may set at the time of such delegation or thereafter;provided,however, that the Committee may not delegate its authority (i) to make Awards to employees (A) who

A-4


are subject on the date of the Award to the reporting rules under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, (B) whose compensation for such fiscal year may be subject to the limit on deductible compensation pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code or (C) who are officers of the Company, or (ii) pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan. For purposes of the Plan, reference to the Committee shall be deemed to refer to any subcommittee, subcommittees, or other persons or groups of persons to whom the Committee delegates authority pursuant to this Section 3(e).

(f)Liability of Committee.  Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations: (i) no member of the Board or Committee (or its delegates) shall be liable for any good faith action, omission or determination made in connection with the operation, administration or interpretation of the Plan and (ii) the members of the Board or the Committee (and its delegates) shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement in the manner provided in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation as it may be amended from time to time. In the performance of its responsibilities with respect to the Plan, the Committee shall be entitled to rely upon information and/or advice furnished by the Company’s officers or employees, the Company’s accountants, the Company’s counsel and any other party the Committee deems necessary, and no member of the Committee shall be liable for any action taken or not taken in reliance upon any such information and/or advice.

(g)Action by the Board.  Anything in the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations, any authority or responsibility that, under the terms of the Plan, may be exercised by the Committee may alternatively be exercised by the Board.

4.

Eligibility

(a)Eligible Individuals.  Awards may be granted to officers and employees of the Company or any of its Affiliates. The Committee shall have the authority to select the persons to whom Awards may be granted and to determine the type, number and terms of Awards to be granted to each such Participant.

(b)Grants to Participants.  The Committee shall have no obligation to grant any Eligible Individual an Award or to designate an Eligible Individual as a Participant solely by reason of such Eligible Individual having received a prior Award or having been previously designated as a Participant. The Committee may grant more than one Award to a Participant and may designate an Eligible Individual as a Participant for overlapping periods of time.

5.

Shares Subject to the Plan

(a)Plan Limit.  Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 13 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued for all purposes under the Plan shall be eighty-five million (85,000,000). Shares to be issued under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares, issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company (in the open-market or in private transactions) and that are being held in treasury, or a combination thereof. All of the Shares subject to the Plan Limit may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options.

(b)Rules Applicable to Determining Shares Available for Issuance.  The number of Shares remaining available for issuance will be reduced by the number of Shares subject to outstanding Awards and, for Awards that are not denominated by Shares, by the number of Shares actually delivered upon settlement or payment of the Award. For purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, (i) the number of Shares that are tendered by a Participant or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of an Award or to satisfy the Participant’s tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise or settlement of an Award, (ii) all of the Shares covered by a stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right to the extent exercised, and (iii) any Shares that are forfeited or cancelled or otherwise expire for any reason without having been exercised or settled under the Prior Plan willnot be added back to the Plan Limit. In addition, for purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the

A-5


number of Shares corresponding to Awards under the Plan that are forfeited or cancelled or otherwise expire for any reason without having been exercised or settled or that is settled through issuance of consideration other than Shares (including, without limitation, cash) shall be added back to the Plan Limit and again be available for the grant of Awards.

(c)Special Limits.  Anything to the contrary in Section 5(a) above notwithstanding, but subject to adjustment under Section 13 of the Plan, the following special limits shall apply to Shares available for Awards under the Plan:

(i) the maximum number of Shares that may be subject to Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted to any Eligible Individual in any calendar year shall equal one million five-hundred thousand (1,500,000) Shares; and

(ii) the maximum amount of Awards (other than those Awards set forth in Section(i)) that may be awarded to any Eligible Individual in any calendar year is fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) measured as of the date of grant (with respect to Awards denominated in cash) or one million five-hundred thousand (1,500,000) Shares (less any Shares subject to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted to the Eligible Individual in the relevant calendar year) measured as of the date of grant (with respect to Awards denominated in Shares).

(d) Any Shares underlying Substitute Awards shall not be counted against the number of Shares remaining for issuance and shall not be subject to Section 5(c).

6.

Awards in General

(a)Types of Awards; Exercise.  Awards under the Plan may consist of Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Stock, Performance Stock Units, Cash Performance Units and Other Awards. Any Award described in Sections 7 through 11 of the Plan may be granted singly or in combination or tandem with any other Award, as the Committee may determine. Subject to Section 6(g), Awards under the Plan may be made in combination with, in replacement of, or as alternatives to awards or rights under any other compensation or benefit plan of the Company, including the plan of any acquired entity. Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Document, the Committee shall determine the permissible methods of exercise for any Award.

(b)Terms Set Forth in Award Document.  The terms and conditions of each Award shall be set forth in an Award Document in a form approved by the Committee for such Award, which Award Document shall contain terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations, the Committee may at any time following grant (i) accelerate the vesting, exercisability, lapse of restrictions, settlement or payment of any Award, (ii) eliminate the restrictions and conditions applicable to an Award or (iii) extend the post-termination exercise period of an outstanding Award. The terms of Awards may vary among Participants, and the Plan does not impose upon the Committee any requirement to make Awards subject to uniform terms. Accordingly, the terms of individual Award Documents may vary.

(c)Termination of Employment and Change in Control.  The Committee shall specify at or after the time of grant of an Award the provisions governing the disposition of an Award in the event of a Participant’s termination of employment, with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or the Participant’s death or disability. Similarly, the Committee shall have full authority to determine the effect, if any, of a change in control of the Company on an Award, which effect may be specified in the applicable Award Document or determined at a subsequent time.

(d)Dividends and Dividend Equivalents.  The Committee may provide Participants with the right to receive dividends or payments equivalent to dividends or interest with respect to an outstanding Award, which payments can either be paid currently or deemed to have been reinvested in Shares, and can be made in

A-6


Shares, cash or a combination thereof, as the Committee shall determine;provided,however, that (i) no payments of dividend equivalents may be made unless and until the related Award is earned and vested and (ii) the terms of any reinvestment of dividends must comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no dividends or dividend equivalents shall be paid with respect to Cash Performance Units, Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.

(e)Rights of a Stockholder.  A Participant shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by an Award (including voting rights) until the date the Participant or his nominee becomes the holder of record of such Shares. No adjustment shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to such date, except as provided in Section 13.

(f)Performance-Based Awards.  (i) The Committee may determine whether any Award under the Plan is intended to be “performance-based compensation” as that term is used in Section 162(m) of the Code. Any such Awards designated to be “performance-based compensation” shall be conditioned on the achievement of one or more Performance Targets to the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code and will be subject to all other conditions and requirements of Section 162(m). The Performance Targets may include one or more of the following performance criteria:

net income; cash flow or cash flow on investment; operating cash flow; pre-tax or post-tax profit levels or earnings; profit in excess of cost of capital; operating earnings; return on investment; free cash flow; free cash flow per share; earnings per share; return on assets; return on net assets; return on equity; return on capital; return on invested capital; return on sales; sales growth; growth in managed assets; operating margin; operating income; total stockholder return or stock price appreciation; EBITDA; EBITA; revenue; net revenues; market share, market penetration; productivity improvements; inventory turnover measurements; reduction of losses, loss ratios or expense ratios; reduction in fixed costs; operating cost management; cost of capital; and debt reduction.

(ii) The Performance Targets shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (subject to adjustments and modifications approved by the Committee in advance) consistently applied on a business unit, divisional, subsidiary or consolidated basis or any combination thereof.

(iii) The Performance Targets may be described in terms of objectives that are related to the individual Participant or objectives that are Company-wide or related to a Subsidiary, business unit, or region and may be measured on an absolute or cumulative basis or on the basis of percentage of improvement over time, and may be measured in terms of Company performance (or performance of the applicable Subsidiary, business unit, or region) or measured relative to selected peer companies or a market index. At the time of grant, the Committee may provide for adjustments to the performance criteria in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code.

(iv) The Participants will be designated, and the applicable Performance Targets will be established, by the Committee within ninety (90) days following the commencement of the applicable Performance Period (or such earlier or later date permitted or required by Section 162(m) of the Code). Each Participant will be assigned a Target Amount payable if Performance Targets are achieved. Any payment of an Award granted with Performance Targets shall be conditioned on the written certification of the Committee in each case that the Performance Targets and any other material conditions were satisfied. The Committee may determine, at the time of Award grant, that if performance exceeds the specified Performance Targets, the Award may be settled with payment greater than the Target Amount, but in no event may such payment exceed the limits set forth in Section 5(c). The Committee retains the right to reduce any Award notwithstanding the attainment of the Performance Targets.

(v) The Committee may also grant Awards not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. With respect to such Awards, the Committee may establish Performance Targets based on any criteria as it deems appropriate.

A-7


(g)Repricing of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.  Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, or exchange of Shares), the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended, without stockholder approval, to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, or to cancel outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for (i) cash or other property, (ii) Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or (iii) other Awards.

(h)Recoupment.  Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, all Awards granted under the Plan, any payments made under the Plan and any gains realized upon exercise or settlement of an Award shall be subject to claw-back or recoupment as permitted or mandated by applicable law, rules, regulations or Company policy as enacted, adopted or modified from time to time.

(i)Minimum Vesting Period.  At the time of grant of an Award the Committee shall, in its discretion, establish a vesting period for the Award; provided, however, that, (i) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units granted to Eligible Individuals (other than performance-based Awards) shall vest no more frequently than pro rata over a period of 3 years and (ii) performance-based awards (including Performance Stock, Performance Stock Units and Cash Performance Units) shall have a minimum vesting period of one year.

(j)Minimum Grant or Exercise Price.  In no event shall the exercise price per Share of an Option or the grant price per Share of a Stock Appreciation Right be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant; provided, however that the exercise price of a Substitute Award granted as an Option shall be determined in accordance with Section 409A of the Code and may be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value.

(k)Term of Options and SARs.  An Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be effective for such term as shall be determined by the Committee and as set forth in the Award Document relating to such Award. The Committee may extend the term of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right after the time of grant;provided,however, that the term of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right may in no event extend beyond the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of grant of such Award.

7.

Terms and Conditions of Options

(a)General.  The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Options to Eligible Individuals and shall determine whether such Options shall be Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options. Each Option shall be evidenced by an Award Document that shall expressly identify the Option as an Incentive Stock Option or Nonqualified Stock Option, and be in such form and contain such provisions as the Committee shall from time to time deem appropriate.

(b)Payment of Exercise Price.  Subject to the provisions of the applicable Award Document, the exercise price of an Option may be paid (i) in cash or cash equivalents, (ii) by actual delivery or attestation to ownership of freely transferable Shares already owned by the person exercising the Option, (iii) by a combination of cash and Shares equal in value to the exercise price, (iv) through net share settlement or similar procedure involving the withholding of Shares subject to the Option with a value equal to the exercise price or (v) by such other means as the Committee may authorize. In accordance with the rules and procedures authorized by the Committee for this purpose, the Option may also be exercised through a “cashless exercise” procedure authorized by the Committee from time to time that permits Participants to exercise Options by delivering irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Company the amount of sale or loan proceeds necessary to pay the exercise price and the amount of any required tax or other withholding obligations or such other procedures determined by the Company from time to time.

A-8


(c)Incentive Stock Options.  The exercise price per Share of an Incentive Stock Option shall be fixed by the Committee at the time of grant or shall be determined by a method specified by the Committee at the time of grant, but in no event shall the exercise price of an Incentive Stock Option be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. No Incentive Stock Option may be issued pursuant to the Plan to any individual who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, unless (i) the exercise price determined as of the date of grant is at least one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant of the Shares subject to such Incentive Stock Option and (ii) the Incentive Stock Option is not exercisable more than five (5) years from the date of grant thereof. No Participant shall be granted any Incentive Stock Option which would result in such Participant receiving a grant of Incentive Stock Options that would have an aggregate Fair Market Value in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), determined as of the time of grant, that would be exercisable for the first time by such Participant during any calendar year. No Incentive Stock Option may be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. The terms of any Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, as amended from time to time.

8.

Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

(a)Restricted Stock.  The Committee, in its discretion, may grant or sell Restricted Stock to Eligible Individuals. An Award of Restricted Stock shall consist of one or more Shares granted or sold to an Eligible Individual, and shall be subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and established by the Committee in connection with the Award and specified in the applicable Award Document. Restricted Stock may, among other things, be subject to restrictions on transferability, vesting requirements or other specified circumstances under which it may be canceled.

(b)Restricted Stock Units.  The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Restricted Stock Units to Eligible Individuals. A Restricted Stock Unit shall entitle a Participant to receive, subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and the applicable Award Document, one or more Shares. Restricted Stock Units may, among other things, be subject to restrictions on transferability, vesting requirements or other specified circumstances under which they may be canceled. If and when the cancellation provisions lapse, the Restricted Stock Units shall become Shares owned by the applicable Participant or, at the sole discretion of the Committee, cash, or a combination of cash and Shares, with a value equal to the Fair Market Value of the Shares at the time of payment.

9.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Stock Appreciation Rights to Eligible Individuals. Each Stock Appreciation Right shall be subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and established by the Committee in connection with the Award and specified in the applicable Award Document. A Stock Appreciation Right shall entitle a Participant to receive, upon satisfaction of the conditions to payment specified in the applicable Award Document, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the exercise date of the number of Shares for which the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised over the per Share grant price for such Stock Appreciation Right specified in the applicable Award Document. Payments to a Participant upon exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right may be made in cash or Shares.

10.

Terms and Conditions of Performance Stock, Performance Stock Units and Cash Performance Units

(a)Performance Stock or Performance Stock Units.  The Committee may grant Performance Stock or Performance Stock Units to Eligible Individuals. An Award of Performance Stock or Performance Stock Units shall consist of, or represent a right to receive, a Target Amount of Shares granted to an Eligible Individual

A-9


based on the achievement of Performance Targets over the applicable Performance Period, and shall be subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and established by the Committee in connection with the Award and specified in the applicable Award Document.

(b)Cash Performance Units.  The Committee, in its discretion, may grant Cash Performance Units to Eligible Individuals. A Performance Unit shall entitle a Participant to receive, subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Plan and established by the Committee in connection with the Award and specified in the applicable Award Document, a Target Amount of cash based upon the achievement of Performance Targets over the applicable Performance Period.

11.

Other Awards

The Committee shall have the authority to specify the terms and provisions of other forms of equity-based or equity-related Awards not described above that the Committee determines to be consistent with the purpose of the Plan and the interests of the Company, which Awards may provide for cash payments based in whole or in part on the value or future value of Shares, for the acquisition or future acquisition of Shares, or any combination thereof.

12.

Certain Restrictions

(a)Transfers.  No Award shall be transferable other than pursuant to a beneficiary designation approved by the Company, by last will and testament or by the laws of descent and distribution or, except in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, pursuant to a domestic relations order, as the case may be;provided, however, that the Committee may, subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations and such terms and conditions as it shall specify, permit the transfer of an Award, other than an Incentive Stock Option, for no consideration to a Permitted Transferee. Any Award transferred to a Permitted Transferee shall be further transferable only by last will and testament or the laws of descent and distribution or, for no consideration, to another Permitted Transferee of the Participant.

(b)Award Exercisable Only by Participant.  During the lifetime of a Participant, an Award shall be exercisable only by the Participant or by a Permitted Transferee to whom such Award has been transferred in accordance with Section 12(a) above. The grant of an Award shall impose no obligation on a Participant to exercise or settle the Award.

13.

Recapitalization or Reorganization

(a)Authority of the Company and Stockholders.  The existence of the Plan, the Award Documents and the Awards granted hereunder shall not affect or restrict in any way the right or power of the Company or the stockholders of the Company to make or authorize any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in the Company’s capital structure or business, any merger or consolidation of the Company, any issue of stock or of options, warrants or rights to purchase stock or of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stocks whose rights are superior to or affect the Shares or the rights thereof or which are convertible into or exchangeable for Shares, or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or proceeding, whether of a similar character or otherwise.

(b)Change in Capitalization.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or any Award Document, the number and kind of Shares authorized for issuance under Section 5 of the Plan, including the maximum number of Shares available under the special limits provided for in Section 5(c), shall be equitably adjusted in the manner deemed necessary by the Committee in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, partial or complete liquidation, reclassification, merger, consolidation, separation, extraordinary cash dividend, split-up, spin-off, combination, exchange of Shares, warrants or rights

A-10


offering to purchase Shares at a price substantially below Fair Market Value, or any other corporate event or distribution of stock or property of the Company affecting the Shares in order to preserve, but not increase, the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan. In addition, upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events, the number and kind of Shares subject to any outstanding Award and the exercise price per Share (or the grant price per Share, as the case may be), if any, under any outstanding Award shall be equitably adjusted in the manner deemed necessary by the Committee (including by payment of cash to a Participant) in order to preserve the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available to Participants. Such adjustments shall be made by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, such adjusted Awards shall be subject to the same restrictions and vesting or settlement schedule to which the underlying Award is subject.

14.

Term of the Plan

Unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 15, the Plan shall terminate on the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date, except with respect to Awards then outstanding. No Awards may be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date.

15.

Amendment and Termination

Subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations, the Board may at any time terminate or, from time to time, amend, modify or suspend the Plan;provided,however, that no termination, amendment, modification or suspension (i) will be effective without the approval of the stockholders of the Company if such approval is required under applicable laws, rules and regulations, including the rules of NYSE, and (ii) shall materially and adversely alter or impair the rights of a Participant in any Award previously made under the Plan without the consent of the holder thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board shall have broad authority to amend the Plan or any Award under the Plan without the consent of a Participant to the extent it deems necessary or desirable (a) to comply with, or take into account changes in, or interpretations of, applicable tax laws, securities laws, employment laws, accounting rules and other applicable laws, rules and regulations, (b) to take into account unusual or nonrecurring events or market conditions (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 13(b), or (c) to take into account significant acquisitions or dispositions of assets or other property by the Company.

16.

Miscellaneous

(a)Tax Withholding.  The Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, may require any individual entitled to receive a payment of an Award to remit to the Company, prior to payment, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable tax withholding requirements. In the case of an Award payable in Shares, the Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, may permit or require a Participant to satisfy, in whole or in part, such obligation to remit taxes by directing the Company to withhold shares that would otherwise be received by such individual or to repurchase shares that were issued to the Participant to satisfy the minimum statutory withholding rates for any applicable tax withholding purposes, in accordance with all applicable laws and pursuant to such rules as the Committee may establish from time to time. The Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, shall also have the right to deduct from all cash payments made to a Participant (whether or not such payment is made in connection with an Award) any applicable taxes required to be withheld with respect to such payments.

(b) No Right to Awards or Employment.  No person shall have any claim or right to receive Awards under the Plan. Neither the Plan, the grant of Awards under the Plan nor any action taken or omitted to be taken under the Plan shall be deemed to create or confer on any Eligible Individual any right to be retained in the employ of the Company or any Affiliate thereof, or to interfere with or to limit in any way the right of the Company or other Affiliate thereof to terminate the employment of such Eligible Individual at any time. No Award shall constitute salary, recurrent compensation or contractual compensation for the year of grant, any later

A-11


year or any other period of time. Payments received by a Participant under any Award made pursuant to the Plan shall not be included in, nor have any effect on, the determination of employment-related rights or benefits under any other employee benefit plan or similar arrangement provided by the Company and its Affiliates, unless otherwise specifically provided for under the terms of such plan or arrangement or by the Committee.

(c)Securities Law Restrictions.  An Award may not be exercised or settled, and no Shares may be issued in connection with an Award, unless the issuance of such shares (i) has been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (ii) has qualified under applicable state “blue sky” laws (or the Company has determined that an exemption from registration and from qualification under such state “blue sky” laws is available) and (iii) complies with all applicable foreign securities laws. The Committee may require each Participant purchasing or acquiring Shares pursuant to an Award under the Plan to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that such Eligible Individual is acquiring the Shares for investment purposes and not with a view to the distribution thereof. All certificates for Shares delivered under the Plan shall be subject to such stock-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any exchange upon which the Shares are then listed, and any applicable securities law, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

(d)Section 162(m) of the Code.  The Plan is intended to comply in all respects with Section 162(m) of the Code; provided, however, that in the event the Committee determines that compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code is not desired with respect to a particular Award, compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code will not be required. In addition, if any provision of this Plan would cause Awards that are intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, to fail to so qualify, that provision shall be severed from, and shall be deemed not to be a part of, the Plan, but the other provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect.

(e)Section 16 of the Exchange Act.  Notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan or any Award Document under the Plan to the contrary, if the consummation of any transaction under the Plan, or the taking of any action by the Committee in connection with a change in control of the Company, would result in the possible imposition of liability on a Participant pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, the Committee shall have the right, in its discretion, but shall not be obligated, to defer such transaction or the effectiveness of such action to the extent necessary to avoid such liability, but in no event for a period longer than 180 days.

(f)Section 409A of the Code.  Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan or an Award Document, if any provision of the Plan or an Award Document contravenes any regulations or guidance promulgated under Section 409A of the Code or would cause an Award to be subject to additional taxes, accelerated taxation, interest and/or penalties under Section 409A of the Code, such provision of the Plan or Award Document may be modified by the Committee without consent of the Participant in any manner the Committee deems reasonable or necessary. In making such modifications the Committee shall attempt, but shall not be obligated, to maintain, to the maximum extent practicable, the original intent of the applicable provision without contravening the provisions of Section 409A of the Code. Moreover, any discretionary authority that the Committee may have pursuant to the Plan shall not be applicable to an Award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code to the extent such discretionary authority would contravene Section 409A of the Code.

(g)Awards to Individuals Subject to Laws of a Jurisdiction Outside of the United States.  To the extent that Awards under the Plan are awarded to Eligible Individuals who are domiciled or resident outside of the United States or to persons who are domiciled or resident in the United States but who are subject to the tax laws of a jurisdiction outside of the United States, the Committee may adjust the terms of the Awards granted hereunder to such person (i) to comply with the laws, rules and regulations of such jurisdiction and (ii) to permit the grant of the Award not to be a taxable event to the Participant. The authority granted under the previous sentence shall include the discretion for the Committee to adopt, on behalf of the Company, one or more sub-plans applicable to separate classes of Eligible Individuals who are subject to the laws of jurisdictions outside of the United States.

A-12


(h)No Limitation on Corporate Actions.  Nothing contained in the Plan shall be construed to prevent the Company or any Subsidiary from taking any corporate action, whether or not such action would have an adverse effect on any Awards made under the Plan. No Participant, beneficiary or other person shall have any claim against the Company or any Subsidiary as a result of any such action.

(i)Unfunded Plan.  The Plan is intended to constitute an unfunded plan for incentive compensation. Prior to the issuance of Shares, cash or other form of payment in connection with an Award, nothing contained herein shall give any Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general unsecured creditor of the Company.

(j)Successors.  All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

(k)Award Document.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the Plan and any Award Document, the Plan shall govern and the Award Document shall be interpreted to minimize or eliminate any such conflict or inconsistency.

(l)Headings.  The headings of Sections herein are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning of any of the provisions of the Plan.

(m)Severability.  If any provision of this Plan is held unenforceable, the remainder of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without regard to such unenforceable provision and shall be applied as though the unenforceable provision were not contained in the Plan.

(n)Governing Law.  Except as to matters of federal law, the Plan and all actions taken thereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

A-13


APPENDIX B

PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT TO

CORNING INCORPORATED’S

RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

Below are sections that currently appear in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which are proposed to be amended:

Art. 5 Current Version

(f) The affirmative vote of the holders of record of outstanding shares representing at least eighty percent (80%) of the voting power of all the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors shall be required to amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision or provisions inconsistent with, any provision of this paragraph 5 including this paragraph (f); provided, however, that this paragraph (f) shall not apply to, and such eighty percent (80%) vote shall not be required for, any amendment, alteration, repeal, or adoption of any inconsistent provision or provisions, declared advisable by the Board of Directors by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire Board of Directors.

Art. 6 Current Version

(a)Certain Definitions.

For the purposes of this paragraph 6:

(i) “Business Combination” shall mean:

(A) any merger or consolidation of the Corporation or any Subsidiary with (1) an Interested Stockholder or (2) any other corporation (whether or not itself an Interested Stockholder) which is, or after such merger or consolidation would be, an Affiliate or Associate of an Interested Stockholder; or

(B) any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions) to or with an Interested Stockholder or an Affiliate or Associate of an Interested Stockholder of any assets of the Corporation or any Subsidiary having an aggregate Fair Market Value of $20,000,000 or more; or

(C) the issuance or transfer by the Corporation or any Subsidiary (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of any securities of the Corporation or any Subsidiary to an Interested Stockholder or an Affiliate or Associate of an Interested Stockholder in exchange for cash, securities or other property (or a combination thereof) having an aggregate Fair Market Value of $20,000,000 or more; or

(D) the adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Corporation proposed by or on behalf of an Interested Stockholder or an Affiliate or Associate of an Interested Stockholder; or

(E) any reclassification of securities (including any reverse stock split), or recapitalization of the Corporation, or any merger or consolidation of the Corporation with any Subsidiary or any other transaction (whether or not with or into or otherwise involving an Interested Stockholder) which has the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the percentage of the outstanding shares of (1) any class of equity securities of the Corporation or any Subsidiary or (2) any class of securities of the Corporation or any Subsidiary convertible into equity securities of the Corporation or any Subsidiary, represented by securities of such class which are directly or indirectly owned by an Interested Stockholder and all of its Affiliates and Associates; or

B-1


(F) any agreement, contract or other arrangement providing for any one or more of the actions specified in clauses (A) through (E) of this paragraph 6(a)(i).

(ii) “Affiliate” or “Associate” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as in effect on January 1, 1985.

(iii) “Beneficial Owner” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, as in effect on January 1, 1985.

(iv)“Continuing Director” shall mean (A) any member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation who (1) is neither the Interested Stockholder involved in the Business Combination as to which a vote of Continuing Directors is provided hereunder, nor an Affiliate, Associate, employee, agent or nominee of such Interested Stockholder, or the relative of any of the foregoing, and (2) was a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation prior to the time that such Interested Stockholder became an Interested Stockholder, (B) any successor of a Continuing Director described in clause (A) who is recommended or elected to succeed a Continuing Director by the affirmative vote of a majority of Continuing Directors then on the Board of Directors of the Corporation, and (C) any person who is elected to the Board of Directors of the Corporation at the 1985 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any successor thereto who is recommended or elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Continuing Directors then on the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

(v) “Fair Market Value” shall mean: (A) in the case of stock, the highest closing sale price during the 30-day period immediately preceding the date in question of a share of such stock on the Composite Tape for the New York Stock Exchange–Listed Stocks, or, if such stock is not reported on the Composite Tape, on the New York Stock Exchange, or, if such stock is not listed on such Exchange, on the principal United States securities exchange registered under the Exchange Act on which such stock is listed, or, if such stock is not listed on any such exchange, the highest closing bid quotation with respect to a share of such stock during the 30-day period preceding the date in question on the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Automated Quotations System or any similar inter-dealer quotation system then in use, or if no such quotation is available, the fair market value on the date in question of a share of such stock as determined by a majority of the Continuing Directors in good faith; and (B) in the case of property other than cash or stock, the fair market value of such property on the date in question as determined by a majority of the Continuing Directors in good faith.

(vi)“Interested Stockholder” shall mean any Person (other than the Corporation or any Subsidiary) who or which:

(A) is, or was at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, the Beneficial Owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock of the Corporation; or

(B) is an assignee of, or has otherwise succeeded to, any shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation of which an Interested Stockholder was the Beneficial Owner at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, if such assignment or succession shall have occurred in the course of a transaction, or series of transactions, not involving a public offering within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

For the purpose of determining whether a Person is an Interested Stockholder, the outstanding Voting Stock of the Corporation shall include unissued shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation of which the Interested Stockholder is the Beneficial Owner but shall not include any other shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation which may be issuable pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, warrants or options, or otherwise, to any Person who is not the Interested Stockholder.

B-2


(vii) A “Person” shall mean any individual, partnership, firm, corporation, association, trust, unincorporated organization or other entity, as well as any syndicate or group deemed to be a person under Section 14(d) (2) of the Exchange Act.

(viii) “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation of which the Corporation owns, directly or indirectly, (i) a majority of the outstanding shares of equity securities of such corporation, or (ii) shares having a majority of the voting power represented by all of the outstanding shares of Voting Stock of such corporation. For the purpose of determining whether a corporation is a Subsidiary, the outstanding Voting Stock and shares of equity securities thereof shall include unissued shares of which the Corporation is the Beneficial Owner but, except for the purposes of paragraph 6(a)(vi), shall not include any other shares which may be issuable pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, warrants or options, or otherwise, to any Person who is not the Corporation.

(ix)“Voting Stock” shall mean outstanding shares of capital stock of the relevant corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.

(b) Higher Vote for Business Combinations.

In addition to any affirmative vote required by law or by this Certificate of Incorporation, and except as otherwise expressly provided in paragraph 6(c), any Business Combination shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of record of outstanding shares representing at least eighty percent (80%) of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation, voting together as a single class, it being understood that, for purposes of this paragraph 6, each share of the Voting Stock of the Corporation shall have the number of votes granted to it pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Certificate of Incorporation. Such affirmative vote shall be required notwithstanding the fact that no vote may be required, or that a lesser percentage may be specified, by law or in any agreement with any national securities exchange or otherwise.

(c) When Higher Vote is Not Required.

The provisions paragraph 6(b) shall not be applicable to any particular Business Combination, and such Business Combination shall require only such affirmative vote, if any, of the stockholders as is required by law and any other provision of this Certificate of Incorporation, if the conditions specified in either of the following paragraphs (i) and (ii) are met:

(i) Approval by Continuing Directors. The Business Combination shall have been approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Continuing Directors, even if the Continuing Directors do not constitute a quorum of the entire Board of Directors.

(ii) Form of Consideration, Price and Procedure Requirements. All of the following conditions shall have been met:

(A) With respect to each share of each class of Voting Stock of the Corporation (including Common Stock), the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive on or before the date of the consummation of the Business Combination (the “Consummation Date”), consideration, in the form specified in paragraph 6(c)(ii) hereof, with an aggregate Fair Market Value as of the Consummation Date at least equal to the highest of the following:

(1) the highest per share price (including any brokerage commissions, transfer taxes and soliciting dealers’ fees) paid by the Interested Stockholder to which the Business Combination relates, or by any Affiliate or Associate of such Interested Stockholder, for any shares of such class of Voting Stock acquired by it (a) within the two-year period immediately prior to the first public announcement of the proposal of the Business Combination (the “Announcement Date”) or (b) in the transaction in which it became an Interested Stockholder, whichever is higher;

B-3


(2) the Fair Market Value per share of such class of Voting Stock of the Corporation on the Announcement Date; and

(3) the highest preferential amount per share, if any, to which the holders of shares of such class of Voting Stock of the Corporation are entitled in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Corporation.

(B) The consideration to be received by holders of a particular class of outstanding Voting Stock of the Corporation (including Common Stock) as described in paragraph 6(c)(ii) hereof shall be in cash or if the consideration previously paid by or on behalf of the Interested Stockholder in connection with its acquisition of beneficial ownership of shares of such class of Voting Stock consisted in whole or in part of consideration other than cash, then in the same form as such consideration. If such payment for shares of any class of Voting Stock of the Corporation has been made with varying forms of consideration, the form of consideration for such class of Voting Stock shall be either cash or the form used to acquire the beneficial ownership of the largest number of shares of such class of Voting Stock previously acquired by the Interested Stockholder.

(C) After such Interested Stockholder has become an Interested Stockholder and prior to the Consummation Date of such Business Combination: (1) except as approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Continuing Directors, there shall have been no failure to declare and pay at the regular date therefor any full quarterly dividends (whether or not cumulative) on the outstanding preferred stock of the Corporation, if any; (2) there shall have been (a) no reduction in the annual rate of dividends paid on the Common Stock of the Corporation (except as necessary to reflect any subdivision of the Common Stock ) except as approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Continuing Directors, and (b) an increase in such annual rate of dividends as necessary to reflect any reclassification (including any reverse stock split), recapitalization, reorganization or any similar transaction which has the effect of reducing the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock, unless the failure so to increase such annual rate is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Continuing Directors; and (3) such Interested Stockholder shall not have become the Beneficial Owner of any additional shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation except as part of the transaction which results in such an Interested Stockholder becoming an Interested Stockholder.

(D) After such Interested Stockholder has become an Interested Stockholder, such Interested Stockholder shall not have received the benefit, directly or indirectly (except proportionately as a stockholder of the Corporation), of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial assistance or any tax credits or other tax advantages provided by the Corporation.

(E) A proxy or information statement describing the proposed Business Combination and complying with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the General Rules and Regulations thereunder (or any subsequent provisions replacing such Act, rules or regulations) shall be mailed to the stockholders of the Corporation at least 45 days prior to the consummation of such Business Combination (whether or not such proxy or information statement is required to be mailed pursuant to such Act or subsequent provisions thereof).

(d) Powers of Continuing Directors.

A majority of the Continuing Directors shall have the power and duty to determine, on the basis of information known to them after reasonable inquiry, all facts necessary to determine compliance with this paragraph 6, including, without limitation, (i) whether a person is an Interested Stockholder, (ii) the number of shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation beneficially owned by any person, (iii) whether a person is an Affiliate

B-4


or Associate of another, (iv) whether the requirements of paragraph 6(c)(ii) have been met with respect to any Business Combination, and (v) whether the assets which are the subject of any Business Combination have, or the consideration to be received for the issuance or transfer of securities by the Corporation or any Subsidiary in any Business Combination has, an aggregate Fair Market Value of $20,000,000 or more; and the good faith determination of a majority of the Continuing Directors on such matters shall be conclusive and binding for all the purposes of this paragraph 6.

(e) No Effect on Fiduciary Obligations.

(i) Nothing contained in this paragraph 6 shall be construed to relieve the members of the Board of Directors or an Interested Stockholder from any fiduciary obligation imposed by law.

(ii) The fact that any Business Combination complies with the provisions of paragraph 6(c) shall not be construed to impose any fiduciary duty, obligation or responsibility on the Board of Directors, or any member thereof, to approve such Business Combination or recommend its adoption or approval to the stockholders of the Corporation, nor shall such compliance limit, prohibit or otherwise restrict in any manner the Board of Directors, or any member thereof, with respect to evaluations of or actions and responses taken with respect to such Business Combination.

(f) Amendment or Repeal.

The affirmative vote of the holders of record of outstanding shares representing at least eighty percent (80%) of the voting power of all the outstanding Voting Stock of the Corporation shall be required to amend, alter or repeal, or adopt any provision or provisions inconsistent with, any provision of this paragraph 6;provided,however, that this paragraph 6(f) shall not apply to, and such eighty percent (80%) vote shall not be required for, any amendment, alteration, repeal or adoption of any inconsistent provision or provisions, declared advisable by the Board of Directors by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire Board of Directors and a majority of the Continuing Directors.

Art. 7 Current Version

A director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for damages for any breach of duty as a director, except to the extent that such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the Business Corporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. Any repeal or modification of this paragraph 7 by the stockholders of the Corporation shall not affect adversely any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

Art. 8 Current Version

The office of the Corporation shall be located in the City of Corning, Steuben County, New York. The Secretary of State of the State of New York is designated as the agent of the Corporation upon whom process in any action or proceeding against it may be served, and the address within the State to which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of process in any action or proceeding against the Corporation which may be served upon him is One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, New York, 14831, Attention of the Secretary.

Below are the proposed amended sections, as they would appear in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation if the proposed Amendment is approved by shareholders:

Art. 5 Proposed Version

(f) Current subsection 5(f) is deleted in its entirety.

B-5


Current Article 6 is deleted in its entirety, and replaced by the following renumbered Articles.

Art. 6 Proposed Version

A director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for damages for any breach of duty as a director, except to the extent that such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the Business Corporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. Any repeal or modification of this paragraph 6 by the shareholders of the Corporation shall not affect adversely any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

Art. 7 Proposed Version

The office of the Corporation shall be located in the City of Corning, Steuben County, New York. The Secretary of State of the State of New York is designated as the agent of the Corporation upon whom process in any action or proceeding against it may be served, and the address within the State to which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of process in any action or proceeding against the Corporation which may be served upon him is One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, New York, 14831, Attention of the Secretary.

B-6


APPENDIX C

Corning Incorporated

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee Charter

Purpose and Role

The Audit Committee is a committee of Corning’s Board of Directors. Its primary function is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information which will be provided to the shareholders and others, the systems of internal control over financial reporting which management and the Board of Directors have established, and the audit process, as well as integrity of the company’s financial statements, the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, and the performance of the internal auditor and the independent auditors. In addition, the Audit Committee provides an open avenue of communication between the internal auditors, the independent auditors, financial and senior management, and the Board of Directors. Except as otherwise required by applicable laws, regulations or listing standards, all major decisions are considered by the Board of Directors as a whole.

The Audit Committee recognizes that it is the duty of management and the independent auditor to plan and conduct audits and to determine that Corning’s financial statements are complete, accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee further recognizes that the conduct of investigations, the resolutions of disagreements, if any, with the independent auditor and compliance with laws, regulations and Corning’s Code of Conduct are a management function.

Composition

The membership of the Audit Committee shall consist of at least three or more directors as determined by the Board of Directors, of whom in the judgment of the Board of Directors shall meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, and be free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a member of the Audit Committee. At least one member of the Audit Committee shall in the judgment of the Board of Directors be an “audit committee financial expert” under rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and one member (who may also serve as the audit committee financial expert) shall in the judgment of the Board of Directors have accounting or related financial management expertise in accordance with New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards. Further, no member of the Audit Committee shall be an active or retired employee of Corning. Members of the Audit Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Audit Committee members shall not simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies.

The Audit Committee is appointed by the full Board of Directors at its annual organizational meeting.

Meetings

The Audit Committee shall meet in person at least four times per year or more frequently as circumstances require. The Committee may ask members of management or others to attend the meeting and provide pertinent information as necessary. In addition, management and the Audit Committee will meet telephonically to discuss and review the quarterly and annual financial statements and company disclosures in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” prior to the filing of a report on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K. The Audit Committee shall periodically meet separately, in executive session, with management, the internal auditor and the independent auditor. The Audit Committee shall report regularly to the Board of Directors with respect to its activities and make recommendations as appropriate.

 

A-1C-1


Responsibilities and Duties

To fulfill its responsibilities and duties, the Audit Committee shall:

Financial Reporting

 

1.

Perform a timely review of quarterly and annual financial statements and other financial information provided to shareholders.

 

2.

Confirm that financial management and the independent auditor perform a timely analysis of significant reporting issues and judgments made and report key issues to the Committee, including discussion of major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentation.

 

3.

Inquire of management, the internal audit partner, and independent auditor about significant risks or exposures, assess the steps management has taken to minimize such risk to the company, and evaluate the need for disclosure thereof.

 

4.

Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements of the company, including: (a) company disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” (b) any material changes in accounting principles or practices used in preparing the financial statements prior to the filing of a report on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q, and (c) items required by Statement of Auditing Standards 61, Statement of Auditing Standards 100 and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 52 in effect at that time for annual and quarterly statements.

 

5.

Review and discuss generally with management Corning’s processes for quarterly earnings press releases, earnings guidance and other financial information provided to investors, analysts and rating agencies.

 

6.

Review with the independent auditor, the internal auditor and management: (a) the adequacy and effectiveness of the systems of internal control over financial reporting (including any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses as well as significant changes in internal control over financial reporting reported to the Audit Committee by the independent auditor or management), accounting practices, and disclosure controls and procedures; and (b) current accounting trends and developments, and take such related action as appropriate.

 

7.

Discuss with financial management and the independent auditor their qualitative judgments about the appropriateness, not just the acceptability, of accounting principles and financial reporting practices used or proposed to be used, as well as the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives and off-balance sheet structures.

 

8.

Issue a letter for inclusion in Corning’s Annual Report on Form 10-KProxy Statement that includes disclosures as required by SEC regulations.

 

9.

Recommend to the Board of Directors whether the financial statements should be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

10.

Review with the independent auditor and the internal audit partner the adequacy of the company’s internal control over financial reporting (including information systems and security); and related significant findings and recommendations of the independent auditor and internal audit, together with management’s responses.

 

C-2


11.

Review and discuss disclosures made by management about any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting or material weaknesses therein and any fraud involving management or other employees who have a significant role in Corning’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

A-2


12.

Review and discuss management’s plans to perform annual and quarterly assessments of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to support management’sthe management report on internal control over financial reporting as required by SEC regulation.

��

13.

Review, at least annually, the scope and results of the internal audit program, including then current and future programs of the internal auditor, procedures for implementing accepted recommendations made by the independent auditor, and any significant matters contained in reports from the internal auditor.

Audit Process

Appointment of auditors

 

14.

On an annual basis, appoint or re-appoint the independent auditor and review and approve the discharge of the independent auditor. Instruct the independent auditor (a) that they are ultimately accountable to the Audit Committee; (b) that the Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to appoint, retain, evaluate and replace the independent auditor; and (c) that the Audit Committee, as the shareholders’ independent representative, is the independent auditor’s client.

 

15.

Approve management’s recommendation of the internal auditors to be nominated. Review and approve the discharge of the internal auditors.

 

16.

Review and concur in the appointment or replacement of the management individual charged with the role of overseeing internal audit processes.

Performance, independence and qualification of auditors

 

17.

Annually, review and assess the following concerning the competence of the independent auditor and engagement team:

 

Resumes of key engagement audit personnel.

 

The quality control procedures of the firm serving as independent auditor.

 

The results of the most recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board quality control review or other assessments of the firm serving as independent auditor.

 

18.

Receive and review: (a) report by the independent auditor describing the independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the independent auditing firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and (b) other required reports from the independent auditor.

 

19.

Discuss with the auditors and management the independence of the internal auditor and the independent auditor, including a review of services and related fees provided by the independent auditor and the internal auditors. Review disclosures from the independent auditor required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ruleRule 3526.

 

C-3


20.

Ensure the rotation of the lead audit partner having primary responsibility for the external audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit and other partners on the account as required by SEC regulation.regulations.

 

21.Set clear

Approve management’s policies for Corning’s hiring of employees or former employees of the independent auditor who participate in any capacity in the audit of Corning. On an annual basis, management should provide the Audit Committee Chair with information on compliance with that policy.

 

22.

Review with management and the internal audit partner, annually, the internal audit department’s charter, staffing and significant objectives.

A-3


Compensation of the independent auditor

 

23.

The Audit Committee shall be directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work. The independent auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee.

 

24.

The Audit Committee shall preapprove all auditing services and all permitted non-audit services (including fees and terms thereof) to be performed for Corning by its independent auditor. The Audit Committee may delegate authority to its chairman to grant preapprovals of permitted non-audit services, provided that decisions of such individual be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Review of audit plans and results

 

25.

Review with the internal audit partner and the independent auditor the coordination of audit effort to assure completeness of coverage, reduction of redundant efforts, and the effective use of audit resources.

Review of audit results

 

26.

Review and discuss with management, the internal audit partner and the independent auditor at the completion of the annual audit the following:

 

 a)

Annual report of the company, including the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes.

 

 b)

Results of the audit of the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the related report thereon.

 

 c)

Consider whether any changes to the internal controls or disclosure controls processes and procedures are appropriate in light of management’s assessment or the independent auditor’s report.

 

 d)

Significant changes in the audit plan and any serious disputes or difficulties with management encountered during the audit.

 

 e)

Other communications as required by generally accepted auditing standards.

C-4


Other Items

 

27.

Review policies and procedures with respect to officers’ expense accounts and perquisites, including their use of corporate assets, and the results of the annual review of these areas conducted by internal audit.

 

28.

Review legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements and related corporate compliance policies, and programs and reports from regulators.

 

29.

Review the status of compliance with laws, regulations and internal procedures; the scope and status of systems designed to promote company compliance with laws, regulations and internal procedures, through receiving reports from management, legal counsel and third parties as determined by the Audit Committee.

 

30.

Discuss company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, and review contingent liabilities and risks that may be material to Corning, as well as major legislative and regulatory developments which could materially impact Corning’s contingent liabilities and risks.

 

31.

Establish procedures for the confidential and anonymous receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, as well as the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

 

32.

Investigate and respond to any instances or allegations of inappropriate behavior by management concerning questions of compliance with securities laws or inquiries as may be reported by legal counsel. The Chief Compliance Officer has authority to communicate directly with the Chairperson of the Audit Committee regarding any allegation that a high level executive is, or was, involved in criminal conduct.

 

A-4


33.

Review, approve or ratify transactions between the company and related persons that are required to be disclosed under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K, using the definitions of “transactions” and “related person” in Item 404.

General

 

34.

At least semi-annually, meet with the internal audit partner, the independent auditor, and management in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Audit Committee or these groups believe should be discussed privately with the Audit Committee.

 

35.

Report Audit Committee actions to the Board of Directors with such recommendations, as the Audit Committee may deem appropriate. At the Chairman’s option, the independent auditor should be made available to meet with the Board of Directors annually or when otherwise appropriate.

 

36.

Conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Audit Committee and evaluate the adequacy of the Audit Committee’s charter annually.

 

37.

The Audit Committee shall have the power to authorize investigations into any matters within the Audit Committee’s scope of responsibilities and hire outside resources and professionals in conjunction therewith.

 

38.

The Audit Committee will perform such others functions as assigned by law, the corporation’s bylaws, or the Board of Directors.

 

C-5


39.

Obtain advice and assistance, as appropriate, of independent counsel and other advisors as necessary to fulfill the responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

Report

 

40.

The Audit Committee shall prepare a report each year for inclusion in the company’s proxy statement.disclosure required by Item 407(d)(3)(i) of Regulation S-K.

 

A-5C-6


APPENDIX BD

Corning Incorporated

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Committee Charter

Purpose

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to discharge the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s CEO, other elected officers and directors; and to prepare the disclosure required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating the director, elected officer and other key executive compensation, benefit and perquisite plans, policies and programs of the Company. Except as otherwise required by applicable laws, regulations or listing standards, all major decisions are considered by the Board of Directors as a whole.

Committee Membership

The Compensation Committee shall consist of no fewer than three directors, all of whom in the judgment of the Board of Directors shall be independent. A person may serve on the Compensation Committee only if the Board of Directors determines he or she is a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; satisfies the requirements of “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code; and meets the independence requirements in the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. One member of the Compensation Committee will serve as the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee.

The members of the Compensation Committee shall be appointed by the Board on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Compensation Committee members may be replaced by the Board.

Committee Authority and Responsibilities

 

1.

The Compensation Committee shall annually review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO and other officer compensation, evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and as a Committee or together with the independent members of the Board, determine and approve the CEO’s compensation levels based on this evaluation. In determining the base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive components of CEO compensation, the Compensation Committee will consider multiple factors including the Company’s performance and relative shareholder return, the value of similar incentive awards to CEOs at comparable companies, and the awards given to the CEO in past years.

 

2.

The Compensation Committee shall have the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of director, CEO or senior executive compensation and shall have sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee shall also have authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors as deemed appropriate or necessary by the Committee.

 

3.

The Compensation Committee shall annually review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of all directors, elected officers and other key non-CEO executives, including annual or multi-year incentive-compensation plans and equity-based incentive plans. The Compensation Committee does not, and shall not, cause or permit employee stock option grants to be backdated.

 

D-1


4.

The Compensation Committee shall annually review and approve, for the CEO and the other elected officers and key executives of the Company:

 (a)

the annual base salary level;

 (b)

the annual incentive opportunity level;

B-1


 (c)

the long-term incentive opportunity level;

 (d)

employment agreements, severance arrangements, and change in control agreements/provisions, in each case as, when and if appropriate; and,

 (e)

any special, supplemental or nonqualified benefits or other perquisites relating to the CEO and other officers and key executives of the Company.

 

5.

The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate. Members of a subcommittee may include directors of the Company, employees of the Company, consultants or any other parties as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.

 

6.

The Compensation Committee shall make regular reports to the Board. The Compensation Committee shall meet at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board (currently established at six meetings per year). Additional special meetings of the Compensation Committee will be convened at such other times as it deems necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.

 

7.

The Compensation Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually, and conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Committee.

 

8.

The Compensation Committee shall review and discuss with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”). Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee shall determine whether to recommend to the Board that the CD&A be included in the company’s annual report or proxy statement.

 

B-2D-2


APPENDIX CE

Corning Incorporated

Corporate Relations Committee Of The Board of Directors

Committee Charter

Purpose and Scope of the Committee’s work:

The function of the Corporate Relations Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility by reviewing the corporation’s strategies and policies in the areas of public relations and reputation, employment policy and employee relations, public policy, and community responsibility. The Committee focuses its work in the following general areas:

 

The corporation’s public relations and reputation.

 

Areas include corporate identity, investor relations, media relations, and product liability.

 

The corporation’s responsibilities as an employer and its relationship with employees.

 

Areas include safety and health policies; code of conduct; values; human resource and industrial relations strategies; and internal communications strategies.

 

The corporation’s relationship and role with governmental agencies and public policy.

 

Areas include relationships with significant governmental agencies in the countries in which the corporation operates.

 

The corporation’s responsibilities as a community member.

 

Areas include environmental policies, charitable contribution strategies, and significant projects undertaken to improve communities within which the company has significant operations and employment.

Meeting Schedule: Generally meets in February, April, July, October and December.

 

C-1E-1


APPENDIX DF

Corning Incorporated

Finance Committee of the Board of Directors

Committee Charter

Purpose of the Committee

The Board of Directors has established a Finance Committee to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities across the principal areas of corporate finance for the company and its subsidiaries. As appropriate in its judgment from time to time, the Finance Committee will assist the Board by reviewing such matters as capital structure including equity and debt financing and repurchase activities, capital expenditures, cash management, banking activities and relationships, investments and dispositions, risk management, insurance.

Committee Membership

The membership shall consist of at least three independent directors as determined by the Board. At least one member shall have financial management expertise such as banking or investment management. Members of the Finance Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

Committee members are appointed by the full Board of Directors at its annual organizational meeting or as the Board shall determine to fill vacancies on the Finance Committee or to adjust its membership as needs may arise from time to time. The chair is designated by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Committee Operations

The Finance Committee shall normally meet five times each year and generally in conjunction with the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors, or more frequently as circumstances require as the Chair of the Finance Committee or Chairman of the Board may direct. The Finance committee shall maintain written minutes of its meetings. At each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors, the Chair of the Finance Committee shall provide the Board of Directors with a report of the Committee’s activities and proceedings. The Committee may ask members of management or others to attend the meeting and provide pertinent information as necessary.

For the transaction of business at any meeting of the Committee, a majority of the members shall constitute a quorum.

The Committee shall annually review its charter and conduct a self assessment of its performance.

Responsibilities and Duties

To assist the Board of Directors, the Finance Committee shall be responsible for reviewing with company management the strategies, operating plans, company policies and actions related to the significant corporate finance matters of the company. Within the authorized levels delegated to it by the Board, the Finance Committee may approve certain actions within these areas of corporate finance. The matters within its review scope shall include:

1.1. Capital structure including discussion of the appropriateness, not just the acceptability, of all material transactions prior to execution. The committee shall review and recommend for approval by the Board:

the Company’s long-term capital structure guidelines;

D-1


the dividend policy and declaration of dividends or other forms of distributions of the Company’s stock, such as splits in the form of a stock dividend;

 

F-1


the repurchase of the Company’s stock; and

the Company’s short and long term financing transactions.

2. Capital expenditure plans and specific capital projects.

2.Capital expenditure plans and specific capital projects.

3. Mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and investments in third parties.

3.Mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and investments in third parties.

4. The company’s cash management plans and activities.

4.The company’s cash management plans and activities.

5.5. Strategies for managing certain exposures to financial, economic or hazard risks including:

Hedging strategies related to foreign currency, interest rate, and commodity exposures;

Insurance programs, including coverage for property, casualty, fiduciary, political risk, and directors and officers; and

Review of the corporation’s enterprise risk management process and top corporate risks as prepared annually by the Risk Council.

6. Funding strategies and actions for the company’s pension and other post-employment benefits programs

6.Funding strategies and actions for the company’s pension and other post-employment benefits programs

7. The company’s tax situation and strategy.

7.The company’s tax situation and strategy.

8. The quarterly and annual financial statements, the company’s financial plans and other financial information that management uses in its internal decision analysis activities.

8.The quarterly and annual financial statements, the company’s financial plans and other financial information that management uses in its internal decision analysis activities.

9. The company’s credit ratings and ratings objectives.

9.The company’s credit ratings and ratings objectives.

Other Activities

10. Policies and procedures with respect to Debt Management, Financial Risk Management, and Insurance.

10.Policies and procedures with respect to Debt Management, Financial Risk Management, and Insurance.

11. Legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements as they pertain to financing or risk management activities of the company.

11.Legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements as they pertain to financing or risk management activities of the company.

General

The Committee may engage outside independent advisors in order to obtain advice and assistance, as it may consider necessary or advisable.

Approval Authority

The Finance Committee is required to approve certain levels of capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments and dispositions. The Board periodically authorizes the level of approval authority delegated to the Committee.

The Committee will review items that exceed their approval limits and make recommendations to the full Board.

 

D-2F-2


APPENDIX EG

Corning Incorporated

Nominating and Corporate Governance of the Board of Directors

Committee Charter

Purpose

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall: (1) identify and recommend qualified individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board; (2) develop and recommend to the Board a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines; (3) lead the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance and oversee the evaluation of management; (4) to recommend to the Board director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders; (5) recommend to the Board director nominees for each of its standing committees; (6) evaluate and recommend corporate governance changes and modifications as appropriate and (7) undertake such other duties as may be delegated to it from time to time. The Committee shall report to the Board on a regular basis and not less often than twice a year.

Committee Membership

The Committee shall consist of three or more directors, all of whom, in the judgment of the Board, shall be “independent” under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.

The members shall be appointed by the Board. They shall serve at the pleasure of the Board and for such term as the Board may determine.

Committee Structure and Operations

The Board shall designate one member of the Committee to serve as chairperson of the Committee. The Committee shall meet in person or telephonically at least twice a year at a time and place determined by the Committee chairperson, with further meetings to occur when deemed necessary or desirable by the Committee or its chairperson.

Committees Duties and Responsibilities

To fulfill its responsibilities and duties the Committee shall:

 

1.

Make recommendations to the Board from time to time as to changes that the Committee believes to be desirable with regard to the appropriate size, functions and needs of the Board.

 

2.

Establish the criteria for membership; such criteria should cover, among other things, diversity, experience, skill set and the ability to act on behalf of shareholders.

 

3.

Identify individuals believed to be qualified to become Board members, and to recommend to the Board the nominees to stand for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders. In the case of a vacancy in the office of director, the Committee shall recommend to the Board an individual to fill such vacancy either through appointment by the Board or through election by stockholders. In nominating candidates, the Committee shall take into consideration such factors as it deems appropriate, including judgment, experience, skills and personal character of the candidate, as well as its assessment of the needs of the Board and the Committee.

 

4.

Conduct appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates.

 

5.

Review candidates recommended by shareholders.

 

G-1


6.

Recommend to the Board the membership of any committee of the Board and to identify and recommend Board members qualified to fill vacancies on any committee of the Board.

 

E-1


7.

Recommend director nominees for approval by the Board and its shareholders.

 

8.

Assist the Board in assessing whether individual members of the Board are independent within the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.

 

9.

Establish director retirement policies.

 

10.

Review the outside activities of, and to consider questions of possible conflicts of interest of, Board members and senior executives.

 

11.

Review and approve transactions between the company and related persons that are to be disclosed under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K, using the definitions of “transactions” and “related person” in Item 404.

 

12.

Oversee and assist the Board with an annual assessment of the Board’s performance through such process as the Committee shall determine advisable including, if appropriate, the solicitation of comments from each member of the Board. The annual assessment shall be discussed with the full Board following the end of each fiscal year.

 

13.

Develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles for the company, to review those principles at least annually, and to recommend any proposed changes to the Board as the Committee deems advisable.

 

14.

Review and evaluate governance trends, rules and best practices to determine impact and potential changes for consideration.

 

15.

Review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually, and conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Committee.

 

16.

Review and recommend to the Board responses to shareholder proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement.

 

17.

Review and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation tendered by a director in compliance with the Company’s majority voting policy upon the director’s failure to receive the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast in any uncontested election.

Resources and Authority of the Committee

The Committee shall have the resources and authority appropriate to discharge its duties and responsibilities, including the authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or outside legal, accounting or other advisors. The Committee shall have the sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify director candidates and shall have sole authority to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms.

 

E-2G-2


APPENDIX FH

Corning Incorporated

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors of Corning Incorporated, acting on the recommendation of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has adopted these guidelines to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees.

Role of the Board

The business and affairs of Corning Incorporated are managed by or under the direction of its Board of Directors in accordance with New York law. The directors’ fiduciary duty is to exercise their business judgment in the best interests of Corning Incorporated’s shareholders.

Board Structure and Composition

Board Size.  The size of the Board will provide for sufficient diversity among non-employee directors while also facilitating substantive discussions in which each director can participate meaningfully. The Board size, currently 1415 members, will be set by the Board on recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and within the limits prescribed by Corning Incorporated’s by-laws.

Independent Directors.  A substantial majority of the Board will consist of directors whom the Board has determined to be independent. In general, an independent director must have no material relationship with Corning Incorporated, directly or indirectly. For this purpose, Corning Incorporated will ensure that it complies with the independence requirements of SEC and the NYSE Listing Standards, as well as director qualification standards recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

“Immediate family member” includes a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, in-laws, and any one (other than employees) who shares such person’s home. Materiality for this purpose will be evaluated both from the standpoint of Corning Incorporated and from the standpoint of the director or the persons or entities with which the director is affiliated.

Notwithstanding the fact that an individual may not satisfy one or more of the above criteria, the Board may nevertheless determine that the director has no material relationship with the corporation that would interfere with independence and should be considered independent. In that case, the reasons for any such determination will be specifically set forth in the proxy statement for any meeting at which that director is standing for election.

Chairman and CEO.  The Board believes it is appropriate for Corning Incorporated’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) also to serve as Chairman of the Board. However, the Board retains the authority to separate those functions if it deems such action appropriate in the future.

Lead Director.  The Board will designate and publicly disclose a non-employee director who will lead the non-employee directors’ executive sessions.

Term Limits.  The Board believes that experience as a Corning Incorporated director is a valuable asset, especially in light of the size and global scope of the corporation’s operations. Therefore, directors are not subject to term limits except as a result of reaching the Board’s mandatory retirement age.

Mandatory Retirement.  NoAs of the annual meeting of shareholders in the year a non-employee director may stand for election after reachingreaches age 74.74, such director will resign.

H-1


Other Directorships.  Recognizing the substantial time commitment required of directors,directors: (a) an employee director of Corning will serve on the board of no more than threetwo other public companies, (b) a non-employee director will serve

F-1


on the board of no more than five other public companies, and (c) unless otherwise approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the chief executive officer who is a Corning director will serve on the board of no more than twoonly one other public companies.company. Each director will serve on the boards of other public and private companies and not-for-profit entities only to the extent that, in the judgment of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, such services do not detract from the director’s ability to devote the necessary time and attention to Corning Incorporated. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will periodically review all directors’ service on the boards of other public companies.

Change in Status.  To avoid any potential for a conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest, directors will not accept a seat on any additional public company board or any governmental position without first reviewing the matter with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, a non-employee director will tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the event of retirement or other substantial change in the nature of the director’s employment or other significant responsibilities. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines that the resignation should be accepted, the Committee will refer that recommendation to the Board.

Director Selection; Qualifications; Education

Director Candidates.  The Board, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will nominate a slate of director candidates for election at each annual meeting of shareholders and will elect directors to fill vacancies, including vacancies created as a result of any increase in the size of the Board, between annual meetings.

Qualifications.  Candidates are selected for their character, judgment, diversity of experience, acumen and their ability to act on behalf of shareholders. Scientific expertise, business experience, prior governmental service and familiarity with national and international issues affecting business are among the relevant criteria. Final approval of a candidate is determined by the full Board.

Orientation.  New directors will receive a comprehensive orientation from responsible executives regarding Corning Incorporated’s business and affairs, including written materials, meetings with key management and visits to facilities.

Continuing Education.  Reviews of particular aspects of Corning Incorporated’s operations will be presented by responsible executives from time to time as part of the agenda of regular Board meetings. The Board will also normally conduct an on-site inspection of a Corning Incorporated facility in conjunction with a regular Board meeting at least once every other year.

Majority Voting for Directors

Uncontested Elections. Any director candidate who does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in any uncontested election will promptly following certification of the election results tender his or her resignation to the Board. A director candidate will have failed to receive the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast if the number of “withhold” votes in respect of such director candidate’s election exceeds the number of votes “for” such director candidate’s election (excluding abstentions). An election will be deemed to be “uncontested” if the number of director candidates does not exceed the number of directors to be elected.

Evaluation of Tendered Resignation. The Board, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will decide whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that it considers relevant.

Recusal. Any director candidate who tenders his or her resignation in accordance with the resignation policy will recuse himself or herself from the deliberations, recommendation or decision, as applicable, of the

F-2


Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board regarding whether to accept such resignation. However, if a majority of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or Board, as applicable, are required to tender resignations in accordance with the director resignation policy, then the independent directors who are not required to tender resignations will appoint a committee from amongst themselves to consider the resignations and, in the event there are fewer than three such independent directors, the entire Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or Board, as applicable, may participate in the deliberations, recommendation or decision, as applicable.

Disclosure of Board Decision. Within 90 days of the certification of the election results, the Board will decide whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Board will promptly disclose its decision in a press release or SEC filing. Such press release or SEC filing will include, if applicable, an explanation of the Board’s reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.

Board Meetings and Director Responsibilities

Number of Regular Meetings.  The Board currently holds regular meetings six times per year.

Agenda and Briefing Material.  An agenda for each Board meeting and briefing materials will, to the extent practicable in light of the timing of matters that require Board attention, be distributed to each director at least one week prior to each meeting. Briefing materials should be concise and yet sufficiently detailed to permit directors to make informed judgments. The Chairman will normally determine the agenda for Board meetings, but any director may request the inclusion of particular items.

Meeting Attendance.  It is expected that each director will make every effort to attend each Board meeting, each annual meeting of shareholders and each meeting of any committee on which he or she sits. Attendance in person is preferred but attendance by teleconference is permitted if necessary under the circumstances.

H-2


Director Preparedness.  Each director should be familiar with the agenda for each meeting, should have carefully reviewed all other materials distributed in advance of the meeting, and should be prepared to participate meaningfully in the meeting and to discuss all scheduled items of business.

Confidentiality.  The proceedings and deliberations of the Board and its committees are confidential. Each director will maintain the confidentiality of information received in connection with his or her service as a director.

Non-employee Director Executive Sessions

An executive session of the non-employee directors will normally be held immediately before, during or after each meeting of the full Board. The Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or other non-employee director as chosen by the Board will preside at the executive sessions, and will be disclosed in the proxy statement per the NYSE rules. Any non-employee director may raise issues for discussion at an executive session.

Board Self-evaluation

Annually, the Board will evaluate its performance and effectiveness as a Board, as well as the performance and effectiveness of its committees, and will abide by NYSE Listing Standards for self-evaluation for selected Committees.

Committees

Committees. The Board will appoint from among its members an executive committee and other committees it determines are necessary or appropriate to conduct its business. Currently, the standing committees of the

F-3


Board are the Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (which serves as the nominating and corporate governance committee within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange rules), Compensation Committee, Finance Committee, and Corporate Relations Committee.

Committee Composition.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Board Audit Committee, and Board Compensation Committee will consist solely of independent directors. With the exception of the Executive Committee where the Chairman of the Board will be the Chair, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend committee Chairs to the Board for approval.

In addition:

 

the membership of the Board Audit Committee must meet such additional requirements as may apply under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission;

 

the membership of the Board Compensation Committee must meet such additional requirements as may apply under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and must qualify as an independent “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and

 

no member of the Board Compensation Committee may be part of a compensation committee interlock within the meaning of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Committee Charters.  Each of the committees will have a written charter setting further its responsibilities if they are not stated in the company’s by-laws. Charters will be adopted by the Board based on the recommendation of the applicable committee.

H-3


Committee Assignments.  Membership of each committee will be determined by the Board on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Consideration will be given to rotating committee memberships periodically.

Committee Self-evaluation.  Annually, each of the Board committees will conduct an evaluation of its performance and effectiveness and will consider whether any changes to the committee’s charter are appropriate.

Committee Reports.  The Chair of each Board committee will report to the full Board on the activities of his or her committee, including the results of the committee’s self-evaluations and any recommended changes to the committee’s charter.

CEO Performance Review

At least annually, the non-employee directors will, in conjunction with the Board Compensation Committee, review the performance of the CEO in light of the corporation’s goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee meets annually with the CEO to receive his or her recommendations concerning such goals.

Management Succession Planning and Performance Review

At least annually, the Board will review and approve succession plans for the CEO and other senior executives. Succession planning will address both succession in the ordinary course of business and contingency planning in case of emergencies or unforeseen events. To assist the Board, the CEO annually provides the Board with an assessment of senior managers and of their potential to succeed him or her. The CEO also provides the Board with an assessment of persons considered potential successors to certain senior management positions.

The function of the Board in monitoring the performance of senior management is fulfilled by the presence of outside directors who have a substantive knowledge of the business. The Board selects the senior management team, which is charged with the conduct of the company’s business. Having selected the senior management

F-4


team, the Board acts as an advisor to senior management and ultimately monitors its performance. The Compensation Committee also is responsible for setting performance goals and compensation for the direct reports to the CEO. These decisions are approved or ratified by action of the outside directors of the Board at a meeting or executive session of that group.

Board Resources

Access to Employees.  Non-employee directors will have full access to the senior management of Corning Incorporated and other employees. The Board expects that there will be regular opportunities for directors to meet with the CEO and other members of senior management in Board and committee meetings and in other formal or informal settings.

Authority to Retain Advisors.  It is normally expected that information regarding the corporation’s business and affairs will be provided to the Board by Corning Incorporated management and staff and by the corporation’s independent auditor. However, the Board and each committee have the authority to retain such outside independent advisors, including accountants, legal counsel, or other experts, as it deems appropriate. Non-employee directors will have full access to such outside independent advisors to ask questions regarding Corning Incorporated. The fees and expenses of any such advisors will be paid by Corning Incorporated.

Code of Conduct

Corning Incorporated has adopted a comprehensive “Our Code of Conduct.” These standards include policies calling for strict observance of all laws applicable to Corning Incorporated’s business and describes conflicts of interest policies which, among other things, requires that directors avoid any conflict between their

H-4


own interests and the interests of the corporation in dealing with suppliers, customers, and other third parties, and in the conduct of their personal affairs, including transactions in securities of the corporation, any affiliate, or any nonaffiliated organization. Each director is expected to be familiar with and to follow these policies to the extent applicable to them.

Communication by Interested Parties with the Non-employee Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will maintain procedures for interested parties to communicate directly with the non-employee directors. The Board believes that it is management’s role to speak for the company. These procedures will be published in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of shareholders and posted on Corning Incorporated’s Internet site.

Corning Incorporated Non-employee Director Compensation

Compensation for non-employee directors will be determined by the independent members of the Board on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and will be reviewed annually at a minimum. Non-employee director compensation will be set at a level that is consistent with market practice, taking into account the size and scope of the corporation’s business and the responsibilities of its directors. All directors are expected to own stock in the company in an amount that is appropriate for them. In considering benefits and compensation of non-employee directors, the Board will consider whether questions regarding directors’ independence may be raised by anything that would be considered non-customary, or the company providing indirect forms of compensation or benefits to a director or any substantial charitable contributions to organizations in which a director is affiliated.

Non-employee Director Stock Ownership

Within five years of joining the Board, each non-employee director will own stock in the company with a value of at least five times the company annual cash retainer paid to such director. Non-employee directors have

F-5


up to three years to return to this required stock ownership level if the company stock price drops by over twenty percent in any calendar year.

Named Executive OfficerCode of Conduct

Corning Incorporated has adopted a comprehensive “Our Code of Conduct.” These standards include policies calling for strict observance of all laws applicable to Corning Incorporated’s business and describes conflicts of interest policies which, among other things, requires that directors avoid any conflict between their

H-4


own interests and the interests of the corporation in dealing with suppliers, customers, and other third parties, and in the conduct of their personal affairs, including transactions in securities of the corporation, any affiliate, or any nonaffiliated organization. Each director is expected to be familiar with and to follow these policies to the extent applicable to them.

Communication by Interested Parties with the Non-employee Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will maintain procedures for interested parties to communicate directly with the non-employee directors. The Board believes that it is management’s role to speak for the company. These procedures will be published in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of shareholders and posted on Corning Incorporated’s Internet site.

Corning Incorporated Non-employee Director Compensation

Compensation for non-employee directors will be determined by the independent members of the Board on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and will be reviewed annually at a minimum. Non-employee director compensation will be set at a level that is consistent with market practice, taking into account the size and scope of the corporation’s business and the responsibilities of its directors. All directors are expected to own stock in the company in an amount that is appropriate for them. In considering benefits and compensation of non-employee directors, the Board will consider whether questions regarding directors’ independence may be raised by anything that would be considered non-customary, or the company providing indirect forms of compensation or benefits to a director or any substantial charitable contributions to organizations in which a director is affiliated.

Non-employee Director Stock Ownership

Within five years of hire or promotion,joining the Board, each named executive officernon-employee director will own stock in the company with a value of at least five times the following levels:

Chief Executive Officer—5 times hiscompany annual salary;

Chief Operating Officer—3 times his annual salary;

Chief Financial Officer—3 times his annual salary;

Chief Administrative Officer—3 times his annual salary; and

Chief Technology Officer—3 times his annual salary.

An officer who falls below the ownership requirement for any reason willcash retainer paid to such director. Non-employee directors have up to three years to return to thethis required minimumstock ownership level.

Bonus Recoupment Policy

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has discretion to recoup bonuses from officers and other key employees in certain circumstances, and may supplement any recoupment required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The policy is applicable to any financial restatements affecting any year on or after January 1, 2007.

The Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to executive officers and other key employees where such payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Where applicable,level if the company will seek to recoverstock price drops by over twenty percent in any amount determined to have been inappropriately received by the individual executive.calendar year.

Option Repricing

The corporation will not, without shareholder approval, amend any employee stock option to reduce the exercise price (except for appropriate adjustments in the case of a stock split or similar change in capitalization); or offer to exchange outstanding employee stock options for options having a lower exercise price; or offer to exchange options having an exercise price below the current market price for cash, restricted stock, or other consideration.

Stock Option Pricing

The corporation will grant employee stock options approved by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and reported to the Board, with the option exercise price determined by the NYSE closing price on one or more of these grant dates:

(a)on the day the stock option grant is reported to the Board after Compensation Committee approval, or

(b)on the first business day of the month following date of hire for a newly hired employee granted stock options, or

(c)on a fixed, future grant date or dates as approved by the Committee and reported to the Board.

Upon delegation by the Compensation Committee, the Chief Administrative Officer may grant limited numbers of stock options to non-officer active employees in special situations. These grants shall be effective

F-6


when signed by that Officer. The option exercise price shall be determined by the NYSE closing price on the effective grant date or on a fixed, future date. Grants awarded under this authority shall be reported to the Compensation Committee on or before its next regular meeting.

The corporation shall not backdate employee stock options or set an option exercise price in stock option grants other than in conformance with the methods described above.

Shareholder Matters

Shareholder matters such as voting rights, confidential voting, ratification of auditors, shareholder proposals receiving a majority approval and others are contained within, and governed by Corning Incorporated’s by-laws and charter.

Re-evaluation of Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board will review and revise these Corporate Governance Guidelines as appropriate from time to time based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Director Qualification Standards

The Board adopted a formal set of director qualification standards under the NYSE Listing Standards approved by the SEC in November 2003 concerning determination of director independence. To be considered independent, a director must be determined by resolution of the Board after due deliberation, to have no material relationship with the company other than as a director. In each case, the Board will broadly consider all relevant facts and circumstances and also apply the following standards:

1.A director will not be independent if within the preceding three years: (a) the director was employed by the company or any of its subsidiaries; (b) an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of the company; (c) the director was employed by or affiliated with the company’s independent internal or external auditor; (d) an immediate family member of the director was employed in a professional capacity by the company’s independent internal or external auditor; or (e) an executive officer of the company was on the board compensation committee of a second company that employed either the director or an immediate family member as an executive officer.

2.A director will not be independent if within the preceding three years: (a) the director or an immediate family member receives more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from the company, other than normal director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior services; (b) a director is an officer or employee of a second company that makes payments to, or receives payments from the company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of the second company’s consolidated gross revenues; (c) an immediate family member of a director is an executive officer of a second company that makes payments to, or receives payments from the company at the levels in 2(b); or (d) if a director serves as a paid executive officer of a charitable organization that received contributions in any single fiscal year that exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues. The Board shall consider the materiality of any such relationships, even if they are below the dollar thresholds.

3.The determination of whether a section 2 relationship is material or not (and whether a director is independent or not) shall be made by those directors on the Board who satisfy the independence guidelines.

4.The company will not make any personal loans or extensions of credit to directors or executive officers.

5.For independence, all directors must deal at arms’ length with the company and its subsidiaries and disclose circumstances that are material to the director if they might be viewed as a conflict of interest.

F-7


APPENDIX G

Corning Incorporated

Code of Ethics

For Chief Executive Officer and Financial Executives

In my role as an executive of Corning Incorporated, I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

1.I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.

2.I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely, and understandable.

3.I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies. I provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure to my constituents and/or in reports provided to external constituencies (SEC, shareholders, reporting agencies, etc.).

4.I act in good faith, responsibility, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to be subordinated.

5.I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is not used for personal advantage.

6.I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my constituents’ needs.

7.I proactively promote high integrity as a responsible member of my business team and/or in my work environment.

8.I achieve responsible use of and control over all company assets and resources employed or entrusted to me.

9.I will report any known or suspected violations of this code to the Corporate Controller or the General Counsel.

10.I am accountable for adhering to this code.

Dated:

Signed:

G-1


Corning Incorporated

Code of Conduct

Corning Incorporated has adopted a comprehensive “Our Code of Conduct.” These standards include policies calling for strict observance of all laws applicable to Corning Incorporated’s business and describes conflicts of interest policies which, among other things, requires that directors avoid any conflict between their

H-4


own interests and the interests of the corporation in dealing with suppliers, customers, and other third parties, and in the conduct of their personal affairs, including transactions in securities of the corporation, any affiliate, or any nonaffiliated organization. Each director is expected to be familiar with and to follow these policies to the extent applicable to them.

Communication by Interested Parties with the Non-employee Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will maintain procedures for interested parties to communicate directly with the non-employee directors. The Board believes that it is management’s role to speak for the company. These procedures will be published in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of shareholders and posted on Corning Incorporated’s Internet site.

Corning Incorporated Non-employee Director Compensation

Compensation for non-employee directors will be determined by the independent members of the Board on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and will be reviewed annually at a minimum. Non-employee director compensation will be set at a level that is consistent with market practice, taking into account the size and scope of the corporation’s business and the responsibilities of its directors. All directors are expected to own stock in the company in an amount that is appropriate for them. In considering benefits and compensation of non-employee directors, the Board will consider whether questions regarding directors’ independence may be raised by anything that would be considered non-customary, or the company providing indirect forms of compensation or benefits to a director or any substantial charitable contributions to organizations in which a director is affiliated.

Non-employee Director Stock Ownership

Within five years of joining the Board, each non-employee director will own stock in the company with a value of at least five times the company annual cash retainer paid to such director. Non-employee directors have up to three years to return to this required stock ownership level if the company stock price drops by over twenty percent in any calendar year.

Named Executive Officer Stock Ownership

Within five years of hire or promotion, each named executive officer will own stock in the company with a value of at least the following levels:

Ÿ

Chief Executive Officer - 5 times his annual salary;

Ÿ

Chief Operating Officer – 3 times his annual salary;

Ÿ

Chief Financial Officer – 3 times his annual salary;

Ÿ

Chief Administrative Officer – 3 times his annual salary; and

Ÿ

Chief Technology Officer – 3 times his annual salary.

An officer who falls below the ownership requirement for any reason will have up to three years to return to the required minimum ownership level.

Bonus Recoupment Policy

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has discretion to recoup bonuses from officers and other key employees in certain circumstances, and may supplement any recoupment required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The policy is applicable to any financial restatements affecting any year on or after January 1, 2007.

H-5


The Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to executive officers and other key employees where such payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Where applicable, the company will seek to recover any amount determined to have been inappropriately received by the individual executive.

Option Repricing

The corporation will not, without shareholder approval, amend any employee stock option to reduce the exercise price (except for appropriate adjustments in the case of a stock split or similar change in capitalization); or offer to exchange outstanding employee stock options for options having a lower exercise price; or offer to exchange options having an exercise price below the current market price for cash, restricted stock, or other consideration.

Stock Option Pricing

The corporation will grant employee stock options approved by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and reported to the Board, with the option exercise price determined by the NYSE closing price on one or more of these grant dates:

(a)  on the day the stock option grant is reported to the Board after Compensation Committee approval, or

(b)  on the first business day of the month following date of hire for a newly hired employee granted stock options, or

(c)  on a fixed, future grant date or dates as approved by the Committee and reported to the Board.

Upon delegation by the Compensation Committee, the Chief Administrative Officer may grant limited numbers of stock options to non-officer active employees in special situations. These grants shall be effective when signed by that Officer. The option exercise price shall be determined by the NYSE closing price on the effective grant date or on a fixed, future date. Grants awarded under this authority shall be reported to the Compensation Committee on or before its next regular meeting.

The corporation shall not backdate employee stock options or set an option exercise price in stock option grants other than in conformance with the methods described above.

Shareholder Matters

Shareholder matters such as voting rights, confidential voting, ratification of auditors, shareholder proposals receiving a majority approval and others are contained within, and governed by Corning Incorporated’s by-laws and charter.

Re-evaluation of Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board will review and revise these Corporate Governance Guidelines as appropriate from time to time based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

H-6


Director Qualification Standards

The Board adopted a formal set of director qualification standards under the NYSE Listing Standards approved by the SEC in November 2003 concerning determination of director independence. To be considered independent, a director must be determined by resolution of the Board after due deliberation, to have no material relationship with the company other than as a director. In each case, the Board will broadly consider all relevant facts and circumstances and also apply the following standards:

1.

A director will not be independent if within the preceding three years:  (a) the director was employed by the company or any of its subsidiaries; (b) an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of the company; (c) the director was employed by or affiliated with the company’s independent internal or external auditor; (d) an immediate family member of the director was employed in a professional capacity by the company’s independent internal or external auditor; or (e) an executive officer of the company was on the board compensation committee of a second company that employed either the director or an immediate family member as an executive officer.

2.

A director will not be independent if within the preceding three years: (a) the director or an immediate family member receives more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from the company, other than normal director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior services; (b) a director is an officer or employee of a second company that makes payments to, or receives payments from the company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of the second company’s consolidated gross revenues; (c) an immediate family member of a director is an executive officer of a second company that makes payments to, or receives payments from the company at the levels in 2(b); or (d) if a director serves as a paid executive officer of a charitable organization that received contributions in any single fiscal year that exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues. The Board shall consider the materiality of any such relationships, even if they are below the dollar thresholds.

3.

The determination of whether a section 2 relationship is material or not (and whether a director is independent or not) shall be made by those directors on the Board who satisfy the independence guidelines.

4.

The company will not make any personal loans or extensions of credit to directors or executive officers.

5.

For independence, all directors must deal at arms’ length with the company and its subsidiaries and disclose circumstances that are material to the director if they might be viewed as a conflict of interest.

H-7


APPENDIX I

Corning Incorporated

Code of Ethics

For Chief Executive Officer and Financial Executives

In my role as an executive of Corning Incorporated, I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

1.

I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.

2.

I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely, and understandable.

3.

I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies. I provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure to my constituents and/or in reports provided to external constituencies (SEC, shareholders, reporting agencies, etc.).

4.

I act in good faith, responsibility, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to be subordinated.

5.

I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is not used for personal advantage.

6.

I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my constituents’ needs.

7.

I proactively promote high integrity as a responsible member of my business team and/or in my work environment.

8.

I achieve responsible use of and control over all company assets and resources employed or entrusted to me.

9.

I will report any known or suspected violations of this code to the Corporate Controller or the General Counsel.

10.

I am accountable for adhering to this code.

Dated:

Signed:

I-1


Corning Incorporated

Code of Conduct

For Directors and Executive Officers

In my role as a Director or Executive Officer of Corning Incorporated, I certify that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

 

1.

I have read Our Code of Conduct, the code of business ethics that applies generally within the Company. I will abide by its standards in carrying out my role as a Director or Executive Officer of the Company. The Code of Business Ethics for Directors and Executive Officers incorporates the provisions of Our Code of Conduct, as supplemented by this document.

 

2.

I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual and apparent conflicts with the interests of Corning Incorporated. A conflict of interest would occur when an individual’s private interest interferes—or even appears to interfere—with the interests of the Company as a whole. When any issue arises that may present an actual or apparent conflict, I will bring that issue to the attention of Corning’s Chairman or General Counsel and seek a waiver or recuse myself from action on the particular matter.

 

3.

In acting on any business for Corning Incorporated, I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies, and will act as appropriate within my position to assure that the Company complies with such rules and regulations.

 

4.

I understand the requirement that the Company provide full, fair, timely and understandable disclosure to its external constituents (SEC, shareholders, reporting agencies) and will take that requirement into proper account in carrying out my duties as a Director or Executive Officer of the Company.

 

5.

I understand that insider trading on the basis of non-public material information is both unethical and illegal and will not be tolerated by the Company. As a Director or Executive Officer, I will abide by guidance from the Company regarding appropriate periods when trading in securities of the Company may be permitted, as well as periods when such trading is not permitted.

 

6.

I respect the confidentiality of Company information acquired in the course of my duties as a Director or Executive Officer of the Company. Confidential information of the Company or its customers may not be used for personal advantage. Confidential information includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors, or harmful to the company or its customers, if disclosed.

 

7.

I understand that business opportunities within the scope of the business of the Company, as well as reasonable extensions of the scope of that business, represent corporate opportunities of Corning and may not be diverted for any separate personal purpose or benefit. I will not take for myself personally any opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information or position. I will not use corporate property, information or position for personal gain. I will not compete with the Company directly or indirectly. I will fulfill my duty to the company to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.

 

8.

I understand that the Company has a duty to deal fairly with its customers, suppliers, competitors and employees. It is a principle of the Company that no employee should take unfair advantage of another through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation, or any other practice of unfair dealing.

 

9.

I understand that I have an obligation to protect the Company’s assets and ensure their efficient use and, within the scope of my responsibilities as a director or executive officer, will ensure that Company assets are used for legitimate business purposes.

 

10.

As a director or executive officer, I recognize that the Company should proactively promote ethical behavior. Through its Code of Conduct, the Company encourages its employees to talk to supervisors, managers, Corporations General Counsel or the Corporate Controller when in doubt about the best course of action in a particular situation. The Company also encourages that employees report violations of laws,

G-2


rules, regulations or the Code of Conduct to the General Counsel of the Corporation. In addition, the Company ensures that its employees know that there will be no retaliation for reports made in good faith. I adhere to and support these principles.

Dated:

Signed:

Signed:

 

G-3I-2


APPENDIX HJ

CORNING INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE

Year Ended December 31, 2011

(Unaudited; amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

Corning’s adjusted net income and earnings per share (EPS) for the year ended December 31, 2011 are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company believes presenting non-GAAP net income and EPS is helpful in understanding the calculation of the metrics used to compute Corning’s incentive compensation. A detailed reconciliation is provided below outlining the differences between these non-GAAP measures and the directly related GAAP measures.

   Per
Share
     Net
Income
 

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and net income

    $1.67         $2,636   

Adjustments:

      

Contingent liability (a)

   0.02        27   

Restructuring, impairment and other charges (b)

   (0.05)        (83)   

Asbestos settlement (c)

   (0.01)        (15)   

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates (d)

   0.09        153   

Equity in earnings of affiliated companies (e)

   0.04        74   

Provision for income taxes (f)

   0.01        13   
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total EPS and net income

    $    1.77         $    2,805   
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

(a)In 2011, Corning recognized a credit of $27 million resulting from a reduction to a contingent liability associated with an acquisition recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

(b)In 2011, Corning recorded an $83 million after-tax asset impairment charge for certain long-lived assets in our Specialty Materials segment.

(c)In 2011, Corning recorded a charge of $15 million after-tax to adjust the asbestos liability for the change in the value of the components of the modified PCC Plan.

(d)The adjustment after-tax in 2011 for foreign exchange fluctuations for the Japanese Yen and the Korean Won was $153 million.

(e)In 2011, equity in earnings of affiliated companies included a $74 million after-tax credit for Corning’s share of the future portion of Dow Corning Corporation’s settlement of a dispute related to long term supply agreements.

(f)In 2011, Corning recorded a $26 million net tax benefit related to prior year foreign tax credits and other tax adjustments. Also in 2011, Corning recorded a $13 million net tax provision related to the adjustment of deferred taxes as a result of enacted tax rate reductions primarily in Japan.

J-1


CORNING INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE

Year Ended December 31, 2010

(Unaudited; amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

 

Corning’s adjusted net income and earnings per share (EPS) for the year ended December 31, 2010 are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company believes presenting non-GAAP net income and EPS is helpful in understanding the calculation of the metrics used to compute Corning’s incentive compensation. A detailed reconciliation is provided below outlining the differences between these non-GAAP measures and the directly related GAAP measures.

 

   Per
Share
   Net
Income
 

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and net income

  $1.82    $2,883  

Adjustments:

    

Restructuring, impairment and other charges (a)

   —       1  

Insurance settlement (b)

   0.13     206  

Asbestos settlement (c)

   0.02     30  

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates (d)

   0.08     128  

Equity in earnings of affiliated companies (e)

   0.08     120  

Loss on repurchase of debt (f)

   (0.01)   (19)

Provision for income taxes (g)

   0.13     209  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total EPS and net income

  $      2.25    $   3,558  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)

In 2010, Corning recorded a credit of $1 million after-tax for adjustments to restructuring reserves.

(b)

In 2010, Corning recorded $206 million after-tax on the settlement of business interruption and property damage insurance claims in the Display Technologies segment resulting from earthquake activity near the Shizuoka, Japan facility and a power disruption at the Taichung, Taiwan facility in 2009.

(c)

In 2010, Corning recorded a net credit of $30 million after-tax to adjust the asbestos liability for change in value of the components of the modified PCC Plan.

(d)

The adjustment after-tax in 2010 for foreign exchange fluctuations for the Japanese Yen and the Korean Won was $128 million.

(e)

In 2010, equity in earnings of affiliated companies included a credit of $20 million after-tax primarily for Corning’s share of advanced energy manufacturing tax credits at Dow Corning Corporation. Also, included is a credit of $24 million after-tax for our share of a release of valuation allowance on foreign deferred tax assets, a $15 million after-tax credit for our share of excess foreign tax credits from foreign dividends at Dow Corning Corporation and a $61 million credit for our share of a revised Samsung Corning Precision tax holiday calculation agreed to by the Korean National Tax Service.

(f)

In 2010, Corning recorded a $19 million after-tax loss on the repurchase of $126 million principal amount of our 6.2% senior unsecured notes due March 15, 2016 and $100 million principal amount of our 5.9% senior unsecured notes due March 15, 2014.

(g)

In 2010, Corning recorded a $56 million tax charge from the reversal of the deferred tax asset associated with a Medicare subsidy. Also, recorded in 2010 was a $265 million tax credit for excess foreign tax credits that resulted from the repatriation of current year earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.

 

H-1J-2


CORNING INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE

Year Ended December 31, 2009

(Unaudited; amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

 

Corning’s adjusted net income and earnings per share (EPS) for the year ended December 31, 2009 are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company believes presenting non-GAAP net income and EPS is helpful in understanding the calculation of the metrics used to compute Corning’s incentive compensation. A detailed reconciliation is provided below outlining the differences between these non-GAAP measures and the directly related GAAP measures.

 

   Per
Share
   Net
Income
(Loss)
 

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and net income

  $1.31    $2,061  

Adjustments:

    

Restructuring, impairment and other charges (a)

   (0.10)   (151)

Asbestos settlement (b)

   (0.01)   (12)

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates (c)

   0.04     52  

Equity in earnings of affiliated companies (d)

   —       —    

Provision for income taxes (e)

   0.04     58  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total EPS and net income

  $      1.28    $    2,008  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)In 2009, Corning recorded a charge of $151 million after-tax as part of the Company’s corporate-wide restructuring plan in response to lower sales in 2009.

(b)In 2009, Corning recorded a charge of $12 million after-tax to adjust the asbestos liability for change in value of the components of the Amended PCC Plan and the estimated liability for non-PCC asbestos claims.

(c)The adjustment after-tax in 2009 for foreign exchange fluctuations for the Japanese Yen and the Korean Won was $53 million.

(d)In 2009, equity in earnings of affiliated companies included a charge of $27 million after-tax for our share of restructuring charges and a credit of $27 million after-tax primarily for our share of excess foreign tax credits from foreign dividends at Dow Corning Corporation.

(e)In 2009, Corning recorded a $58 million tax benefit which included the following items: a $27 million U.S. tax credit for research and experimentation expenses; a $41 million tax credit to reflect a deferred tax asset associated with a non-taxable Medicare subsidy; and a $10 million valuation allowance due to a change in judgment about the realizability of U.S. and U.K. deferred tax assets in future years.

 

H-2J-3


CORNING INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE

Year Ended December 31, 2008

(Unaudited; amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

Corning’s adjusted net income and earnings per share (EPS) for the year ended December 31, 2008 are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company believes presenting non-GAAP net income and EPS is helpful in understanding the calculation of the metrics used to compute Corning’s incentive compensation. A detailed reconciliation is provided below outlining the differences between these non-GAAP measures and the directly related GAAP measures.

   Per
Share
  Net
Income
(Loss)
 

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and net income

  $1.42   $2,251  

Adjustments:

   

Asbestos settlement (a)

   0.21    340  

Asbestos settlement budget adjustment (b)

   0.02    31  

Restructuring, impairment and other charges (c)

   (0.01  (21

Litigation settlement (d)

   (0.01  (12

Loss on sale of business, net (e)

   (0.01  (14

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates (f)

   0.09    142  

Available-for-sale securities (g)

   (0.03  (50

Valuation allowance release (h)

   1.62    2,565  

Tax revenue settlement (i)

   0.03    43  

Equity in earnings of affiliated companies (j)

   (0.01  (18
         

Total EPS and net income

  $3.32   $5,257  
         

(a)In 2008, Corning recorded a $327 million reduction to the asbestos liability as a result of the increase in the likelihood of a settlement under the Amended PCC Plan and a corresponding decrease in the likelihood of a settlement under terms of the 2003 plan. Also, Corning recorded a net credit of $13 million to adjust the asbestos liability for the change in value of certain components of the Amended PCC Plan and the estimated liability for non-PCC asbestos claims.
(b)In 2008, the $31 million after-tax asbestos litigation adjustment represents a budget to actual adjustment to arrive at the metric to calculate incentive compensation.
(c)In 2008, Corning recorded a $21 million after-tax charge comprised primarily of severance costs for a restructuring plan in the Telecommunications segment.
(d)In 2008, Corning recorded a charge of $12 million to settle litigation associated with our Display segment.
(e)In 2008, Corning incurred a $14 million loss on the sale of a business.
(f)The adjustment after-tax in 2008 for foreign exchange fluctuations for the Japanese Yen and the Korean Won was $142 million.
(g)In 2008, Corning recorded net losses of $50 million on certain available-for-sale securities included in cash and short-term investments.
(h)In 2008, Corning recorded a valuation allowance release of $2.5 billion resulting from a change in judgment about the realizability of U.S. deferred tax assets in future years. Also in 2008, Corning released $115 million of valuation allowances resulting from a change in estimate regarding current-year U.S. taxable income.
(i)In 2008, Corning recorded a $43 million gain related to a favorable tax settlement with the Canadian Revenue Agency.
(j)In 2008, equity in earnings of affiliated companies includes an $18 million charge for Corning’s share of an other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate securities at Dow Corning Corporation.

H-3


CORNING INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009

(Unaudited; amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

 

Corning’s adjusted operating cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009 are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company believes presenting non-GAAP operating cash flow is helpful in understanding the calculation of the metrics used to compute Corning’s incentive compensation. A detailed reconciliation is provided below outlining the differences between these non-GAAP measures and the directly related GAAP measures.

 

   December 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 

Adjusted operating cash flows

  $2,723   $2,029   $2,056  

Adjustments:

    

Cash received from settlement of insurance claims (a)

   259    —      —    

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates (b)

   50    69    84  

Restructuring, impairment and other credits (c)

   (65  (21  —    

Litigation settlement (d)

   —      —      (12

Special dividend from equity affiliate (e)

   868    —      —    
             

Total EPS and net income

  $3,835   $2,077   $2,128  
             
   December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Adjusted operating cash flow

    $        3,582  $        2,723   $        2,029  

Adjustments:

    

Cash received from settlement of insurance claims(a)

    259   

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates (b)

   61   50    69  

Cash translation adjustments (c)

   (70  

Restructuring, impairment and other credits(d)

    (65  (21

Special dividend from equity affiliate (e)

   (384  868   
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

    $3,189  $        3,835   $        2,077  
  

 

 

 

 

(a)In 2010, Corning received $259 million on the settlement of business interruption and property damage insurance claims in the Display Technologies segment resulting from earthquake activity near the Shizuoka, Japan facility and a power disruption at the Taichung, Taiwan facility in 2009.

(b)In 2011, 2010 2009 and 2008,2009, the cash flow adjustment for foreign exchange fluctuations for the Japanese Yen and the Korean Won was $61 million, $50 million $69 million and $84$69 million, respectively.

(c)In 2011, the $70 million adjustment represents the translation of cash balances by non-USD functional entities to USD.

(d)In 2010 and 2009, the restructuring, impairments and other credits adjustment represents a budget to actual adjustment to arrive at the metric to calculate incentive compensation, which was $65 million and $21 million, respectively.
(d)In 2008, Corning recorded a charge of $12 million to settle litigation associated with our Display segment.

(e)In 2011, the $384 million represents an adjustment for special dividends which were not received from the Company’s equity affiliates. In 2010, Corning received a special dividend of $868 million after-tax from our equity affiliate Samsung Corning Precision.

 

H-4J-4


LOGO

LOGO


LOGOLOGO

Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by internet or telephone!

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on April 26, 2012.

Vote by Internet

LOGO

•  Go towww.investorvote.com/glw

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•     Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone. There isNO CHARGEto you for the call.

•     Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.x

LOGO

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.   q

 

1

Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs Abstain

 A  Election of Directors — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the listed nominees.

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X

01AG2A

1

U PX

1.  Nominees:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain+

     01 - John Seely Brown¨¨¨02 - Stephanie A. Burns¨¨¨03 - John A. Canning, Jr.¨¨¨
     04 - Richard T. Clark¨¨¨05 - James B. Flaws¨¨¨06 - Gordon Gund¨¨¨
     07 - Kurt M. Landgraf¨¨¨08 - Deborah D. Rieman¨¨¨09 - H. Onno Ruding¨¨¨
     10 - Mark S. Wrighton¨¨¨

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

 B  Management’s Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

2.   Approval of the Company’s executive compensation.

¨¨¨

3.   Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Corning’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

¨¨¨

4.   Approval of Corning Incorporated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

¨¨¨

5.   Approval of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to remove the provisions currently requiring a supermajority vote of the Company’s shareholders.

¨¨¨

.

 C  Non-Voting Items

Change of Address — Please print your new address below.Discontinue Duplicates ReportsMeeting Attendance
Mark the box to the right if you wish
to discontinue receiving duplicate
Annual Reports.
¨Mark the box to the right if
you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting.
¨

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.
LOGO

01FEKC

+


Change of Address — Please print your new address below.

D Non-Voting Items

B Management’s Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 4 and for 1 YEAR on Proposal 3.

Meeting Attendance

Mark the box to the right

if you plan to attend the

Annual Meeting.

Discontinue Duplicates Reports

Mark the box to the right if you wish

to discontinue receiving duplicate

Annual Reports.

A Election of Directors — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the listed nominees.

01—John Seely Brown

04—Kurt M. Landgraf

02—John A. Canning, Jr. 03—Gordon Gund

1. Nominees: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold

05—H. Onno Ruding

Shareholder Proposal — The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 5.

5. Shareholder Proposal Concerning Special Meetings. For Against Abstain

C

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

06—Glenn F. Tilton

For Against Abstain

2. Approval, by non-binding vote, on executive compensation.

4. Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

as Corning’s independent registered public accounting

firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

3. Approval, by non-binding, on the frequency of future

executive compensation votes.

NNNNNNNNNNNN

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

NNNNNNN 1 1 2 6 7 3 1

MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE

140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND NNNNNNNNN

C 1234567890 J N T

000004

MR A SAMPLE

DESIGNATION (IF ANY)

ADD 1

ADD 2

ADD 3

ADD 4

ADD 5

ADD 6

ENDORSEMENT_LINE            SACKPACK            

qIF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A—E ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

_IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE._

Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by Internet or telephone!

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting

methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by

1:00 a.m., Central Time, on April 28, 2011.

Vote by Internet

• Log on to the Internet and go to

www.investorvote.com/glw

• Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.

Vote by telephone

• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA,

US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone

telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call.

• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

1234 5678 9012 345


LOGO

ENVELOPE.q

 

Proxy — Corning Incorporated

+

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FOR THE 20112012 MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

APRIL 28, 201126, 2012

The undersigned hereby appoints James B. Flaws and Wendell P. Weeks and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution, to vote as designated on the reverse side,

on behalf of the undersigned all shares of Stock which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Meeting of Shareholders of Corning Incorporated on April 28, 2011,

26, 2012, and any adjournments thereof, with all powers that the undersigned would possess if personally present. In their discretion, the proxies are hereby authorized to vote upon

such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

If you are a current or former employee of Corning Incorporated and own shares of Corning Common Stock through a Corning Incorporated benefit plan, your share ownership

as of February 24, 2011,23, 2012, is shown on this proxy card. Your vote will provide voting instructions to the trustees of the plans. If no instructions are given, the trustees will vote

your shares as described in the proxy statement.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS MADE. IF NO CHOICES ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL LISTED

NOMINEES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON THE OTHER MATTERS REFERRED TO ON THE

REVERSE SIDE HEREOF.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting April 28, 2011.26, 2012. The proxy statement and annual report to security

holders are available at www.corning.com/2011_proxy.2012_proxy.

.

Proxy — Corning Incorporated

E Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

 DAuthorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate

officer, please provide your FULL title.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
        /        /                 

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A—E ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. +

¢

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.+

_IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE._